Jump to content

Emporor

Members
  • Posts

    352
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Everything posted by Emporor

  1. [quote name='magicninja' timestamp='1281663668' post='2413608'] No, he blatantly lied. [/quote] Magic careful where you step... I was asked not to post screen shots and logs.. but you're pushing it. Learn what you are talking about before your mouth gets GATO some more bad PR. Run along now kiddo.
  2. Short, simple, and not so sweet... 72 hours ago, ICAN notified GATO that we would be canceling our protectorate with them. The truth is.. GATO is not the same GATO we used to know so long ago, nor is it the GATO that we signed the ICAN protectorate with just a few months ago. We have come to separate. We wish our brothers and good friends in GATO the best of luck. Signed, Emporor; President of ICAN P.S. Gibby is still AWESOME.
  3. I have remained quiet on this topic because I didn't want to go and give our plans away, but hell... Its not like all of CN doesn't already know where we stand, by looking at our treaties. I was the first to inform GATO that NSO was about to get a beat down(I was probably the first to know outside of SF), and I was the first to ask them for their support in the campaign against NSO if we were thrown into this through our treaties(And yes, I am stating that we did/do have intentions of rolling the NSO side of this war if it escalates).. therefore, GATO would not be inclined to help the NSO in anyway due to the fact that obviously as CN knows, protectorates are far more important to most alliances, than some screw up MDP partner. While I do NOT condone the actions of GATO for the way that this was handled, as I have told many of them in private channels, I will support my ally as I would support any other ally. I do not, see what the big deal is here to begin with. Obviously, GATO would not have gotten involved in this war for NSO even had the treaty not been voided out. To call GATO and/or her allies idiots over this, just shows that you have no idea of what you are talking about. I am sure this post won't change much, as most of you are to idiotic to know when you are wrong and when to shut up, so please carry on with your miserable lives. That is all.
  4. TENE, let me teach you guys something. Hopefully you will take this knowledge and use it wisely. When you are being bullied politically, as you are now, over war, the best thing you should do is make your point here on the forums and shut up. No point in arguing as it will not do any good.. Just give, or take, your beating and be done with it. I promise you will get more enjoyment out of it.. and in the end won't be butthurt over the general CN bullying. There is a time to respond and a time not to respond. What I am saying is, you are making yourselves look dumb, and weak, by arguing with NSO and its allies. Let your nukes(If you guys even have nukes) do the talking.
  5. Ouch.. an MDoAP... D: Good luck to you guys.
  6. Congrats to all, though I'm not to happy about who all is in this govt. May you find your way back to the top, yet again. o/ GATO
  7. [quote name='Tarikmo' timestamp='1280593866' post='2396040'] I like your style. [/quote] Oh, thanks. I always say what I think and how I feel..
  8. If you have tech to sell, let us know at http://cn-ican.co.cc or, just post here with a link or, you can message one of the nations below. We have a business man mask for anyone who isn't a diplomat for your alliance or for anyone who doesn't have an alliance. Here is a list of everyone who needs tech 90,958.657 [url=http://www.cybernations.net/nation_drill_display.asp?Nation_ID=160206] Apocs Realm[/url] - Apoc04 64,825.106 [url=http://www.cybernations.net/nation_drill_display.asp?Nation_ID=182853] Seanipheonikorn Land[/url] - Kittyquel 53,658.212 [url=http://www.cybernations.net/nation_drill_display.asp?Nation_ID=142356] les idiots[/url] - dskid807 44,044.212 [url=http://www.cybernations.net/nation_drill_display.asp?Nation_ID=66397] Manussa[/url] - manussa 27,680.157 [url=http://www.cybernations.net/nation_drill_display.asp?Nation_ID=314892] pr0n st4rz[/url] - xplicit313 20,861.747 [url=http://www.cybernations.net/nation_drill_display.asp?Nation_ID=312850] SoA Republic[/url] - SoADarthCyfe6 14,044.446 [url=http://www.cybernations.net/nation_drill_display.asp?Nation_ID=329624] Winners[/url] - Emporor All tech deals are defaulted out at 3 mil/100 tech. Thank you all for your time. Signed, Emporor; President of ICAN
  9. [quote name='Captain Flinders' timestamp='1280129155' post='2389488'] An alliance-wide retaliation would not be the the result a raider is looking for. Quite the opposite actually. Therefore, looking for a target that would not fight back (at least in that extreme fashion) wouldn't make them cowards necessarily. It would make them smart raiders. [/quote] Wow, you are probably the best argument yet... but, being smart in this case.. makes them cowards. But, I agree with you, to a certain extent. They are ignorant however to go around picking fights with alliances such as MA, who could roll them.. so lets not give them to much credit.
