Jump to content

SleepiB

Members
  • Posts

    226
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Everything posted by SleepiB

  1. 1. Offensive Nuclear Policy? I don't think there's moral high ground to be had by condemning nukes. The chances of us initiating nukes in an offensive war are low, but we will initiate the use of nukes if necessary. 2. Defensive Nuclear Policy? Yes, we will retaliate in kind to nuclear weapons. 3. Does your alliance endorse tech raiding? No. 4. (Answer to #3) Why? Because it's not profitable to any of our members, and we prefer to destroy antagonists, not bystanders. 5. Why did your alliance choose your color? N/A, People can go wherever they find the best trades. 6. Are NAPs useless? Pretty much. 7. Do you believe in MADPs? (Meaning, why not just have MDoAPS just in case if you do not believe in the cause) They exist, but we don't see ourselves signing any. 8. Do you believe in the use of sanctioning during war? I believe people use sanctions during war, I'm not convinced it's a good idea. 9. Can you provide me a link to your flag? Yes. 11. What small alliances do you feel will be major political players in the long run? I don't know. 12. Do you consider TDO neutral? Yes, same for anyone else we are neither allied to or at war with. 14. Current recruitment? (Open-door? Applicant interviews? Invite-only?) Anyone may apply but we are rather selective. We don't actively recruit. 15. Does your alliance believe in preemptive strikes? We're not going to declare war on someone just because we think they might attack us. 16. Current view concerning NPO? Neutral 17. Who are the alliances you are closest to who you do not have a treaty with? Hard to say, 18. Do you believe/support in NPO's Revenge Doctrine? We have no interest in supporting or violating the Revenge Doctrine. 19. Rate 1-5 (1 being lowest) for which how well your alliance has each of the following: Military, diplomacy, economical, internal organization, stability. 5,3,4,3,4 21. What are your alliance's strengths? experience and solidarity 22. What are your alliance's weaknesses? boredom between wars 23. What alliances do typically the majority of your alliance descend from? Most of our membership has at some point been in MCXA, though there are those who hail from elsewhere. 25. Alliance A declare war on Alliance B. You have MADPs with both. Morally, you agree with Alliance A and feel they have a good enough reason for attacking alliance B, how do you go about handling this situation? Not applicable, we don't have any MADPs, and even if we did it would take staggering amounts of incompetence by both allies to get to a DoW with both treaties intact. If we did have two MDP+ partners out for each other's blood, we we would try to negotiate a fair peace, and may cancel a treaty with whatever party refuses to deal reasonably. 26. Do you believe in Perma-ZI? Nothing is permanent but some things are indefinite. People that actually want peace can get it. 27. An alliance called The Fookheads has a MADP with The Asgards. The Asgards decide to declare war on an alliance called Icantbelieveitsnotbutter alliance. Asgards reasoning for attacking is simply because they want dominant control over the silver senate, and they feel this is the only way possible. The Fookheads, whom have an MADP with The Asgards, feel the reasoning is both unethical and illogical, thus canceling their MADP. Are The Fookheads dishonorable for standing up for what they believe in and canceling the MADP? No, canceling the treaty is not dishonorable, refusing to honor the agreement before canceling it, however..... 30. Thoughts concerning... 30.1 ...Citadel? Cool people. 30.2 ...Frostbite? Cold people. 30.3 ...Superfriends? I like pie. 30.4 ...Complaints and Greviances? Where's the beef? 30.5 ...Common Defense Treaty? Purple skin is good for masking bruises. 33. Do you ever censor your members? Well, there is some information we'd prefer be kept within the alliance, such as war plans, and baiting trolls is frowned upon, but a member can express ideas to the rest of the alliance. 34. Are coups ever justifiable? People try to justify coups all the time, whether they succeed is a matter of perspective. 36. I respectively tell you I dislike your alliance, I feel your leaders are disrespectful who feed on power and power only. I also state I feel the general membership has no respect and constantly flame. What would your response/actions be? I'd tell you we await your DoW, but won't hold our breath. 38. State the results of any wars you have been in. Victorious in Karma war. 44. Your members wish for a new government, they don't like it and feel a different kind would be better. What do you do? I'd give whichever member that thinks something can be done better a chance to prove it. 45. What traits make a good alliance? Activity solidarity and competence 46. Current Government type? trium with delegation of certain responsibilities to other government members. 47. What are your alliance's ideals? Bacon is awesome, just ask Rah. 48. Did you support GGA's doctrine concerning the Green team, stating an alliance needs permission from the to form on GGA and no alliances other than GPA can vote for senate? If a senator from any other team has more than 20+ votes, they will be attacked. I wasn't aware of it, but it sounds amusing. 