metal Posted January 4, 2009 Report Share Posted January 4, 2009 (edited) Wow... impressive. I now understand why NAAW's tone changed towards me in the last 24 hours. No wonder you guys wanted peace so bad. Here I thought it was cause I had grown on you. Edited January 4, 2009 by metal Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
BluRaider Posted January 4, 2009 Report Share Posted January 4, 2009 Black Team Unity ftw Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Blacky Posted January 4, 2009 Report Share Posted January 4, 2009 Welcome to the fray. :v Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
King Death II Posted January 4, 2009 Report Share Posted January 4, 2009 War, whats it good for? Also good luck to our allies. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Seth Muscarella Posted January 4, 2009 Report Share Posted January 4, 2009 dang, that was fun, guys! i hope i can say many more times that the current #2 TE guy lost a ground attack to me at a fair cost to him. CURRENT being the key word here. when i look back on it, i think i won almost as many attacks as i lost :-) o/ battle, because it brings a smile to my face :-) Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Burning Glory Posted January 4, 2009 Report Share Posted January 4, 2009 I happen to think this is sad, one friend fighting another friend and it keeps getting escaladed to this, soon to be more i'm sure as i have checked the MADP treaties and it appears they also have friends. So i ask where is this going to solve anything, every nation in this game raids...period! I have my own opinions of how this could of been different and myself tried many times to get this to stop....just read back through the post! In all fairness i have seen many post by NAAW to try for peace and BW just keep turning it down, along with my offer to be a peace broker. TPF has many friends and Genesis is one of them, we even had an MADP on the table with CDT, and i personally made friends with boomer from mash last round, and all of this is why TPF members have never raided any of them. TPF values its friends and their sovernty (if thats spelled corectly) But even though we do not have an MADP with NAAW, we still have friends among them as well, and friends amoung their allies whom we do have an MADP with. So i ask every friend and nation and leader involved in this to stop this here and now before this turns into the worst war in TE history! TPF is being put in a hard place with this, and we would like to see this resolved quickly, hournably, and peacefully! As stated before i'm willing to broker the peace deal, and peace need to start somewhere! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Seth Muscarella Posted January 4, 2009 Report Share Posted January 4, 2009 (edited) Wow... impressive.I now understand why NAAW's tone changed towards me in the last 24 hours. No wonder you guys wanted peace so bad. Here I thought it was cause I had grown on you. wait, do you mean how 4 alliances came against us and we only have 15% nations in anarchy from it? is that why we have been nicer to you? what is that, like 25% of the nations that attacked us in this update? good job guys. *clap* *clap* we're shaking in our boots right now metal, i'm glad you refused all peace opportunities for this. come the end of the week, you will see why we were giving you every opportunity to get out of this. o/ NAAW! EDIT: stupid misspelled words Edited January 4, 2009 by Sethly Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
BluRaider Posted January 4, 2009 Report Share Posted January 4, 2009 (edited) wait, do you mean how 4 alliances came against us and we only have 15% nations in anarchy from it? is that why we have been nicer to you? what is that, like 25% of the nations that attacked us in this update? good job guys. *clap* *clap* we're shaking in our boots right nowmetal, i'm glad you refused all peace opportunities for this. come the end of the week, you will see why we were giving you every opportunity to get out of this. o/ NAAW! EDIT: stupid misspelled words The anarchy count was last updated 9 hours ago, before the war began, so expect the anarchy rates to rise. + What is up with the wars nowadays, it's like 3-10 alliances dogpiling on 1-2 alliances. Edited January 4, 2009 by BluRaider Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Zikawe Posted January 4, 2009 Report Share Posted January 4, 2009 wait, do you mean how 4 alliances came against us and we only have 15% nations in anarchy from it? is that why we have been nicer to you? what is that, like 25% of the nations that attacked us in this update? good job guys. *clap* *clap* we're shaking in our boots right nowmetal, i'm glad you refused all peace opportunities for this. come the end of the week, you will see why we were giving you every opportunity to get out of this. o/ NAAW! EDIT: stupid misspelled words Anarchy Count: 66/134 = 49.25% It's only slightly more then 15% Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
metal Posted January 4, 2009 Report Share Posted January 4, 2009 wait, do you mean how 4 alliances came against us and we only have 15% nations in anarchy from it? is that why we have been nicer to you? what is that, like 25% of the nations that attacked us in this update? good job guys. *clap* *clap* we're shaking in our boots right nowmetal, i'm glad you refused all peace opportunities for this. come the end of the week, you will see why we were giving you every opportunity to get out of this. o/ NAAW! EDIT: stupid misspelled words For what it's worth, I never refused peace. The black-hearted grinch-like figure of Shade and Coalition had a pow-wow, came up with some top secret plans I guess. I wasn't in on any of that. Believe it or not. o/ NAAW and the most profitable raid in history! ... oh wait... Hey look at it this way, earlier you said you had 40 nations as personal tech farms, that number increased exponentially, you should be thrilled! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
