Jump to content

Hero89

Members
  • Posts

    40
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Everything posted by Hero89

  1. Yes!! I've done my part. I did not say that MK has become a monster and I definitly did not say they have become the old NPO! o/ MK! Im not insulting MK, I Do disagree with your actions though. lol .. ok, saying you were a bully was kinda an insult. My bad
  2. Great DoW, not all that short and simple though.
  3. Alot of people are posting very intelligent, well thought out, and interesting posts on this thread. However the fact remains that this entire war was unprovoked, unjust, and completely ridiculous. MK didnt start a war to "Save CN", they started a war because they were bored and feeling left out (I've not been included in many "back channel" chats either). Whatever NPO did 2 years ago should not be cause for a CB now (I was here for the bullying so I can say that). MK/Doomhouse is the new bully on the playground, congratulations on becoming what you've fought so hard to rid Bob of.
  4. o/R&R o/Ego!! congrats (power is deserved!!) o/Stealthy?!
  5. [quote] Here's my personal opinion: It takes two to tango. This could have been handled a bit more responsibly by both parties. Yes, RoK approached NSO with a legitimate issue, and NSO failed to consider it to be a legitimate issue. I can agree that as far as the skirmish itself goes, NSO is at fault by aiding the rogue knowing full well that RoK considered it to be an act of war. However, I also believe that considering that to be an act of war in the first place is also a bit childish. And so is this DoW. And while we can sit here and argue that NSO started this war by aiding the rogue, let us not forget that this didn't become a war until this DoW was posted. And it wasn't NSO that posted it. Let us also not forget that when we go to war, it's because alliance leaders have called upon their members to sacrifice months (even years) of work in building their nations. I would hope that such sacrifices would be made only for good reasons. I see no reason why this couldn't have been settled without a DoW. Sometimes it's best to just.... let it go. I know I know, for that to happen it would take a bit of maturity and just a pinch more of valuing your nations a bit more than that. So some rogue is in a war with one of your nations. It's much cheaper to just let it slide and build the nation back up again, than it is to call in the cavalry. What we have here is a war of principle. So what's to stop this from happening again and again? Well, if it were to happen again, then yes, I'd say a DoW is warranted. But at least give it a chance. That way, you can actually tell your members that there wasn't one more thing that you could have done to prevent this. Regardless of who wins, everyone will be losing infra. Over what? Over this? When I was in the NPO-GPA war, I fought against GPA. But trust me, it's nothing to brag about. Know why? Because it was a stupid war. Officially, however, BCOM will stand with its allies should this escalate any further, admin help us all. [/quote] Very well said sir, not having ties on either side gives me an objective view and to me it seems that Immaturity/Boredom was the entire reason for this war. Completely unnecessary if either side had taken a little time to sort things out. Attacking an alliance so much smaller than yours for such a ridiculous reason, well I guess boys will be boys.
  6. http://s1.zetaboards.com/CNLOUD/index/ Stop by and say hello, just make sure your LOUD or we wont hear ya.. BTW to anyone who joins, Tommorow is always free beer day..
×
×
  • Create New...