49. Do you believe in moral police? no 50. What treaties do you have? MDoAP with TOP ODPs with TFD and BTO 55. Do you feel you will ever be sanctioned? Probably not, we don't spend much effort recruiting new members. 56. How many members must be in an alliance before you consider them an actual alliance? 1? 5? 10? 20? 30+? Doesn't really matter, an individual can have influence and AAs of 30+ people can be completely insignificant. 60. Age range most of your members are? 20 ± 5 61. Where do most of your members live? We have members all across the world, including Australia, Germany, Great Britain, and the United States. 62. What crisis's have your alliance overcome? Our DoE, and various threats of war. 63. (#62) Did you become weaker or stronger because of them? The threat of war makes us stronger. 64. What were some of the most important steps your alliance have made in its history? The decision to exist. 66. What are your alliance's plans internally for the future? Twiddle our thumbs until someone starts some drama 67. What are your alliance's plans externally for the future? Buy tech until someone starts some drama. 68. GPA wants a MDP, do you accept? No, GPA is a neutral alliance. 69. The Hydra Clan enter a war you do not agree with, you have a MADP with them. You are seriously against it and it is against your morals, though, if you do not comply, you can be seen as traitors. What do you do? We cancel the MADP, and enter the war if asked. 70. What is honor? How is an alliance honorable, what makes an alliance honorable, and what makes an alliance dishonorable in your opinion? Honor is being straightforward with your allies. Dishonor is lying to yourself. 71. A GOONS member flames you, and you respond back, publicly, with harsh words as well. Who is wrong? Factual correctness is irrelevant in a flamewar, and it's usually pointless to get involved. 73. What is more beneficial in the long run, diplomacy or war experience? War experience is typically more useful. 75. Which alliances would you sign an MDP with if you had free choice? I'm in no hurry to sign a bunch of treaties. 76. What makes a effective fighting alliance? Activity, preparation(wonders, warchest, tech, nukes), Command Efficiency, and strategy(war guides, waves, and staggers). 77. In a war against a much bigger opponent against who you could not win, would you use the alliance nukes to go down fighting (to take as many of them down with us as possible - FAN style) or disband the alliance? We would go down fighting, the damage we deal far exceeding the damage we take. 78. Might makes right. True or false? True, you have every right that you have the will to assert and the power to enforce, everything else is privilege. 79. About the Unjust War: which side do you think was in the right, if either, and are you happy with the result? Don't really care. 80. Do you think that CN politics and diplomacy bear much of a similarity to diplomacy in real life? How are they similar or different, and why do you think this is? Does the diplomacy of CN more closely resemble that of any particular time period in human history, and would you change anything about the way it is generally conducted? The tree of liberty must be refreshed from time to time with the blood of patriots and tyrants. 81. Does the majority of your alliance sell tech or buy tech? For what price? We typically buy tech for 3m/100, but reliable sellers may get bonuses. 82. Does the majority of your alliance buy donations or sell tech? For what price? I don't think so, if any do their slots should already be full. 83. What was the cause of the Unjust War? (note: not the actual casus belli but the wider interrelation) Boredom, it's easy to come by a CB when you have a jerk protectorate to provoke an attack for you. 84. Do you have any ideas about where the next major tension or war might be? I'm guessing it will involve at least 2 of citadel, frostbite, and C&G 85. What do you think the effect of an alliance sanction is? Is it a good thing or a bad thing for most alliances? It's good for recruiting inactive noobs and ghosts, not much else. 90. Would your alliance ever spy on an alliance if you felt threatened? (Not in-game spying) No, unnecessary and counterproductive. Why the hell would I just hand a CB to someone I thought wanted to attack me? 91. The Fookheads have a NAP with TheMenHuggers. You have a MADP with The Fookheads, who break their NAP and attack TheMenHuggers. What do you do? Depends on circumstances, anything from declaring war on themenhuggers to canceling the MADP with the Fookheads. If it was a conflict of interest I'd expect the fookheads to have the decency to cancel the treaty first. 93. You send a member 15 Million Aid. 2 weeks later, the member leaves. Do you make the member pay 15 Million back? Or more? I've never seen an aid scammer get through our apps process, the motivation for leaving would probably matter most(so probably not). 94. Is there such thing as respectful freedom of speech over the CN forums? I have no idea what you mean by that, so no. 95. Should an entire alliance pay the price for one member's actions? (Non-government) If the alliance supports the member in his or her actions, yes, if the member is expelled, no. 96. Should an entire alliance pay the price for one member's actions? (Government) "" 97. Quality or Quantity? Quality, unless you're talking about nukes(then it's BOTH). 