[quote name='TypoNinja' timestamp='1297085688' post='2623954']This kind of thinking is just plain silly. Let your foreign policy be dictated by who can chain a treaty to drag you into a war first? More people need the stones to stand up and decide which side they agree with and make a stand with them, regardless of who manages to chain where. Saying you just follow treaties is another of saying you have no spine. Leaders are leaders to make decisions, not to let others make them for them.[/quote]
The LSF enters war when it is in its interests with relation to its principles as a Libertarian Socialist grouping and its history and bond with its alliance partners. In reply to an earlier post, if NATO were attacked and requested help, so long as our treaty with NATO would not conflict with another I don't see why the federation would not answer its ally's call. If there was a treaty conflict, the decision of war would be up to the delegates' council comprised of all members to be collectively decide on.
We have no interests in the petty squabbles of bourgeois alliances, we fight for ourselves and our friends as our history shows. The large alliances can fight until they destroy one another and their respective rank and file in destructive global and 'controlled' wars, we recognise this as an inevitability on Planet Bob and exist not for the hegemonic blocs or any other such power other than the collective will of our entire membership to dictate our fate, we would resist such an attempt to hinder our liberty as history shows.
We are all our own leaders, democratise your alliances!