ooc-
Except, as I pointed out earlier, the harsh terms became the fuel to the fire. And, in case you haven't noticed, the concept of revenge has become a popular rationale for Karma nations. If they aren't careful, it too, in due time, may become a popular rationale for Hegemonic nations too.
By my use of the 30's and 40's, I'm implying the point of no return had already been crossed. The damage done by the Treaty of Versailles can no longer be undone, and the result; an even bigger, bloodier war.
This is what I'm getting at, if Karma wants more war, then go for the severe route and try to get blood from the stone. There are consequences to this route, though. It may not happen in 6 months, it may not happen in a year, but, eventually, the aftermath of this war will result in the beginning of yet another war. Isn't this logic precisely a major reason why many alliances are involved in this war? Isn't "Consequences for Your Actions" a major rallying cry for the Karmic side?
But if they want the cycle of war and violence to possibly come to an end, Karma must rethink just what they want.