98. The Fookheads, who you have a MADP with, are forced to cancel all treaties to avoid war with the ILovePooNuggets Alliance. The ILovePooNuggets alliance finds a questionable cassus belli, do you help your ally even though they were forced to cancel the treaty? This makes no sense, we'd support rolling whatever party was pressuring them to drop the treaty BEFORE they canceled it. 99. Will alliances like NADC/WTF ever do anything? Are they isolationists? If they do something they do it, if you're concerned about something more specific, say so. 100. Your member sends aid to Mangina, who is on NPO's ZI list. (Not really, theoretical situation), who they never announced. There was no way for your alliance to know Mangina was on the list. NPO then attacks your member's nation. How do you handle this situation? What if it leads to a potential war, what will you do? The consequences for aiding a rogue depend on circumstances, if the member that aided the ZId nation knew about the ZI listing and aided anyway he would be asked to pay a suitable reparation to whatever nation is fighting mangina. This said, attacking a member of TSO without talking to us is grounds for war. We would ask for reparations equivalent to damage(rounded to a full aid slot), or the expulsion and destruction of whichever party was responsible for ordering the attack. We will fight to ZI to defend one member that has done nothing wrong.
  2. um, you forgot that each round has two picks, so an allianced ranked 10 would expect to be in round 5. Halve the rankings or double the pick round before subtracting?
  3. green_muffins: that was hilarious, I take it no one was allowed to pick TOP?
  4. I've always wanted to try some counterintelligence, identify spies and feed misinformation before revealing their allegiance and raining hot death upon them, but I imagine it would be difficult for a spy to infiltrate TSO, and I doubt we have many secrets worth the effort. Plus, without an enemy willing to post our secrets in public(like sponge w/ the tattler), it's hard to know you even HAVE a spy.
  5. At this point i think the answer is the first leader of any alliance in or closely allied to Cit, SF, CnG, or FB that screws up and gets arrogant in negotiations, as that person has the power to start a huge war.
  6. Apparently some people don't know the meaning of "Per NS", it means being huge is a disadvantage. Politically, I'd say any micro alliance with a MADP to a large one. Militarily depends on hidden stuff, but Aircastle wins if they have the warchest, coordination, and activity to back up their wonders.
  7. +8 with all improvements except a couple border walls.
  8. Says someone that's never had an opponent fight back. Oh, and SJ, I suggest we count any ground or air attack that destroys infra as a victory(even if you lose the 1m for a "defeat" ground attack), and for navy, disregard battle support and blockades, as there isn't a roll to determine battle result. Anything else that needs to be addressed?
  9. If morality is the most basic rule to live by, mine is to never deceive myself, to understand my motivation and the goals of others, to be a straightforward friend and a devious enemy.
  10. Hey now, I'm already going to have to temp trade to make up some of the 160k advantage you'll have in soldier efficiency. How about we go by total number of victorious attacks: land, sea, and air? Edit: A defeat alert would count as winning 2 ground attacks, in addition to whatever other ground attacks happen that day.
  11. or i could just post a link to the signature instead of putting it inline.
  12. By *not* giving out my private key.
  13. When's the next barbecue, and am I invited?
  14. if you read my OP, it applies to posts made by other people on my behalf, and to non-CN avenues of communication I would just stick the sig in a spoiler tag if it wasn't against the rules.......
  15. How about damage to other player + loot captured? edit:how about we measure performance by this: score = (3*infra destroyed + 3*land captured + 10*technology captured + 5*technology destroyed) Whoever has high score wins.
  16. your faked message would return this on verification: $ gpg --verify ~/Desktop/nc.asc gpg: Signature made Tue Dec 1 16:02:25 2009 CST using RSA key ID 48229301 gpg: BAD signature from "sleepib (CN) <adv116@yahoo.com>" The original would return this: $ gpg --verify ~/Desktop/op.asc gpg: Signature made Tue Dec 1 16:02:25 2009 CST using RSA key ID 48229301 gpg: Good signature from "sleepib (CN) <adv116@yahoo.com>"
  17. Each message has a unique signature, and it's easy to prove the signature doesn't match the message it supposedly signs. Even if there are only a couple people in each alliance that know how to read a pgp signature, they can verify or refute for everyone. it works like this: a pair of keys is generated, public and private, owned by a specific person. private key and document are run through an algorithm to generate a signature. public key, signature, and document can be run through a verification algorithm to determine if the document is authentic, which is the entire point. (You can use gnupg, or some other pgp implementation of your choice.)
