Jump to content

Frostfirefox

Members
  • Posts

    468
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Everything posted by Frostfirefox

  1. [quote name='Schad' timestamp='1308382450' post='2733786'] I haven't made an argument...I'm just pointing out the remarkable series of coincidences that led Leprechaun to fight three nations -- one from GR, one from Synergy and one from RD -- all of who were active but somehow forgot to do any meaningful damage to him. Like I said: luck of the Irish, that. [/quote] From my understanding he was down to about 1300 infra or so. From 4000
  2. [quote name='Locke' timestamp='1307027402' post='2722568'] Because you're impotent and need other people to do your botched work. And hey, you brought it up. [/quote] I haven't fought you this round?
  3. [quote name='Locke' timestamp='1306963665' post='2722179'] I did as soon as I saw I was attacked. You have fun scrounging up more people to hit us? [/quote] Haha don't point fingers :3 I just want to see if you will get nuked
  4. Hey locke :3 you should attack your raider
  5. [quote name='Locke' timestamp='1306685205' post='2720031'] I haven't lost a war in TE since I came back a few rounds ago [/quote] Isn't this like... your first war SINCE then?
  6. [quote name='Schad' timestamp='1306376858' post='2718339'] Heh, how many Mario Related Nations are there? [/quote] 5% of total :3
  7. [quote name='bcortell' timestamp='1306213624' post='2717301'] Sentences.. If this was the first time, then what? I will remember to go to a 1st grade level next time. Actually, you're not even significant enough to respond to. I'm not putting the effort into explaining things to you any more. [/quote] Its not the first time :3 and you just responded to me genius
  8. [quote name='bcortell' timestamp='1306204808' post='2717236'] The next sentence. You called Paul bitter because Paul said Laz sucks and his point is proven because he (Laz) just hugs infra. I pointed out that Laz left G-6 before this war, giving a little more evidence that he hugs infra rather than fight in a war. I feel like I have to explain this on a 3rd grade level.. [/quote] If this was the first time. Your 3rd grade level might be useful.
  9. [quote name='bcortell' timestamp='1306203749' post='2717222'] Heh. Well, Laz isn't fighting in this war, is he? Boy, he's lucky he was able to leave G-6 before they got wrecked even more. [/quote] :3 what does where laz is have to do with pauls bitterness towards him :3
  10. [quote name='paul711' timestamp='1306193922' post='2717146'] It doesn't matter he still sucks and my point is proven. He is nothing but an infra hugger. [/quote] Awh is someone still bitter :3
  11. [quote name='jammar' timestamp='1306005023' post='2716180'] I'm wonder, unless I misread some numbers RE got more ns, higher ans, more nukes and around the same amount of nations as G-6 and TTK together. How'd you manage to keep the unfair war bawwers out of your topic? [/quote] All's fair in love and war :3 plus manly men don't bawl :3
  12. damn, someone forgot to mend the strings :3
  13. Tropical holiday for me :3 bring on the heat
  14. [quote name='Windblade' timestamp='1305676088' post='2713923'] So everyone has to wait until you've bought your nukes? Instead of posting this on the OWF why won't you go around and ask for help? [/quote] That would be against their rules
  15. [quote name='Owney OSullivan' timestamp='1305326114' post='2711521'] Anyone else feel like TE is starting to resemble SE a little too much? [/quote] Perhaps TE is TE and this is the way it's always been chaotic in its own right
  16. Woohoo, go IRON and GR and TPC
  17. [quote name='bcortell' timestamp='1304313900' post='2703891'] Look at what AA I am from, and then the AA of the person that talked about grab bag, then back at my AA, then back at his, then back at mine. Rinse and repeat until you get it. [/quote] Nope nothing (cough cough, it was your [url="http://forums.cybernations.net/index.php?showtopic=99207&view=findpost&p=2645946"]alliance[/url]) You do the same things we do
  18. [quote name='bcortell' timestamp='1304305420' post='2703682'] How is that paranoid? It's completely reasonable to think that the nations that left DR could rejoin it and counter us with their ties to them, [/quote] Is that so? Weren't you just ranting about reasons and nonsense? So G-6 can't make reasonable decisions (much as is most our wars) but it's acceptable for you? To throw out your reasons and do things your alliance has scorned G-6 for while still playing the moral high ground? Are we still so evil?
  19. [quote name='bcortell' timestamp='1304303700' post='2703654'] But, I guess that you just wanted to ignore that it was really impossible for us to know what DR was actually doing with the guys that left. [/quote] Paranoid much? We're all out to get you, hide your lucky charms.
