Jump to content

avernite

Members
  • Posts

    825
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Blog Comments posted by avernite

  1. I, too, am surprised by the high levels of morale in this war; it's actually a rather big change compared to earlier wars, where at this point in time entire alliances or even, in GW2, entire sides were surrendering.

    Is it just boredom, or are our alliances that much better organised that all these members actually feel pride or obligation?

  2. Well, apart from the losing side bit I think you're quite correct; the middle and lower tiers are lost to our side, possibly, but the upper tier is still a contest, and IF it is won by our side, your analysis will miss a very crucial element... In some sense, that would render many of your points moot, even though the sheer loss of power below that tier is still going to be a crucial element of the post-war world.

  3. amad: actually, I fully agree with you, except for one thing:

    some alliances know how much money they have, and it reinforces your point; Matt Miller showed after karma just how meaningless the loss of infrastructure is with upper-tier warchests, and at this point in time warchests are on average only bigger.

    However, the loss of cash due to nuclear anarchy collections is hardly so critical; at a rough cost in upper tiers of 10 million per day for such collection, that's not all that huge (essentially you lose an extra day of bills), and will indeed take weeks if not months to start counting for something.

    Even so, it's still the best strategy there is for putting your enemies out of action, and those nations without adequate warchests will suffer VERY harshly.

×
×
  • Create New...