  18. HEY NOW, this is srs bsns! "There is no 'overkill'. There is only 'open fire' and 'I need to reload.'" -The Seven Habits of Highly Effective Pirates, Rule 37 I wonder if I'll get warned if i hide the signature in a spoiler tag.
  19. fine, I'll sign the content of the OP, but you can verify the key on your own: -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 It seems a lot of people get into trouble when they rely on hearsay without bothering to verify authenticity, and sometimes it's not even possible. Therefore I submit a pgp public key for the verification of signatures, and on request, I will digitally sign any agreement I make and any orders I issue. In the future, when a document is posted on the CN forums by another party on my behalf, it shall have my pgp signature. I suggest anyone else concerned about security take the same measures. -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG/MacGPG2 v2.0.12 (Darwin) iQIcBAEBAgAGBQJLFZJxAAoJEAQg0glIIpMBFZsQAKi+3C9M71kDqDnQbDAIjiGx sreSyQ541r0PsLFvix1Ft8PHp+JycOKFa73aqRDQS6kLzr9kjav+d2kx0dxMCGUT lPgG+2w87F415H+kpS27QzumZyOUy7hzsq8y9Kihbkq0OcAFDU6l8jEqwpWK70WQ 3e5ikN8fHxpErB8AeD3Ht+vYf6c0AuS49X/cOpTkVFQIH/Eies+/VckSTO5QcGFP +76te8M8ZXk2qvBJlVnhCPyLzKlfQ2VZKI5/5yGOLuovFJykjuh5fZforQRN6qeS himKiGWhycWLxbGMFZ6vJQIkIaKC/kZORHcUiyIEZq7YngXHqS/Byb5qddebOJ0Y lFzQwYB0OU83Lo0V3menzykzM905YQqnf4AGFH0mNTYtGLF2NdIQKw7K7ll1ze27 xVO+R4Uu/7gBUKQkUhV3m0WpSUazcnimID2yU9xfaVdrMXDLq6oKSncfkrZZ/Q4S xCuWHvFe7pYL0Z3KzGIQCvENXpCSSJYbKtXM4Me3TK+87Rr76jOEnivJ7Mvz+VAb yKXipEOy/3QtlYiyBIj0ViFiX9mDDc+U08u7dq1eYcFhu1tSO+iO2QMAVh5M7PlX U48OUxlQB7F0yxYyg5r4wTQXe2VPc7l1tpdayFcLEecuHAUZfh2ZMow0sHt34DPT WczxnG52BvsUAyRimBfY =qJT0 -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
  20. It seems a lot of people get into trouble when they rely on hearsay without bothering to verify authenticity, and sometimes it's not even possible. Therefore I submit a pgp public key for the verification of signatures, and on request, I will digitally sign any agreement I make and any orders I issue. In the future, when a document is posted on the CN forums by another party on my behalf, it shall have my pgp signature. I suggest anyone else concerned about security take the same measures. -----BEGIN PGP PUBLIC KEY BLOCK----- Version: GnuPG/MacGPG2 v2.0.12 (Darwin) mQINBEsVcKkBEADg9tismxTBJEpehSW1Mtc0PdRr0lWS8aYikDmTEf6Z4HDHC7jP w2NsYOdkkMJ6rWn08MwCN1ZmMugdVjW9UkNJZ7P9asX57MWiHORdYH3p6gBgKq5b o6FOnrV8sIi2eyJMeB8ZivU/UoNLUMA2BSj4YQ2NxxUvdsBnTomeLQTge+XjSw7F