  10. [quote name='Gravitate Rogue' timestamp='1280118037' post='2389290'] Holy crap stop your posturing. If you know it wont happen then shut up. This thread is not about you asking them to attack you. [/quote] No, no it isn't.. but the fact that the thread is here, and it appears that they want to shove other alliances around gives me and every other leader in CN the right to call them out and you better believe I will.. but since a member of LOLValhalla wants to get involved, I'm just supposed to stop? Lol. Get real. How about you sit down, shut up, and take notes. kthxbye.
  11. [quote name='Penkala' timestamp='1280109923' post='2389155'] Because GOONS is fine with raiding aligned nations. All they need to do is stop the raid after their 2 attacks and walk away and say 'k our bad' then do it again the next day, get their tech, walk away and say 'k our bad' again. This has been going on for MONTHS. There are no consequences so why should they stop? [/quote] That's because the cowards won't raid an alliance that would fight back.. I'm still waiting to see GOONS stand up to my challenge. I know it won't happen because they aren't completely ignorant, just mostly.
  12. [quote name='Moridin' timestamp='1280094020' post='2388731'] Let me get this straight. Being something of a spectator here, I would appreciate if either side can clarify what I interpret as the events in this raid: [list=1][*]GOONS members find no information indicating Soldiers of Legion is a protected AA after taking reasonable steps to find such information.[*]GOONS proceeds to raid Soldiers of Legion.[*]CptGodzilla informs GOONS via IRC that Monos Archein is protecting Soldiers of Legion.[*]GOONS states they will finish the current round of raids but not re-declare.[*]CptGodzilla informs the general public via these forums that Monos Archein is protecting Soldiers of Legion.[*]GOONS offers peace.[/list] Is this correct, or am I missing something? [/quote] Hit it on the head.. What I can't understand is this, what makes you GOON members think that the AA wasn't protected? I mean, it says that SoL merged.. but, I fail to see when the said merge was to have happened, or to what extent the AA was to be protected. Now before you start jumping on that last sentence, lets hit this point up. It has been argued and won several times that an AA that merges into another alliance belongs to that alliance.. so as far as I am concerned or anyone else in CN, the SoL AA belongs to MA.. EXACTLY where do you guys have any right at all to raid that AA? Even if it doesn't state that it was protected, it does basically state that the AA is owned by MA.
  13. [quote name='Haquertal' timestamp='1280092872' post='2388701'] Who cares if you know them? There was no public documentation, which is why the raid was conducted in the first place. If they had taken the proper steps, just as our raiders do, then it would've never happened. [/quote] Yes because your raiders took all the right steps but, if that is true then why are you guys in this mess now? It's always everyone's fault but your own.. I think it's time to take responsibility for your actions, don't you?
  14. [quote name='nippy' timestamp='1280090650' post='2388639'] Hahahaha....ah, man. You're hilarious. [/quote] Oh yes, so hilarious.. you guys are getting called out and apparetly you are so pathetic that you won't even do anything about it... yes, that is hilarious. [quote name='Haquertal' timestamp='1280090652' post='2388641'] I could say the same thing to you, kind sir. [/quote] Don't try to reverse the fact that you guys are complete idiots and can't even pick on an alliance that is willing to stand up to you.. what's wrong? We are only a tenth of your size according to your fellow member. [quote name='nippy' timestamp='1280091558' post='2388671'] You're out of line, Hoo. We don't go about dictating your alliance's policies to you, so don't do the same to us. We're not obligated to end raids on unprotected AA's, so don't act like we were. [/quote] Oh yes, he is so out of line.. because you would never go and tell any alliance to what extent they can protect their allies (Which would be that alliances policy) now would you?? Oh, wait.. you guys already did. [quote name='nippy' timestamp='1280091558' post='2388671'] If you have issues with our policies, feel free to discuss them with us. You calling us 'complete morons' on the OWF not only makes us not care about your opinion, but it ensures that your posts will be regarded with less seriousness in the future. [/quote] Yeah, because who ever takes Hoo seriously, am I right?
