Ketther

[quote name='Jens of the desert' date='11 February 2010 - 11:18 PM' timestamp='1265923132' post='2175492'] Nice PR move, there, TOP. [/quote] I know about sides and all but you might want to read ALL the posts. Juz' saying

Besides people correcting you just as you write your post, I don't think our presence on the OWF is anywhere near the bragging and history changing themes.

I'm sorry we came so late for the party

[quote name='harmoxe' date='03 February 2010 - 01:26 PM' timestamp='1265196374' post='2156259'] Welcome to the fight. Little know fact: the ordinary men would have won in Thermopylae in only two days, and there's only 24 for them. :-) o/ OMFG [/quote] That may be, but sometimes you have to be good AND look godlike Welcome to the fray gentlemen

Thou shall not post in anger. Enjoy the war.

[quote name='Urmom(U)' date='01 February 2010 - 07:56 AM' timestamp='1265003813' post='2149881'] I have no clue lol, STOP RUINING MY FUN! I was speaking in terms of the 35 mil to 80 mil that the war is currently at. [/quote] And it's so obvious that TOP's average NS makes it so easy for 75% of the other side to attack it. Way to compare the raw numbers and whine about it.

Who are you talking to DL? I am just receiving static... I'll wait for someone that knows to answer you Wentworth. One thing I know though. If we would have hit TOP I would have had no fun. So I'm cool with the way things are now

o/ ADI Oh wait... it spreads Anyway, Anu, thank you for sharing that It sort of confirms my suspicions. With that being said - and I know that pretty much noone on Planet Bob cares about my opinion - I'll close the Warbuck chapter in my mind. The hole he dug himself in is so deep he doesn't need anyone else's help to dig deeper. Good luck with anyone putting faith in a word you say again dude.

Oh well, I guess my diagnostic was correct. Good luck out there.

You are getting more and more fabulous by the minute. I guess welcoming you back was just postcounting for me... I wonder if Alyster bit you in your wanderings outside of Sparta.

This is getting blown out of proportion

Was this before or after the DoS? Just checking

"ADI will grant the requests of their allies in NATO, Invicta and FEAR, and will provide public support, financial support, and military support if our allies choose to call on us." Might have sounded better with a "WHEN" Juz saying'

IF("Allies call on you",IF("You actually decide to honour treaties",IF("You get within RoK's guns",IF("You get within my range",IF("My bosses let me","I'll meet you on the way down Warbuck")))),FAIL) An announcement made of conditional win

Wouldn't that make him a rogue? I think there is a difference between tempting them into a fight with no (legal) consequences and risk getting sanctioned, ZI'ed.. whatever *Bleh, I'm slow.

I would have thought that posting in an \m/ apology thread would at least point your guessing in a more unbiased direction.

I think you missed the Also, Sparta: This is Spaaaa... oh wait

It pains me to say so... but I think he was actually sarcastic. Maybe he should lead ADI, as it is clear this one knows what sarcasm is. /edit or was he ironic?

I think you guys need a reality check. Your current influence sphere should have provided enough irony. Or not.

And also, i thought it was an optional attack but maybe I am mistaken.

Well, finally some interesting reading with a very nice OP. That aside, I'd like an answer to something that rubs me since this whole thing started. I always thought that power comes packing with two interesting stones tied to its feet : Responsibility and accountability (If I messed up the words, consider this bit of text an apology). Now I admit I am pretty new to ruling a nation but what I see around is mostly a lack of those two stones when alliance leaders have thier plans blowing up in their own faces. What I want to say is this (this will apply only to mhawk, because frankly my experience doesn't allow me to make character judgments on most of the people around - except Warduck): If you are caught with your pants down, why don't you have the guts to say "Yes, it was dumb. Ok, you found out. Dude, I did it and it has NOTHING to do with the rest of my alliance. It was a long time ago, I was young and reckless, so if you want to dish some hurting... do it to me, and me alone." You might say that this is dumb, but ZI'ing a nation will never mean the same as losing 1 million NS across the entire alliance. Also, it would negate the whole point of the war AND help you (if your enemies decide it would be fine to still roll your alliance) get so much support from outside your treaty web that your attackers might be sent home with their heads spinning. Another interesting side effect is that it would make you pretty much a hero inside your alliance so building your nation back might not be that hard. Where is the harm in losing an argument while keeping your self respect and being an honourable leader?

Before all this happened, I though ADI had two options valid to get shelter from all the political fallout. The classic King's side castle - I mean merging into FEAR. After all they chose a side after wanting claiming to be neutral so why not go all the way. The slightly dumber "Oh look, someone stole my pieces" - "admit" you've been hacked, blame it on someone already banned and go back to being neutral. Now I just want to start the "Help Warbuck buy a spine" Fund.

You'd think someone working at the "Warbuck school of politics" would understand sarcasm. And also, I thought you were neutral. But anyway, I think I'm done trolling ADI. Here's to hoping you won't get in ROKs way next war >_> .

Because it is obvious the way DoWs went that you would have had to join ROKs side. But hindisight is a bummer eh?

And still it was accepted AFTER you all geared up for war. I see where I am wrong in this and I apologise. I'll just stop posting.