BluRaider Posted January 4, 2009 Report Share Posted January 4, 2009 This war is probably the most controversial and interesting in TE history. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
metal Posted January 4, 2009 Report Share Posted January 4, 2009 Anarchy Count:66/134 = 49.25% It's only slightly more then 15% It's "NAAW Sethly" ! WE HAVE NO NATIONS IN ANARCHY THE CAPITAL IS SECURE Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Hyperion321 Posted January 4, 2009 Report Share Posted January 4, 2009 Well that was certainly an interesting 26 messages to log in to. I guess it's my turn now. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
KingDingaLing Posted January 4, 2009 Author Report Share Posted January 4, 2009 No we wanted peace not because of the coalition, but because There was no need for infra to be lost over a guy thats no longer playing the game. (insert my talk about attacks after peace) <-- It could have been solved there. And it could have been solved today when I tried to work an agreement with BW, but no, they had to drag four other alliances in, that are going to lose infra as well, then we drag people in and there friends join in etc.. This was pointless and brought on by stubbornness. Its not good for anyone and not good for the black sphere. But it is good for WAR ! so have fun Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
metal Posted January 4, 2009 Report Share Posted January 4, 2009 No we wanted peace not because of the coalition, but because There was no need for infra to be lost over a guy thats no longer playing the game. (insert my talk about attacks after peace) <-- It could have been solved there. And it could have been solved today when I tried to work an agreement with BW, but no, they had to drag four other alliances in, that are going to lose infra as well, then we drag people in and there friends join in etc.. This was pointless and brought on by stubbornness.Its not good for anyone and not good for the black sphere. But it is good for WAR ! so have fun Archnemesis Bill, Your losing your touch. If only you guys would have had this mindset PRIOR to it getting dangerous for you. Like the 28th when BW nations were peacing, and 6 aggressive wars followed. Right about somewhere in there would have been a great place to have this mindset. You know.. before launching the nukes, and before the spy attacks. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
KingDingaLing Posted January 4, 2009 Author Report Share Posted January 4, 2009 Archnemesis Bill, Your losing your touch. If only you guys would have had this mindset PRIOR to it getting dangerous for you. Like the 28th when BW nations were peacing, and 6 aggressive wars followed. Right about somewhere in there would have been a great place to have this mindset. You know.. before launching the nukes, and before the spy attacks. Well that would be what we did metal remember I was the one that initiated peace. Your guys didnt peace on the 28th as weve discussed they kept attacking. The 28th was there declaration date. I really hope anyone that has played this game for more than a day realizes that. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
metal Posted January 4, 2009 Report Share Posted January 4, 2009 but no, they had to drag four other alliances in, Oh and.. from what I hear via underground correspondence with the black-hearted Shade no "dragging" was necessary. I was even like "nah, we got this". But apparently your "side" isn't coming across in the best of light through all this. *shrugs* Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
metal Posted January 4, 2009 Report Share Posted January 4, 2009 Well that would be what we did metal remember I was the one that initiated peace. Your guys didnt peace on the 28th as weve discussed they kept attacking. The 28th was there declaration date. I really hope anyone that has played this game for more than a day realizes that. The 28th WAS the declaration date. The 28th was ALSO the date that Shade received and granted your requests for peace. BW soldiers follow orders. Peace was either in the box or on its way I'm sure. We do see all those wars did peace. The bigger problem (and irrefutable portion) is the 29th and 30th - those six aggressive wars look mighty bad on NAAW. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
KingDingaLing Posted January 4, 2009 Author Report Share Posted January 4, 2009 They wanted a reason for a war. There like a horse with blinders on. No matter what I said they would still be gung ho with this great master plan of theirs ! They can view us how they need to to justify themselves thats fine. Atleast I got an Italian dinner out of this Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
metal Posted January 4, 2009 Report Share Posted January 4, 2009 (edited) They wanted a reason for a war. There like a horse with blinders on. No matter what I said they would still be gung ho with this great master plan of theirs !They can view us how they need to to justify themselves thats fine. Atleast I got an Italian dinner out of this Are you suggesting we're just pawns in "their" great master plan? Because I'm not sure "they" could have counted on an alliance our size sticking up to an alliance your size. Maybe it just worked out right. I feel used. Hey - you also got a Archnemesis. Don't forget that. Edited January 4, 2009 by metal Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
popsumpot Posted January 4, 2009 Report Share Posted January 4, 2009 Are you suggesting we're just pawns in "their" great master plan? Because I'm not sure "they" could have counted on an alliance our size sticking up to an alliance your size. Maybe it just worked out right. I feel used.Hey - you also got a Archnemesis. Don't forget that. Didn't you know? We fully made NAAW raid you, nuke you, attack you some more and flame you. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts