Corinan

Shamelessly begging us for cash so you can continue your guerilla campaign against us? I don't see it happening for you. All good things must come to an end, even good training exercises. You've served your purpose, and now this is the part where you wither away into oblivion.

The only rights you have on Planet Bob are the ones you're able to successfully defend or the ones your superiors let you have. Its a harsh world, Madmonkey24.

A "fundamental right?" Who says?

Chickenzilla, if GATO could govern itself better than Pacifica can, it wouldn't be in the position it's currently in. It's really as simple as that.

I don't know what the hell you're talking about. I suspect you don't either. He said "no thank you" to the idea of an eternal Pacifican viceroy in GATO. I respectfully informed him that the New Pacific Order does not need his alliances permission to do anything. If you're suggesting that he actually thinks that GATO could run itself better than Pacifica could, well, history proves that theory wrong. GATO wasn't nicknamed "Worst Alliance Ever" for nothing, you know.

Like we require your permission....

I voted never as that is my sincere hope. Time and time again GATO has shown that it is incapable of governing itself. They require Pacificas guiding hand.

If anyone would be getting bumped up the Tech Corps queue, it wouldn't be me. I'm pretty sure you realize that. Katsumis experience with the NPO Tech Corps was likely a while ago, when it actually moved a bit slower than it does now.

No, I wouldn't expect you to. Submitting to the truth would kinda shatter this lame attempt at propaganda, wouldn't it?

Actually I submitted an order for tech last week and received it within days. I was quite impressed with the speed of the transaction, especially considering how many other orders were being placed. Pacificas Tech Corps is excellent, which is more than I can say for this shoddy article, which somehow manages to be even worse than last weeks.

I've actually always thought I represented what Pacifica used to be like. If anything we've grown a bit more compassionate under Emperor Revenge. This can be seen as a good or bad thing depending on your view. I think most consider this a good thing, especially if you were around for the alternatives. Seriously, were you around for Emperor Ivan? Count your blessings that you're dealing with benevolent Emperor Revenge.

I aim to please.

And by better future, you mean a future in which you and your allies are in power and Pacifica and Her allies are not. Nothing more. Drop all the revolutionary bull and just state what it is you really want. Power.

Oh hey great another one of these. We were totally due.

Yes, it does, actually. And guess who that will be, Mogar? Then we will say we were right, and no one will be around to say differently.

Someone hasn't read their Ivan Moldavi. I always think for myself. I made the decision to be a Pacifican years ago and have been happy with that decision (for the large part) since.

It's delicious. You should have had some.

You know.....I'm liking you more and more everyday.

No, I don't respect the sovereignty of our enemies, as our enemies always have it coming to them. I think it's a far cry from that to raiding a nation just minding its own business, however. Nice try, though.

I was wondering about that, Bilrow. Thank you for shining a light on the mans lying. I wonder how he'll respond?

You speak of respecting sovereignty while simultaneously violating a random unaligned nations sovereignty by tech raiding it. I hate hypocrisy. When your alliance finally gets its comeuppance I can only hope that Pacifica is somehow involved in it.

Sure I can. How is my post hypocritical? I wrote up a real quick guide to roguery and you turn it into a criticism of Pacificas foreign affairs policy. I guess I don't really understand what your point was in that, but I'm assuming you just wanted to take a shot at the Order.

Nintendertek, I want you to re-read that quote and then tell me exactly how you failed. You pretty explicitly implied that I said that there.

Please tell me where I stated that Vladimir has never lost an argument. Go ahead. Read what I said a little slower this time. Also, just because many people come out against one of his arguments does not necessarily make the argument false. I'm pretty sure they have a fancy Latin term for that. Responding to his argument with "lol Vladimir" does not invalidate the argument, either. Anytime that I can remember where someone actually tries to engage Vladimir intellectually, they're defeated. And just for future reference, West of Eden, you cannot discredit someone simply because you failed to comprehend what they were saying.

I don't think you know what "ironic" means.