  15. [quote name='nippy' timestamp='1280088734' post='2388598'] We're about 10 times bigger than you are and we don't push you around due to your treaties. You're an AA with ties, which makes you quite safe from techraids. [/quote] Which backs up my point that you guys only pick on those you think you can push around... Quite farankly, You don't have to worry about our treaties.. as it would cost you enough just by attacking us alone, without our allies. [quote name='Haquertal' timestamp='1280089074' post='2388607'] Is that why when people screw up, the wrath of Bob, so to speak, comes down upon them from our .gov? Chill out on the [/quote] So wait, you guys don't like getting called out for your stupid mistakes but, yet you like to call others out?? So not only do you act with stupidity, and act cowardly, but you also are hypocritical? Wow... way to go dude. Just keep talking.. you guys are looking so cool right now.
  16. [quote name='Haquertal' timestamp='1280087986' post='2388579'] Because starting huge wars is cool, right? [/quote] Lol, you guys would be the one to start it for acting with extreme stupidity.
  17. [quote name='Iserlohn' timestamp='1280086967' post='2388562'] We count the wiki as "public", which is why it was a surprise that CptGodzilla posted this thread. Simply quietly editing something into the wiki would have been fine. Oh well. Also, our members do in fact already follow an [b]extremely[/b] high degree of due diligence. For the raided AA they are required to check the wiki, OWF, [u]and[/u] IRC. Likewise for any listed active protectors in the raided AA's wiki or OWF info. We do not require them to ask on IRC whether a private unannounced merge implies de facto protection. The question here is [u]not[/u] about due diligence, as you implied, but rather whether the inactive remnants of a merge implicitly retain any of their treaties. I personally don't believe so, but I can ask our gov whether there is room for compromise in that stance. Still, it should be noted that GOONS will honor private protectorates if this fact is politely communicated to them, but we do not believe in retroactive protection. This means that in this case and similar cases, our compromise position is to let current wars expire, declare no new ones, and put them on our permanent raid immunity list, which is exactly what was offered, along with the [i]suggestion[/i] that the OWF or wiki contain a notice of this. I praise Beefspari for her perfect handling of the situation. [/quote] Oh, so I see what you guys do now... You basically set your own policies which can be contradicted if you guys choose to do so, and everyone else in CN has to deal with it, like it or not... I am surprised that you guys still exist. Pathetic if you ask me. I agree with Hoo on this one, Cpt was WAY to nice.
  18. [quote name='Haquertal' timestamp='1280082618' post='2388485'] As long as you posted it on the forums, then you're fine. It's not like I'm saying add it ONLY to the wiki, but the more places you add it is better. Also, nice smuggo smack talk. [/quote] Oh, yes because it's not like MA doesn't have the treaty posted here on the forums... heh. And there is more where that came from, maybe you should come take care of that?? Oh, that's right... you guys only attack those weaker than you, or those you think you can push around. I'd call that a cowardly act.. wouldn't you?
  19. [quote name='Haquertal' timestamp='1280028573' post='2387964'] Nice to see this added somewhere. Don't forget to append to your wiki, as well. [/quote] That comment almost made me want to go take the info of our protectorate down off ICAN's wiki... would you guys come knocking on our door?? I think not.
  20. What's this... I don't even... Someone should roll them?? D: Good luck out there.. when you officially create.
  21. [quote name='Jgoods45' date='23 July 2010 - 12:53 AM' timestamp='1279860819' post='2385452'] It's only because my allies are involved in said drama. I like to be entertained and the drama you cause is always entertaining. [/quote] Entertainment is mah game. Besides, if we didn't have drama going on... who would come visit us? Not everyday you see a small 17 man alliance's chan full of people.
×
×
  • Create New...