z/IMPrlMsmZzXg3egI96LucJBXY4oJCAdorKSjWwMs3o23izSlalqXp6tJxRW28Y U5HrS1Zm9DzjSpFW1HcGSOqmAEBJaDbGwpd2hFzPiUzvOSWgMyqtlVyDde/2LFTw UVtwbhmvu21wHVRb8Q0GmXe8OtkLkk02UZ6K7nMUwgTP3yUTw6nzDaRvvIfWcFJj W+ZPw8RykQphPjsNiAGKjIU/VU+8IBS5/Tgk6PjqvdqaYUZfaKo4lB5CIDL8nRbG b+j0A+yS+RUukD4CkAnR2SHMZqW+usZmTKiIggPthcBR3PCYZFQNE7yQKt80OjIA 76XqCut7UEB2kjVr2Ly6mkD7gxn5qZ0sAiq/LTLlEaNVnGITI/6Jujvk5M0jTG40 biwin5CoAtKR5M8wqMeqkcTtG9M6a2np/srexWcqUx62TlNixkvDffom758vMK7L dkaKJ0gMaEKEwiyQZKxGOGc9UHWkdx3EdUilwvhBx0w15tV8UtiHIlW+qQARAQAB tB9zbGVlcGliIChDTikgPGFkdjExNkB5YWhvby5jb20+iQI2BBMBAgAgBQJLFXCp AhsDBgsJCAcDAgQVAggDBBYCAwECHgECF4AACgkQBCDSCUgikwEDig//VEdAtNZO F0/Jrc3DqBC+9ivTWT83Ukk4YYmsSa0Cr800M5bZduxNhg1IVSprYw2W/W3rD+rq U2sIQWFLlvuq8sDjHG5c/mv0JiggA4flqmpd+juSAeUm4w1lj6MbTBN4xnb9QE1r DiNyuzFbQoOfS3i2RPM1lVKtoTKDLDbwUY3V6RF29IKqnMXxYVVvJBrAjaFfESPS XltZbeybHr0VGhjyzRk5NkPD77I+WfXULMpYkAAykLdxT0EXfqNV1sRbe8cQkFX4 NMEAiQ5saa0xCXZIkyqDii/AC1Nh2n3TRx1hxLJBCH3y2/lnCaIAzzuy2ldqsON4 VWIpKVesVKDHXiYrQIKjPCtTGwwulVrT+3HGUQp/eti+mErh3xsn9vflOag7GD3z P0Xhq2R+Ly+6jN7wu/ENAgTmoyGJT8vCabMOfjHI3GwgprUtx/V6B3AyceDbmsQ2 q51J7ZHSAjTI9t2WayukmPBRJPrSsadaYXkg70+n6kIaVaqzM7fKwVMYXwaKgHsp 34idytIH/sdoO4QaFFYjkuyGPfqU1YJxCRGJBvldhVAX7nCfr0TXCLbGfJonos4m zasXqovIfInqrS3bpCntsHI+4eAdRAvPYZdHbrY1hWOuO9aROAh7T4TacXIbyzK3 2X+2rWxqvSP9hh/OS8AksRUyj6zL64u0mG25Ag0ESxVwqQEQALxwEfPZv3UGQb3o 1aRSfNzxj//+/aAFI5PKXkeqQ3CwlKvctXrxHxBxNj7BG97eR7OgHUoWptMcU+FC Ld171dW4DkkgZOJoGBX6LbB/CuYrox5WlN8+jA06Wo0cr0sxxES7gNTz8y9k4AY8 fUaHa4B4SVjX4h7OswFkVV46LFwyKofzk4nWbwrh/cligpQF+iqriX3zxqNg08q1 8vZ8oA2ZzmXZeU/KViJq0wR2sLKRtyFRc6ZVMFwNRcIilKaN/uNFe34IZJiJMIDw n8wCor/4iHIVFz5tuV4n+lqm++WGXpgMX4AbIwRIXK3Xb+OrCxyUeKqqZcfccosk lQtravTEb6ZQIQnGfskRaKyuE6CTzCEpnXOkuCPsddwTzcDvkL0B2k8hyImnzA5r SZR07vlP0Vdx8vWZ3MnTxHEqlXbIqZw1aLIepvpd7wszoOuYV6gI4ilrGIoPZk/n wm9WROyW9U1rc+Wt7OTHw+w0RknNSbB7zgX1nY+qfsmfpBFtOaiJ9ZH6c80MhWob ZTlLwETaZYBWJABdt1cjgR+0ObR8hxU1tMJgWmQZ8Uqh6eP8Si47jW/8gpbhGyvP YorIh4EsjtzkEYUQ+vlOMq0OnOozn0ikCc4hDb0CzLTq3yq+U2PDtGoBSRJ1iCVb yqgH99rhZt6mhQwQb515qdE+XXE7ABEBAAGJAh8EGAECAAkFAksVcKkCGwwACgkQ BCDSCUgikwHKpw//ZTp4b4yShP1m+lRLKZs6ewM1JVscDDhKKSeWDtkGs/vENQeX CmtoHX/KZj6LCTY/4Vs/30o1pRtB0QjLYIrLsDlFhJkWIe+3UfXPNrxYAoiExmP1 lbGWkW6IA6ls07euaa8YgI9PbRj8wsJ0Sj9puafxwLYFucWYqeVWo+fhpHGnwCn1 WykcjSucCQR9KqyDFB9iWTfCEC+ZFaEnL/MsVwSb9zEPRQ84kFOFp8aP8MKEai3C nHdoB91FkBL9suuW7kqIkWhuXg/drnHqrzblLN+R9CIc1lthFo0hmt661o+8m2mu 68oQfy4lfTvyIeULc6ROxEzq7SV4YXNvGjPLlZy13N5gFUlfcyvlLtMYzSPjvx2/ 7cNLAKHKdcFfQ9Xeke+RvuJFoKs5tJ/X1ezWk1nVVbeY42ldg6ABIkLri4TloSmJ Ou4It1lVYRRzA59+CSXqAzvQJsGmPtL0FqDkjBWPp9dGCwCjaRr8Nyyrnlj12V5Z eLiDUfQmOfkAVbCjYqF2hVmp1z0Xl54ZPvi/pqqQ/hjPz7CVFgOGbf0zLExyTk+H xULqsDZ2/tkQB3lEvOpOpjMP0L85+aoAm3o7EgHvzfEUPLFtVdQ9VILpUpiN9nDT 5aiuiFLVzGmZm9Ic0tDZ+GHHq7uUqJWpejv6vmduXY2rR8OBFu9bRTKc2+U= =JQji -----END PGP PUBLIC KEY BLOCK----- public key mirrored here.
