SpoiL

[quote name='Jocabia' date='20 February 2010 - 05:13 AM' timestamp='1266660825' post='2193466'] [IMG]http://i87.photobucket.com/albums/k144/jocabia/NSO_Motivation.jpg[/IMG] http://www.cybernations.net/nation_drill_display.asp?Nation_ID=128772 There's a link to my nation if you hippies want to stop cowering in peace mode and actually live up to that declaration of war you were all so proud of. [/quote] http://www.cybernations.net/search_wars.asp?search=128772&Extended=1 It's too bad I can't use the nukes I've rebuilt on you. See, I actually fought in this war.

[quote name='Johnny Apocalypse' date='18 February 2010 - 10:10 PM' timestamp='1266549005' post='2191112'] Without evidence that C&G were guaranteed to attack TOP and friends, it's not a justified pre-emptive strike. Therefore, wrong. Come into my box. [/quote] Great Lord Ruler Chief Emperor Spoilbob graduated high school with an 'A' average. Who are you trying to dupe? I'm not going to dig the quote out, but it's already been stated that the appropriate parties weren't going to ignore their treaty obligations when the other party forced that treaty to be activated. There's your 'proof', as irrelevant as it is to the obvious course the war would've taken.

[quote name='Johnny Apocalypse' date='18 February 2010 - 08:44 PM' timestamp='1266543890' post='2190861'] So will you admit you were wrong in 'pre-emptively' attacking C&G? I'm not going to begin with reparations because that's not my place to say how much or anything like that. [/quote] Wrong? lol Step out of your box.

[quote name='itseZe' date='18 February 2010 - 07:52 PM' timestamp='1266540752' post='2190712'] This is the TOP-CnG war. You seem to be getting your wars confused. [/quote] I am not.

[quote name='Sunstar' date='18 February 2010 - 02:28 AM' timestamp='1266478093' post='2189190'] Its nice to see in one place a list of alliances which support unwarranted aggression and wish to get away without paying for the massive damages they caused to over a hundred different alliances. [/quote] Perhaps you should pay for the damage done in the war you kept going, despite having ended with NpO-\m/. Yes, that sounds right.

[quote name='joracy' date='17 February 2010 - 09:14 PM' timestamp='1266459270' post='2188600'] I see. If you get attacked, and defend yourself, you are the aggressor. Cool. This is such a worthless game of a semantics. It's stupid even for the OWF. [/quote] TOP [i]aggressively[/i] preempted C&G from attacking them. That was the reason for this particular front of this war that should have ended with NpO-\m/. Who's fault is it that the war continues? Well, who is the one calling it a separate war; who is the one playing semantics with the word 'aggressive', ignoring the defensive implications. I know you stand to gain from it, which is why we hear all the spin. And when confronted with the reality, it is why you resort back to "but they attacked us!".

[quote name='jamesdanaher' date='16 February 2010 - 07:34 AM' timestamp='1266323681' post='2185454'] I'm sure Polaris government members were not confused as to the state of peace talks. If you were entering on behalf of a coalition- surely you would have a high level of communication with those in-the-know? [/quote] You'd think so, wouldn't you? [img]http://i196.photobucket.com/albums/aa134/SpoiL724/nso.gif[/img]

[quote name='jamesdanaher' date='16 February 2010 - 07:17 AM' timestamp='1266322644' post='2185441'] Is it wrong for C&G to wish to defend itself? We were not involved in the NpO-\m/ war at that stage. As we have said - we view this as aggression. [/quote] Because it is convenient.

[quote name='Penlugue Solaris' date='15 February 2010 - 10:24 PM' timestamp='1266290693' post='2184193'] Quick Stumpy, to the bat cave! Damn you Chron. No, I honestly have no idea what you are saying if that wasn't it. [/quote] I welcome you to ask next time. I was speaking of this hegemonic(word?) philosophy of having to hold down your opponent for extended periods of time, be it by extended war(or continued war, despite it having ended with NpO-\m/, in this case), absurd surrender terms, viceroy, etc. Those folk just might be inclined to return the favor when things are so stacked in your favor, hence 'I've seen your future. It reads...Karma.' No, I don't mean me or NSO.

