Jump to content

rileyaddaff

Members
 View Profile  See their activity

  • Posts

    375

  • Joined

  • Last visited

 Content Type 

Everything posted by rileyaddaff

  1. rileyaddaff
  2. rileyaddaff
    You put onthem shoes boy, and ya run. ya run and don't look back neither boy
  3. rileyaddaff
    close, it was candyman.
  4. rileyaddaff
    What's your definition of interesting? DBDC has tons a threads dedicated to them from IC to the suggestion box. Pretty soon they'll just use the OWF as their forums.
  5. rileyaddaff
    With 600+ nations they can be very efficient and effective as meat shields.
  6. rileyaddaff
    I heard if you go into the bathroom, look into the mirror, and chant doombird doomcave 5 times you will have 50 messages in your inbox after update.
  7. rileyaddaff
    The name alone has all the ingredients for success
  8. rileyaddaff
    Feeling the need to announce a treaty to express your love for one bloc mate over the other is still another treaty.
  9. rileyaddaff
    Alliances merging and treaties being signed, the season must be approaching.
  10. rileyaddaff
    This merge killed 20+ treaties and I thank you for that. I have a feeling over the next few months you'll sign 7-10 treaties all over the place and for that I hate you.
  11. rileyaddaff
    Great. Now we have a bunch of shoeless one-leggers hopping through the crap people are spewing in this thread
  12. rileyaddaff
    Inb4 OP gets canned for being a multi and warn threads pop up
  13. rileyaddaff
    Well seeing how a 2000 days old tech farming nation just created an account today to start this, I do believe this to be a game tywin.
  14. rileyaddaff
    This guy doesn't care, but I care enough to set you back one ;) (-1)
  15. rileyaddaff
    Remind me of this post if you every make it into gov. somewhere
  16. rileyaddaff
    We don't have enough New (something) Order alliances, bring back NWO
  17. rileyaddaff
    When I look at post karma I see this - http://cybernations.wikia.com/wiki/Timeline_of_Major_Wars (sorry no special hyperlink) I see a stable times and the lack of multiple wars. This realm thrives on disorder and the moralists are a plague to our society ;)
  18. rileyaddaff
    inserting a random graph doesn't make your case. Now if you had a graph that showed CN the fall of players over the years, I might actually take a look at it and the statement attached to it.
  19. rileyaddaff
    Such actions are achievable though deletion, but I don't condone such actions. I may hate everyone, but if one were to delete, then eventually I would have no one to hate. If sovereignty can not be taken away then why does it even come up in an arguments?
  20. rileyaddaff
    Sovereignty is such a beautiful word, but here it is nothing more than a word. Your sovereignty only lasts as long as someone else allows it. You of all people know that if you want true sovereignty, its only one click away, peace mode.
  21. rileyaddaff
    I was not saying that any of party was solely responsible for Woodstock. Looking back was it not a raid masked by deceit and formalized by our imaginary standards for war? DBDC walks that thin line between raids and war. In the opinion of the community outside of their direct influence calls this a war and has verbally condemned their actions. The same way people condemned NPO & MK's actions while being on top of the game in the "political" sense. DBDC is different because they are on top of the game in sense of "raw power". With that being said, it was a raid, but had a contingency plan in place in case of escalation. Pax decided to fight back, but it doesn't change the fact that they are just defending themselves from raiders. This is a prime example of a raid "gone south", but sadly (for those that want to see DBDC crucified for said actions), they had a back up plan.
  22. rileyaddaff
    o/
  23. rileyaddaff
    I don't remember the reasons why, but I do remember having fun in the Massacre. Neutrals don't do anything of significance to warrant a CB and thus one would have to be manufactured. Manufacturing a CB to claim the moral high ground of it not being a raid doesn't work with the defending entity being a neutral alliance. Let's face it, people like raiding neutrals for whatever reason they paint it as. Comparing neutrals to unaligned nations is such an obtuse statement, even for you hal. It's like saying "hey neutrals, your $%*!, and no better than a 1k NS nation." Neutrals have something we don't have, years of unchecked growth. Just imagine what they could accomplish if they installed programs like their warring counterparts. These "certain" parties of which you speak don't just go after neutrals. You weren't preaching about neutrals coming together when they raided Polar or when they raided you and your alliance. You're no Rembrandt so quit trying to paint pictures. So your telling them to compromise on giving up what they value most? Even if they bend it just a little, they break everything in which they stand for.
  24. rileyaddaff
    It stems from ancient times in terms of most nations today, but you still hear the old timers mention it every so often. A time when people would put an ounce of thought into their posts. When heated debates took place on the OWF without 20 warn/ban threads spawning and everyone(regardless of position in the alliance) was held accountable for what they said. The hatred stems from this and the inability of others to take action for the fear of losing their pixels which can be easily replaced with an ounce of effort. Tl;dr
  25. rileyaddaff
    I heard it from "the man" himself, it will be someone in the top 250.
×
×
  • Create New...