Jump to content

Derantol

Members
  • Content Count

    225
  • Joined

  • Last visited

About Derantol

  • Rank
    Advanced Member

Previous Fields

  • Sanctioned Alliance
    Independent Republic of Orange Nations
  • Nation Name
    CaVala
  • Alliance Name
    Independent Republic of Orange Nations
  • Resource 1
    Lead
  • Resource 2
    Rubber

Contact Methods

  • Website URL
    http://
  • ICQ
    0

Profile Information

  • Gender
    Male

Recent Profile Visitors

233 profile views
  1. [quote name='Gopherbashi' timestamp='1343533816' post='3016589'] [font=Courier New][b]Dave's War[/b] July 27, 2012 - Day 44 --------------- [b][u][size=3][color=orange]Dolan[/b][/u] [/color][/size][/font][font="Courier New"]• 457.00 --> 456.54 ([color=red]-0.46[/color]) [b][color=orange]•[/color] [color=orange]Continuing Alliances[/color][/b]: 457.00 --> 456.54 ([color=red]-0.46[/color]) [b][color=orange]•[/color] [color=orange]Incoming Alliances[/color][/b]: 0.00 --> 0.00 ([color=black]+0.00[/color]) [b][color=orange]•[/color] [color=orange]Outgoing Alliances[/color][/b]:
  2. [quote name='im317' timestamp='1343343474' post='3015896'] there isn't exactly a cap for GRL. global radiation = (total nations hit by nukes * 300) / total nations its peaked for this war due to the limited number of nukes you can buy although its going to have a few sharp drops when its been 30 days from a large front peacing out. [/quote] Actually, the theoretical maximum is 300; If X is total nations, then (X*300)/X=GRL, and X/X=1, so then you get 300. Or there's the cap at 5, but whatever. EDIT: This came off really snarky, and that's not how I mean it. I'm also too lazy to fi
  3. Perhaps I'm alone in thinking this, but would it make more sense to group the two wars now, or leave off the LSF war altogether? It's pretty clear to most, I think, that the LSF front isn't going to expand past what it already has. The loss to IRON's score is going to be almost exclusively caused by Sparta, or so I would hope, so the LSF front is going to generally be represented by inaccurate or misleading stats. No biggie if nobody else agrees, just thought I'd put that out there.
  4. Any tl;dr for those of us who don't have time to watch it yet? All I'm getting from your post is "FUTURE SOON" and a vague reference to what could be referred to as another industrial revolution, and I don't have time to watch the video at the moment.
  5. I fully agree with jerdge - but I think it's also important to differentiate between slander and genuine criticism. In this particular case, it doesn't look like there's any confusion; one comment of encouragement should never draw this sort of fire. But I think it's also important to be able to level with someone and tell them that something is wrong with what they're doing. That sort of thing is becoming harder to do in our society because so many criticisms are taken as insults somehow. I guess I'm saying that any system supporting free speech should especially protect critical speech that
  6. [quote name='Nikita Ilyich Lenin' timestamp='1337074863' post='2967659'] Can we outsource our econ to you. [/quote] Roq, you should consider doing this for small alliances. Walk in, help them set up a tech program, and leave a guide behind. I don't think anyone doubts your ability to get tech running.
  7. Not knowing how many streaks go on for how long, would it be possible to perhaps display all streak above a certain threshold? Or, alternatively, simply a top 3 or top 5 streaks in length? I don't get a lot of meaningful information when I just see streak updates every 5 days - that means five different updates to check to see who is on a streak right now.
  8. Since you'll be in the neighborhood anyway, I hear Forks, WA is a great center for paranormal... stuff, anyway. And Bigfoot is supposed to live in Washington or British Columbia, I think. Right?
  9. [quote name='jerdge' timestamp='1331630016' post='2937535'] Like you needed that to get on top... Wouldn't it be the first time, for IRON, BTW? I can't imagine another alliance which had that potential for that long, and that didn't reach it yet: I guess that such a long "delay" will just make it sweeter! Or, I don't know, on April 1st we could announce your comeback to neutrality and the merge into the Independent Republican Agency of Nations for the Protection of Green Oranges... [center][img]http://28.media.tumblr.com/tumblr_lh9b17fnKh1qcptm2o1_500.jpg[/img][/center] [/quote] Te
  10. A friend of mine wrote this essay for a class that he took called "Confronting Moral Dilemmas." It's pretty funny - read past the first few paragraphs for the better parts. For what it's worth, he got an A on this paper. At the beginning of the term, I felt as though I had a coherent grasp on many concepts concerning morality. I have strong opinions concerning many of the issues mentioned in the course catalogue, and I was excited to take a class which would focus on moral dilemmas and allow me to explore concrete examples of controversial issues. In that capacity the class has been very help
  11. [quote name='shahman' timestamp='1329885059' post='2925407'] I think more than once-a-week all alliance would be too much. I'm against it. Also, I like the new format. A++ [/quote] Both of these. Though I might be biased somewhat, given that my alliance is in the sanction race anyway :V
  12. No, they won't even break 150 nations. But they will (assuming a perfect merge) get up to just over 20 score.
  13. What makes you say this? I won't argue that these values are normally important, but I know that I can cite at least one clear example to the contrary (Vox Populi) and several you could argue have set aside these goals, at least as they are presented here, for the sake of doing something else. And there are examples of alliances that more or less aim for these goals and yet still suffer - I'll offer up TDO as an example. TDO, at one point, had several hundred members. They have hovered between 100 and 200 for some time, while other alliances, such as IRON, MHA, and NPO have maintained much hig
  14. What is your personal opinion on each of the sanctioned alliances? In what ways might each of those alliances improve?
  15. [quote name='Great Lord Moth' timestamp='1325060143' post='2887874'] What GOP is doing with the Sanction Race. If I made that dream alliance of mine, my goal would be to do it with ten or fewer members. @.@ [/quote] Well, with the current score at the bottom, each nation would need to be worth 1.13 score or so. I'm not sure of how much NS that is, but it's a lot.
×
×
  • Create New...