Jump to content

iPBfree


sammykhalifa

Recommended Posts

[quote name='Hyperbad' date='17 July 2010 - 06:52 PM' timestamp='1279407136' post='2376365']
This thread scared me. There were several forums no longer used that are still up as archives. I thought they were lost. Apparently IPBfree got hit but neither invisionplus nor invisionfree were.
[/quote]

Invisionplus looks horrendous

And invisionfree is ran by Invision on Invision Power Board 1.3

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Replies 57
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

[quote name='bros2' date='17 July 2010 - 07:11 PM' timestamp='1279408287' post='2376391']
Invisionplus looks horrendous

And invisionfree is ran by Invision on Invision Power Board 1.3
[/quote]
They're both horrendous and have been since they first came out. Still better than AvidGamers if anyone else remembers using those waaaay back in the day.

Most of the archives were active no more recently than mid 2006 though one forum I have gets used as storage for miscellaneous things when I don't have access to my home computer, a flash drive, or my external. When I get home I back up the data.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

[quote name='memoryproblems' date='17 July 2010 - 05:49 AM' timestamp='1279342176' post='2375500']
nah, phpbb3 is obviously best :P The majority of online communities agree :) , according to [url]]http://www.backendbattles.com/[/url] on a survey of the top 10k sites as ranked by Alexa, vBulletin is top, but phpBB is used on more top 10k sites (28 of them) then IPB (18) and SMF (6) combined.
[/quote]
phpBB is ugly. I prefer the look of SMF or IPB.

Losing IPBfree is a disappointment because not everyone who plays this game has the ability to pay for hosting, but stronger communities will survive and move on.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

[quote name='Katsumi' date='18 July 2010 - 11:40 AM' timestamp='1279467629' post='2377271']
phpBB is ugly. I prefer the look of SMF or IPB.

Losing IPBfree is a disappointment because not everyone who plays this game has the ability to pay for hosting, but stronger communities will survive and move on.
[/quote]

namepad.net is a good free host when they are accepting signups

Link to comment
Share on other sites

[quote name='Katsumi' date='18 July 2010 - 10:40 AM' timestamp='1279467629' post='2377271']
phpBB is ugly. I prefer the look of SMF or IPB.

Losing IPBfree is a disappointment because not everyone who plays this game has the ability to pay for hosting, but stronger communities will survive and move on.
[/quote]

To be honest, they all look pretty horrible with the default styles, but thats why there are hundreds and hundreds of free forum styles out there for each of them. phpBB3's default style is pretty advanced (tableless, it was designed with web standards compliance in mind, its default style is W3C compliant both to CSS 2.1 and XHTML 1.0 strict, I did a check on MK's forums, it has errors on both CSS and XHTML, and the CN forums have even more errors, although these might be due to issues done when doing minor work to them.) phpBB3's default style (prosilver) is an amazing style in terms of its structure, and has served as an amazing base for hundreds of styles which alot of people (myself included) find very attractive.

Edited by memoryproblems
Link to comment
Share on other sites

[quote name='memoryproblems' date='18 July 2010 - 11:07 PM' timestamp='1279508815' post='2378209']
To be honest, they all look pretty horrible with the default styles, but thats why there are hundreds and hundreds of free forum styles out there for each of them. phpBB3's default style is pretty advanced (tableless, it was designed with web standards compliance in mind, its default style is W3C compliant both to CSS 2.1 and XHTML 1.0 strict, I did a check on MK's forums, it has errors on both CSS and XHTML, and the CN forums have even more errors, although these might be due to issues done when doing minor work to them.) phpBB3's default style (prosilver) is an amazing style in terms of its structure, and has served as an amazing base for hundreds of styles which alot of people (myself included) find very attractive.
[/quote]

well duh I didn't design the MK forums to be pretty, I made it so they work :P

Here's a SMF installation with no mods:
http://validator.w3.org/check?uri=http://www.cnupn.net/forums

This document was successfully checked as XHTML 1.0 Transitional!

http://jigsaw.w3.org/css-validator/validator?uri=http://cnupn.net/forums/Themes/default/css/index.css

Congratulations! No Error Found.
This document validates as CSS level 2.1 !

Link to comment
Share on other sites

[quote name='bros2' date='18 July 2010 - 10:22 PM' timestamp='1279509750' post='2378255']
well duh I didn't design the MK forums to be pretty, I made it so they work :P

Here's a SMF installation with no mods:
http://validator.w3.org/check?uri=http://www.cnupn.net/forums

This document was successfully checked as XHTML 1.0 Transitional!

http://jigsaw.w3.org/css-validator/validator?uri=http://cnupn.net/forums/Themes/default/css/index.css

Congratulations! No Error Found.
This document validates as CSS level 2.1 !
[/quote]

I figured mods were probably the cause, but still, its only transitional :P

But yeah, functionality is certainly more important then appearance.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.


×
×
  • Create New...