  21. I don't much care about the size of the alliance or the structure of it's government, as long as the membership is elite, active, and tight knit.
  22. Sorry to disappoint you, but we finished paying MCXA about 2 months ago.
  23. [17:46] <SpiderJ[RoK]> hi there [17:46] <SpiderJ[RoK]> I answered you [17:47] <Sleepib[TSO]> hmm [17:48] <Sleepib[TSO]> what's the diff between our nations? [17:48] <Sleepib[TSO]> in ns [17:48] <SpiderJ[RoK]> 10k [17:48] <SpiderJ[RoK]> however, you have 1,5k more tech [17:48] <Sleepib[TSO]> anyone within whatever that is [17:48] <SpiderJ[RoK]> and 10k more citizens [17:48] <SpiderJ[RoK]> huh? [17:49] <Sleepib[TSO]> any of your friends in rok within the NS difference of your nation and mine [17:49] <Sleepib[TSO]> with relation to my nation [17:49] <Sleepib[TSO]> so 81000 ns [17:49] <Sleepib[TSO]> or less [17:49] <Sleepib[TSO]> i'll accept the challenge from [17:50] <SpiderJ[RoK]> hmm... ok... [17:51] <SpiderJ[RoK]> however, I was the one challenged, so I will do it myself [17:51] <SpiderJ[RoK]> even if it means certain defeat [17:51] <Sleepib[TSO]> that's your own perogative [17:51] <SpiderJ[RoK]> yup [17:51] <SpiderJ[RoK]> however, I have one request [17:51] <Sleepib[TSO]> ? [17:52] <SpiderJ[RoK]> and that is that we wait until December 15th... I have 5 exams before then, and update is 7 in the morning for me [17:52] <Sleepib[TSO]> i have to leave on the 22nd [17:52] <Sleepib[TSO]> how about the 14th? [17:52] <Sleepib[TSO]> so it'll be over [17:52] <SpiderJ[RoK]> sorry, exam on the 15th... However, we could do a 5 day battle instead of a 7 day one, so that it fits for both of us [17:53] <Sleepib[TSO]> mm ok [17:53] <Sleepib[TSO]> if you want to use nukes or hold them back that's fine [17:53] <Sleepib[TSO]> whatever you decide beforehand [17:53] <SpiderJ[RoK]> yeah, I would prefer no nukes... It's really no skill in lobbing nukes in a 5 day war [17:53] <Sleepib[TSO]> yeah [17:54] <Sleepib[TSO]> alright, i'll see you then [17:54] <SpiderJ[RoK]> great
  24. Yes, 20 nukes' upkeep is 5.8M/day without uranium, 2.9M with uranium. The initial cost for 20 nukes is 20,000,000.
×
×
  • Create New...