Jump to content

Junkalunka

Banned
 View Profile  See their activity

  • Posts

    982

  • Joined

  • Last visited

 Content Type 

Posts posted by Junkalunka

    Announcement from someone you thought was dead.

    in Alliance Politics

    Posted

    Ford, when you say fourth in command that normally means the Military Executor.

    Ruling Council:

    Emperor

    Grand Vizier

    Regent

    Executor

    Chancellor

    Executor himself was head of the military department and was fourth in command of the alliance. You were not at all in a command position of the entire alliance but merely rose to the position of IRC deputy, which was the subordinant General position.

    In terms of succession, you would not have even been a potential Emperor, the line of succession goes through the various IRC members. The only way you could have become Emperor was if the Executor resigned beforehand and then the council members above you declined the emperorship.

    Indeed, you only became General (basically the assistant to the Executor) because starfox stepped aside to lead the Security Bureau as part of staffing reorganization. And this when the IAA's military was literally being blown to pieces.

    Technically you were second in command of the Imperial military for a spell, Chaos could have replaced you at will and you were not in any sort of alliancewide command position.

    Announcement from someone you thought was dead.

    in Alliance Politics

    Posted · Edited by Junkalunka

    I don't imagine 4th in command of IAA would have been very difficult, to be honest.

    Fourth in command? As I remember he was just an officer who got promoted to General, and that itself was just a subordinate command that was only vacant because starfox resigned.

    Ford was never a member of the Ruling Council.

    And think he has a very shallow view of IAA and why we disbanded.

    Ragnarok Declaration of Support for the NPO

    in Alliance Politics

    Posted · Edited by Junkalunka

    DUDE! your alliance is huge! I'm sure in your 21 days of esistance gave you ample time to know everything about Ragnarok. To answer Wiess question, i do believe the end of days is held within the new CN powerhouse and Junkalunka is their leader :v: lolreroll

    Well I rerolled my nation but have always been Junkalunka, indeed my original nation was Neo Waianae and was a nation for 400+ days. I was Emperor and Regent of IAA, so I'd say I have a pretty good grounding in CN politics.

    It's ok, we ALL take you seriously while you're hiding in peace mode.

    I am not in the mood for constant warfare anymore, 1,000,000 casualties with my old nation, believe me I've done my share.

    Also, if an individual don't take someone seriously because they're in hippy, I don't take them seriously. ;)

    Ragnarok Declaration of Support for the NPO

    in Alliance Politics

    Posted

    We are allies with NPO, and we support our allies. Since when has supporting your allies become a bad thing? It doesn't get any clearer than that.

    Why do you need to support your allies now? Would you support them if they were about to be crushed (dont bother answering, I know you'll say yes. :rolleyes: )

    P.S. Nice nation you've got there. I see you've already managed to get on somebody's bad side, through trolling I imagine. :awesome:

    Nope, you have no idea whats going on actually. :lol:

    Ragnarok Declaration of Support for the NPO

    in Alliance Politics

    Posted

    I quote the above as an example of poor and mundane trolling. Note the example's lack of alliance and infrastructure which leads to spite and hard feelings towards an individual or entity, thus clouding his judgment and making his point moot.

    I quote the above as an example of poor and mundane trolling.

    Note the lack of familiarity the subject has with his target. Indeed, this individual has no dealings with Junkalunka and therefore does not know how he operates and thinks, nor the measure of his character.

    :awesome:

    Also, feel free to actually point out where my reasoning is false.

    Ragnarok Declaration of Support for the NPO

    in Alliance Politics

    Posted

    I find it disappointing that people are offering so much support to the NPO from outside threats, when it is quite clear that the alliance that is under the most threat is NpO, I see no one threatening NPO, and therefore find these declarations of support unnecessary. I believe a true ally of the NPO would now be offering them help in solving thses issues within their government, as well as with the NpO.

    This isn't meant to troll, I am just observing a sad fact about all the nations who have offered support for the NPO, and offered no support to NpO for the threats against it

    They don't actually support NPO.

    They only "support" NPO because they want to curry favor with the dominant faction. NPO doesnt need support; they are not threatened. Polar is the alliance that really needs support, and because of that it is harder to find.

    If Polaris was dominant we would see a flood of support for them, from many of the same people "supporting" NPO's leadership ;)

    De Profundis

    in Alliance Politics

    Posted

    That may be so, but a Pacifican is entitled to his personal beliefs even if they are slightly askew from perfect Francoism. You're citing one person. Is this person the Order?

    I think his point was, my friend, that people like this control the Order. ;)

    PAIN Declaration of Support

    in Alliance Politics

    Posted · Edited by Junkalunka

    I have no intention of repeating the same back-and-forth that has been going on in other threads here. I know you're more than capable of reading the evidence my comrades have presented.

    I find it odd that you see fit to lecture me on blind loyalty. Remind me again why SOLID sided with the NpO? Ah yes, because of a treaty, nothing more. That is blind loyalty.

    I have read evidence from all involved parties and more besides, there were wrongs committed by all parties it seems (although one more greivous than the other, perhaps) so alliances allied to Polaris have three options:

    *They can stand with their allies and friends, and do what they feel is the right thing...

    *They can take an reasonable stance if they actually believe Polar is wrong and go neutral...

    *They can stab Polar in the back and maneuver against them.

    Re: To Admin

    in Open World Forum

    Posted

    NPO be careful, he might admin bomb all of you, then mass chaos will Take Down CN as a massive power struggle for control of CN ensues, The Server will crash, the Forums will crash in the mighty struggle, and when the Great War ends, Admin will bestow upon the NPO all of their infra again, and NPO will plant it's flag in the ashes of Planet Bob, and Will say "lol dey blew demselves up, Does this mean, we win the game, again?

    You're doin it rong. :P

    Re: To Admin

    in Open World Forum

    Posted · Edited by Junkalunka

    Revenge Doctrine only holds as long as Pacifica is able to enforce it. ;)

    May admin have mercy on your souls, and please for the sake of the children read the Akallabêth!

    EDIT: fixed for spelling ;)

×
×
  • Create New...