  20. [quote name='bcortell' timestamp='1304296843' post='2703544'] All of the nations PS declared on were in DR earlier in the round. [/quote] G-6 could do exactly what your doing. To lets say, PS for humors sake. We declare war on PS and hit other nations and say they were in PS. You know the amount of !@#$ we would get over it? As I said h-y-p-o-c-r-i-s-y Being said it is lower than our war on LE, because we hit formed alliances where as you hit single nations. but in all goodness it's entirely different You are good, respectable people :3 G-6 is defiantly evil, low tricksters. All of which eat babies. And to top it off we have no honor in this game because we do exactly what everyone else does, but do not care to hide behind a wall of lies and denial. I trust the alliances that do these things and act like saints compared to us less than I trust a deranged man holding a chainsaw covered in blood. We are straight forward and do not hide our ill moves while berating others for theirs, all the while smiling just long enough to seize and opportunity to stab someone in the back. (it has happened before)
  21. [quote name='Vol Navy' timestamp='1304235164' post='2703046'] This is a golden thread....G-6 kept declaring on LE and it was fine. LE declares once on G-6 and they suddenly can't let anything go? [/quote] Similar to how everything G-6 does is evil :3 am i right? And suddenly our tactics are gold mines and its only evil for us to use it PS declared a "grab bag" such as you called our first war of last round. We appreciate your attention of trying to justify all our doings as evil, but a murderer playing high ground over a murderer makes no sense to me LE declared upwards in NS but with a large outweigh of nukes: Reminds me of the round where we were dishonorable for declaring upwards in NS and nations but had the prominent nuke count. I personally have no problem with these tactics but quit trying to justify things so hypocritically. For people who hate 'politics' you sure like to put your foot in it and go as far as possible. And if we were winning I'd still say its dull~ Predictable~ And so much hypocrisy~ One day a peaceful solution will be settled, just gotta realize we play just as foul as everyone else. Just without the denial.
  22. [quote name='bcortell' timestamp='1304228589' post='2703002'] Re-read my post.. already answered your points. You guys found new reasons to hit, and there are infinite reasons in TE. So it's hard to believe when you guys say it's done. When exactly does the fact that you've warred the same people over and over outweigh the need to hit them again? It's been put out there before, and you guys keep coming back to us. So be it. Well, this time we decided to strike first. We weren't going to let you get a [i]new[/i] reason to hit us. If you guys want it to be over, I'm sure 'our' side would be fine with that. [/quote] It's nice to have competition but many are angry with us because we employed all our resources in what they say was a dishonorable way (still no honor in video games) and when we celebrated many got mad at us after stating "We don't care about flag running." We happily lost the final war of the round after doing our best. Why bear a grudge (even a slight one) over a fruitful round where the alliances on 'your' side were blessed in many wars won and most who participated generally had fun? Reasons or not, we fought LE 2 weeks ago and are fighting them again. While we are in training mode still and it does serve as a backbone lesson to things (though fun generally takes place over elitism), it is a tad bit boring to have a repeat of 2 weeks ago if I may say so.
  23. [quote name='bcortell' timestamp='1304224143' post='2702945'] Heh. You guys kept coming up with reasons to hit our side, instead of saying to yourself, "Ya know, we've already fought them once (and then twice), maybe we should fight someone else." So, you coming up with reasons like that doesn't support your argument. It's TE. Anyone could come up with a reason- or not have one at all- and attack someone. The fact remains that you guys kept coming after the same AA's, not us. Your reasons don't show any progress towards not fighting, only finding new reasons to fight the same people. But, hopefully what Marcus said is true, and this will be the end of it. [/quote] Your tactless to say we keep coming after the same AA's. LE is just an overlap out of the multiple other alliances we declared on. I myself was hoping for a nice war in between the flag run and the inevitable grudge match (which more may follow, but none from us)
  24. [quote name='bcortell' timestamp='1304220226' post='2702900'] You see.. there's always a new reason. [/quote] Quit trying to breed a truth in your mind and the paranoia will leave you.
  25. In G-6, puppet state declares on you.
×
×
  • Create New...