[quote name='Tromp' timestamp='1297876725' post='2635748']
It is opportunistic because apparently LoSS (and TIO) had a standing white peace offer from their opponents.
Bringing in DT on Legacy, the least connected alliance, was thus not necessary, yet LoSS opted to escalate the war they were in.
To be honest I think it was LoSS who were being unreasonable at first, but it seems DT will be held accountable for choosing to go along with it.
[/quote]
This is also a falsehood being continuously reposted, and it needs correction.
CSN only offered a "partial peace" to the Loss/TIO front, as evidenced by the logs posted. If you're Loss, you don't accept peace for just yourselves in a group effort.
So this "token" peace offer can't have been taken seriously, and it seems perfectly understandable that if peace isn't an option, you call backup. That's how DT entered, not because we were trying to snipe a "cheap shot" or "opportunistic player-hating".
Get yer facts straight please! It makes my head hurt seeing these posts with little to no substantiation.