Narras

I wholeheartedly agree on having a sentence that fits the crime. Placing a PZI is probably the most easiest to implement, but having a PZI with some time limit (what would Planet Bob call these? Timed ZIs?) would seem to be a fair way to go about handing them out. As you have stated, it ultimately comes down to each alliance and how they feel about it. This middle ground for ZIs is an idea that I personally like.

I know the TSO isn't small strength-wise and others have said many things concerning the TSO, but good luck with your new alliance. I hope you have fun. That's always important (well, for me at least).

But, wouldn't this just place a limit on the alliance? If an alliance gave a 1WZI and weren't satisfied with the results, should they change it into a 1MZI or follow through and release their "prisoner"? Wouldn't it be better just to place them on PZI and as Vladimir states, lift the sentence as necessary? This timetable seems to be more of a benefit for the "prisoner" rather than for the alliance, as they would now know just how long their punishment is rather than given an indefinite amount of time.

Sometimes it's nice just to sit back and relax. Enjoy your retirement. Out of curiosity, are IRON Presidents appointed or voted in? or sometimes one or the other? I was just quickly scanning the wiki page of IRON which at one time the IRON Council voted a president in and in this case, it seems to be an appointment.

My comment's a bit off topic, but I loved watching Freaks and Geeks. What a great show.

Congratulations. Most folks don't make it to a second entry...or even a first.

Happy Birthday CN!

Very nice utilities you have there, MrCyber. I'm also interested to read what else you have learned about CN Economics.

Can't wait to read more of Nameless Guy's Exciting Adventures!

Mom! I want to go swimming but, there's an aircraft carrier in the pool. Again. It's not fair.