Jump to content

Workers Federation

Members
  • Posts

    115
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Everything posted by Workers Federation

  1. Our INT allies will be back up and running in no time again, with help from us where we can spare it too. To long lasting friendship and the black guards' win
  2. [quote name='Ginji' timestamp='1297216572' post='2626379'] you have no knowledge about communists, you uneducated fool [/quote] No no, I'd say anyone who seeks a material solution to capital based on the interests of the labouring class in the form of communism should detest religion as not only a potential useful tool of coercion by illegitimate authority, most notably the ruling class through their state, but also exists as a baseless relic from our more primitive times and serves as a pedestool for moralists. This doesn't mean union cannot be made between these two different forces (even though JAMA profess to be Islamic socialist and I suspect this tie is more to do with that aspect of JAMA's politics) nor does it mean socialists should smash religious groups purely for that reason. Hope both groups benefit from this friendship.
  3. [quote name='cheezy' timestamp='1295411556' post='2582753'] LSF on top again. I should really bump NEATs thread after our allies [/quote] Lol I would have done that if I didn't see this comment first
  4. [quote name='TypoNinja' timestamp='1297085688' post='2623954']This kind of thinking is just plain silly. Let your foreign policy be dictated by who can chain a treaty to drag you into a war first? More people need the stones to stand up and decide which side they agree with and make a stand with them, regardless of who manages to chain where. Saying you just follow treaties is another of saying you have no spine. Leaders are leaders to make decisions, not to let others make them for them.[/quote] The LSF enters war when it is in its interests with relation to its principles as a Libertarian Socialist grouping and its history and bond with its alliance partners. In reply to an earlier post, if NATO were attacked and requested help, so long as our treaty with NATO would not conflict with another I don't see why the federation would not answer its ally's call. If there was a treaty conflict, the decision of war would be up to the delegates' council comprised of all members to be collectively decide on. We have no interests in the petty squabbles of bourgeois alliances, we fight for ourselves and our friends as our history shows. The large alliances can fight until they destroy one another and their respective rank and file in destructive global and 'controlled' wars, we recognise this as an inevitability on Planet Bob and exist not for the hegemonic blocs or any other such power other than the collective will of our entire membership to dictate our fate, we would resist such an attempt to hinder our liberty as history shows. We are all our own leaders, democratise your alliances!
  5. Glory glory hail hail etc... Good to be tied to you guys!
  6. Congrats on the victory, especially to our friends in The International!
  7. LONG LIVE THE PANDA LORDS!!! [img]http://guanabee.com/panda_attack_11.24.jpg[/img] Also, join LSF. ONE OF US ONE OF US!
  8. See the world, and get laid? I'm tempted.
  9. All hail NEAT, and it is pretty neat, no kidding. Nice graphics!
  10. [img]http://www.beijingolympicsfan.com/wp-content/uploads/2008/05/sleepy-panda.jpg[/img] ONE OF US! ONE OF US! ONE OF US! ONE OF US! ONE OF US! ONE OF US! ONE OF US! ONE OF US! ONE OF US! ONE OF US! ONE OF US! ONE OF US! ONE OF US! ONE OF US! ONE OF US! ONE OF US! ONE OF US! ONE OF US! ONE OF US! ONE OF US! ONE OF US! ONE OF US! ONE OF US! ONE OF US! ONE OF US! ONE OF US! ONE OF US! ONE OF US!
×
×
  • Create New...