[quote name='Penlugue Solaris' date='15 February 2010 - 10:20 PM' timestamp='1266290447' post='2184179'] I understand. We deserve to be rolled for being attacked by TOP and IRON. What were we thinking, letting them attack us? [/quote] No, thats not it. I know you know that though, despite not being willing to admit it. (Yes, I read your mind)

[quote name='Penlugue Solaris' date='15 February 2010 - 10:15 PM' timestamp='1266290120' post='2184154'] If TOP and NSO have some form of future predicting device, then I for one would be greatly interested in buying it off of you. I knew it!! [/quote] I've seen your future. It reads...Karma.

You tout the word paranoia as if it wasn't legitimate, actual, real future circumstances of CnG joining the war. You can spin the technical aspect of it being an aggressive action, but the [i]aggressive[/i] action was a defensively preemptive move. The real paranoia here is continuing the war that should have and [i]did[/i] 'end' because the opposing alliance doesn't like you and might 'be a threat' to you.

[img]http://i228.photobucket.com/albums/ee181/PrimoDeRivera/postercopy.png[/img]

x

[quote name='Dontasemebro' date='09 February 2010 - 12:09 AM' timestamp='1265692175' post='2169892'] Except the NpO \m/ war ended, the CB was apologized for, and the TOP war was started because TOP feels CnG is a threat and will take any and every chance to attack them. That is why we are fighting. [/quote] Yes, hence the 'preemptive strike'. CnG would have been entering the war when they activated a treaty and they admit that.

[quote name='thedestro' date='06 February 2010 - 05:00 PM' timestamp='1265493614' post='2165190'] [img]http://www.pinab.com/destro/ride2.gif[/img] Possibly my last piece for this war..frame-by-frame animation not done in Flash....never again.. [/quote] Thats funny. Fark should be in the background though.

[quote name='Sal Paradise' date='06 February 2010 - 05:54 PM' timestamp='1265496846' post='2165261'] Yeah, I couldn't believe Polar wasn't going to honour their treaty with MK either. But did you notice they did? See, they didn't go against their word. All's well. [/quote] They went against their word by not going against their word. The paradox prevails

[quote name='Kijuna69' date='06 February 2010 - 05:48 PM' timestamp='1265496480' post='2165248'] So if someone gives their word not to keep their word and breaks their word and indeed keeps their word... does that make them honest or dishonest? [/quote] It makes them confused, used, and defeated.

[quote name='Masterof9puppets' date='06 February 2010 - 02:29 PM' timestamp='1265484573' post='2164916'] [img]http://i639.photobucket.com/albums/uu118/zombiesfromspace/Sigs/lolnpo.jpg[/img] [size="6"]Kronos:[/size] [size="5"]Top rated on SDI's since 2009[/size] [size="5"]NpO:[/size] [size="4"]Lol.[/size] [/quote] I had 10 in a row. 18 though?!

[quote name='kpcurley' date='06 February 2010 - 12:39 PM' timestamp='1265477973' post='2164749'] You sir would make a terrible lawyer. No where does Grub say that he will no attack TOP, all he said is he approves of you war plans. there could be any number of reasons he approved of your plans, it could of been to roll you for all we know. This is a poor post designed to defame an alliances on half truths and log dumps. Fight you war, and quit with the "no u". [/quote] Don't do this to yourself. More importantly, don't degrade NpO to such a petty argument.

[quote name='Lord Rune' date='06 February 2010 - 08:06 AM' timestamp='1265461607' post='2164311'] I thought things were bad when I had 4 nukes blocked. [/quote] I should write a song about "My SDI" now Where you at Sir Paul?

This war could have been fun if it kept to its actual purpose. I die now for all of this foolery? E-Heart breaking, all of it.

[quote name='treygreen13' date='04 February 2010 - 02:01 PM' timestamp='1265310072' post='2159136'] [img]http://i291.photobucket.com/albums/ll293/treygreen13/11attempts.jpg[/img] [/quote] I don't brag, but, I [i]am[/i] fighting 3 people with double my tech [b]alone[/b] in succession to 2 wars with FOK. NpO, IRON..happy to do it.

[quote name='Ruiseart' date='03 February 2010 - 07:06 PM' timestamp='1265241990' post='2157435'] [IMG]http://i48.tinypic.com/ejaeis.jpg[/IMG] FOK FARK [/quote] [img]http://i196.photobucket.com/albums/aa134/SpoiL724/11attempts.gif[/img]

[quote name='Cyber Nationz' date='03 February 2010 - 03:32 PM' timestamp='1265229138' post='2157014'] Since when did the caring polaris Help the bad Guys...Sith [IMG]http://i48.tinypic.com/wqphyv.png[/IMG] [/quote] The bear had a lot of potential, though, not well executed. 4