Timtacious

This is thrilling.

[quote name='Jorost' date='22 July 2010 - 09:10 PM' timestamp='1279850990' post='2385170'] Just to be clear, this was never really meant to be a secret. In fact we told many friends and allies what we were planning quite some time ago. We just wanted to wait until we had a sufficient contingent of members on Red before we "transferred the flag," so to speak. [/quote] Yeah, this wasn't opsec, he PM'ed me when they first were considering it, and I wasn't even there anymore ^.^

Double post

[quote name='USOFAA' date='22 July 2010 - 05:00 PM' timestamp='1279836016' post='2384870'] Growth is mine as of now want to be a big nation. You do buy the tech in the price of tanks and troops and Infra when they fight back. I worked it out a bit back i will see if i can find it.But its something like this, If your over the 200 Infra mark and the person has 20 or under tech all the the person that your raiding has to use is like 5 or 6 Cruise Missiles and you don't make any money. Not a dime so is there a point in that unless like 4 out of 5 don't fight back i just can't see it. A little pointer if your being tech raided turtle let your troops die don't replace them. Buy as many Cruise Missiles as you can and make them pay for your tech.The last thing a tech raider wants to get into is lets drop each others chart war. Oh and keep as many aircraft as you can. Unless you think that you can take them. But if its someone like GOONS ect just do the above plan becuse they will get back up [/quote] I lol'ed. Buy as many CMs as possible? Turtle? I think you're secretly trying to help raiders by screwing over anyone listening to your advice [quote name='Sandwich Controversy' date='21 July 2010 - 10:06 PM' timestamp='1279767956' post='2383909'] I don't see the announcement of them moving to red but that doesn't mean they haven't done it [/quote] Done.

I for one welcome our new Red overlords.

Good luck!

If it's a question, shouldn't it be "Why has Nintendo Won"? Also, o/ PS3

Ugh, another dropout. Any sugary fish now?

[quote name='Matthew PK' date='29 June 2010 - 01:04 AM' timestamp='1277791440' post='2353662'] To this day I do not understand why you think we would demand reps or try to humiliate you. I will not accept a "white peace" as if you were on equal standings. [/quote] The answer to the first sentence is right there in the 2nd. Why do we think you'd demand reps? Because white peace is "unacceptable" You HAVE to be just feigning idiocy, right?

So I need to look at dates

[quote name='We Are Not Alone' date='07 June 2010 - 12:10 AM' timestamp='1275887426' post='2327458'] On a sidenote we brought in 126 new recruits and its been a great process meeting so many new people and teaching them the ropes of this crazy place we call planet bob [/quote] Similar to M6: How many of these 126 members will give a crap about [insert treaty partner's name here] if they have to sacrifice their noob nations? Especially if you let them vote, they'll bail on anyone. 126 outnumbers the 5 or so people who meant what they said about a madp

[quote name='ChairmanHal' date='05 June 2010 - 10:45 AM' timestamp='1275752708' post='2324575'] Numerous alliances had conflicting treaties during that war. They chose a side. UPN chose to buy popcorn and sit in the bleachers. Don't paint it as anything even remotely noble. Living on technicalities will only get you through so much on Planet Bob. Even your own government finally realized this. [/quote] They didn't buy popcorn, silly, by sitting out they saved a ton of NS and got sanctioned. [quote name='Torito' date='05 June 2010 - 04:38 PM' timestamp='1275773889' post='2325024'] I recently left UPN as well, and its incredibly funny how ignorant people like you, Alterego, are about the situation but how much you seem to be furious about it. UPN has always been an alliance that prides itself on being transparent, open, and democratic. Of course this is not always the case and sometimes causes people to leave. After realizing the gravity of their situation, the UPN government decided to put war to a vote among the general membership, many government members voted for war on iFok, FCO, and other fronts in the war, [b]but the membership overwhelmingly chose neutrality.[/b] If the government had chosen to go to war with either side in this conflict they would have essentially shown a big middle finger to their members. No doubt mistakes were made, going back much further than the actual war mistakes were made in UPN's foreign policy, but I for one applaud UPNs decisions in that war, because its an excellent example of UPNs commitment to its OWN MEMBERS above commitment to loud, obnoxious, and ultimately meaningless agitators like you. o/ UPN, may you live up to your founding principles more and more each day. [/quote] And obviously your members (apparently mostly low NS ones, since you had very few nations that could aid after the war), didn't value the treaty. Which is unsurprising, since they didn't care. In other news, I remember being attacked by RoK and SLCB, and not ODN... in fact, I didn't see anyone from ODN attacking Invicta. I mean, really? No DoW on Stickmen, when they pulled a massive stretch on their treaties because they wanted so desperately to hit us? At least 1 or 2 members didn't leave us to fry, they joined Invicta for the war because they didn't want to hide in a corner. edit: [quote name='Kalasin' date='05 June 2010 - 06:59 PM' timestamp='1275782368' post='2325319'] *shrugs* I don't see how this disproves my point. If anything, it means that ODN understands the difficulties of having conflicting treaties. UPN, don't feel bad that people are hatin' on you. Like someone wise once said: "You have enemies? Good. That means you've stood up for something, sometime in your life.” [/quote] They stood up for something? Man, that quote is sure irrelevant here

Hooray!

New Sith Order is the most evil http://www.newsithorder.info/phpBB3/index.php

Take me out, sorry.

So I go directly to a gov position while in a democracy? Easiest way to become an incumbent ever! Edit: Why isn't my smiley showing up?

No sugary fish around?

Just need fish/sugar!

Bump

http://www.cybernations.net/nation_drill_display.asp?Nation_ID=324410 iron/uranium

Mega-bump for great justice!

[quote name='Matthew PK' date='14 May 2010 - 10:35 PM' timestamp='1273894499' post='2298292'] Well now that "the precedent" has been set everybody can stop complaining about it. [/quote] Right, so the precedent with unconditional surrender is to demand a whopping one tech. There may be some outcry if you have the audacity to go 100x over this, but I think they'll cope.

[quote name='Jorost' date='09 April 2010 - 06:29 PM' timestamp='1270859351' post='2254799'] Er, Timtacious, we [i]did[/i] withdraw from Poseidon! It's PEACE that we're still in. /me sighs. Heh. Also, just to be clear, "Regnum Invictorum" is the full, official name. "Invicta" is still the standard short-form name. It's like the difference between "La Republique Francaise" and "France." [/quote] Okay, sorry for not reading announcements fully

[quote name='Micheal Malone' date='09 April 2010 - 06:20 PM' timestamp='1270858821' post='2254781'] Interesting. I wonder why the sudden about face? So, TL;DR: Name change UPN Treaty Change [s]Withdrawl from Poseidon[/s] Did I miss anything? [/quote] Fixed that for you.

o/ Regnum Invictorum