Lord of Destruction

I went to Zero Infrastructure for Pacifica. Educate yourself. Alongside that, learn that Darkstar has a protectorate with the Mushroom Kingdom, and we will ride to war with them any time we're needed.

Good sir, Trace is indeed speaking the truth. Nations with as much strength as our fine Lieutenant General Teeters were ordered to move to Peace Mode, as the Coincidence Coalition, or CC as they can be called by those who prefer acronyms, was putting certain strategies into use. Since you seem so concerned about education, I wish to inform you that the fine Lieutenant General, who you seem to adore quite a bit due to his extreme strength, is coming out of Peace Mode at update, as update is the soonest he is able to leave it. Thank you for commenting in my simple statistics announcement

Why thank you for realizing that our Lieutenant General, Teeters, has a good nation for warring. I'm sure he is elated that you would give him so much credit for making Darkstar great. That said, had Teeters not chosen to come to Darkstar, this would have been an "Over 100k NS in less than 5 minutes" Announcement. All of us in Darkstar are glad to have him, though.

Thank you very much, Vilien. And may I say, you, sir, have the best war signature I've seen for this conflict.

So today I was checking out Darkstar's forums, and it's public channel, and it's DoE... and I finally came upon the in-game stats. Usually those don't go up really fast for a small alliance, so I wasn't really expecting to see anything great, but then I saw this: Over a quarter of a million in less than 24 hours, as well as over 1 score. I'm very proud of Darkstar right now, even if we're just an 8 man alliance at this point in time. I know that those who're with me in this endeavor will continue working as hard as they are to make Darkstar even better - and not just statistically. Signed, Lord of Destruction, High King

Partially my fault. Sorry

Heh, for a moment, I wish I still had my "Pacifican Scum" sig. Oh well... also, thank you for the well wishes.

I think white peace is fair, considering that whichever side loses will likely have to pay ridiculous amounts in reparations to those who win.

Feel deep, deep sorrow.

Color: Aqua Darkstar - #Darkstar

I can't promise anything

Thank you very much, Cone. It means a lot coming from a good friend like you.

For me, Darkstar started to form around this time, last year. I was having thoughts of leaving the Order to create an alliance of my own, and to be the leader of it. It started at that basic point, just as it does for quite a few alliances in existence today. From then, I put in some work here, some work there. The closest I had ever gotten to actually making Darkstar was in July, when I left the Order. However, due to unfortunate circumstances, I was unable to create it. I chose to join MK instead of quit the game. For a while, I was content being the Baron of Culture in MK - working with applicants, helping with trades sometimes, and even just the discussions that happened in both the private and government channels kept me interested. As time went on, however, I began to have thoughts about creating Darkstar again. This time, I wasn't going to fail. This time, I would make sure it happened. I spoke to Archon, and I spoke to some of my friends. I sought their Counsel. I began to go further in depth with the creation of Darkstar, and here I am today. A great group of friends surround me, and we have, together, Founded Darkstar. Without further ado, I give you the Charter of Darkstar: Our public channel is #Darkstar on coldfront Here is a link to our forums: http://atrumastrum.net/index.php?/index Darkstar is open to any who would like to apply, and we also welcome any foreign diplomats who would like to visit as well.

Did you read the entire section you quoted there? The part you put in bold does indeed say Karma, but it says in general, and then it goes on to say to which alliances the Order surrendered to. If you notice, NPO did not surrender to MK, or to TOP.

Would you rather TPF never released from the terms they were under in the Karma war?

I'm going to call them the Coalition of Absentees for now, and when they show up, they can be the Coalition of Tardiness.

Actually, something like that is generally said in all individual surrender terms announcements. So no, the "circle" is not "complete".

Actually, no, as TPF is at war with Athens right now, and a TPF nation fighting an Athens nation is perfectly acceptable. What's not acceptable would be for that nation to organize a group of people to infiltrate an alliance that isn't fighting TPF and take them down from the inside.

Prevention is impossible. There's nothing they can do to stop someone from pushing the "declare war" button, unless they force you to go into peace mode. They can, however, declare war on the person that raids, or ask them to stop raiding since they're being protected.

They did on the orders of TPF, and then decided, by themselves with no orders from Mhawk, to stop. Then they told Athens about it instead of just taking an upgraded treaty.

No, by using what I said, it is a valid CB against TPF. And to turn it any other way is, well, wrong. I see no reason to continue arguing against those who disagree with this CB when they are ignoring the facts. Have a fine day being blissful.

First off, the Membership of an alliance can be held accountable for the actions of it's leaders, hence why all of TPF is at war, and not just Mhawk. Secondly "all original ZH membership" was, at the time the idea of ZH was created, Government in TPF. "All original ZH membership" were under orders from Mhawk, and therefore were under orders from TPF. This is a valid CB, unless you ignore the facts, and there's really no way to logically argue against it.

The point is that the Cell got created to infiltrate Athens and take it down from within. And the point is that TPF and Athens were never at war. And the point is that said Cell was not terminated by TPF. And the point is that TPF did not inform Athens of a defunct Cell was one of their allies. Put all that together, and you have a valid CB against TPF.

I say 5 because any less than that generally leads to an alliance not really being stable, in my opinion.

It really doesn't matter how many members there are if they have a protectorate... but I'd say 5 makes an alliance, and therefore they shouldn't be raided.