Hermes

Yes, Troll.

Everyone bash on Tyga. ^ New Trend since NPO isn't worthy anymore.

Hey man, im pissed off at the world because im not getting enough loving from the Aut for taking his heat atm. Ehh bad troll you. I think you know what i meant, no need to reiterate it with changing a few words. o/ The Dark Side of the Moon

Dude, loosen up a bit. An example of the Karma !@#$...you don't mean the fact that you are doing the same thing NPO did, you just have a reason that got you some good PR. do you? Note: i am not condoning anything NPO did. Just saying your doing the same thing.

How is it different? They are forced to defend the NPO via a treaty. Something they take very seriously. If NPO went on the aggressive, they are allowed to. When the attacks were made against NPO, that brought them into this war, not the NPO declaration on OV. To me it makes no difference that NPO started a war. They were declared on and that is what brought TPF into the war. Could it have been avoided? yes but NPO is NPO and they $%&@ed up.

No, im pissed off at the world. Bullcrap=your "Karma" !@#$.

And you have a problem with Aut having an agenda to push against Karma, just like you had an agenda to push against NPO. Give me a break, you are a hypocrite. If you can't take it that someone opposes you in a game, i worry for you irl. Yes NPO started this war, and they should be punished for that. But should TPF? TPF simply honored a treaty, defensively i might add. Once NPO was attacked, TPF honored the defense clause in their treaty. If they would have been on the agressive against OV then you might have a point. Until then, please stop trying to pin this on the initial attack on OV in which TPF was not involved. With you going around spitting out !@#$%^&*, i don't blame Aut one bit for going after you.

Yes because double posting is completely my fault and doesn't have to do with my !@#$%* wireless interwebz. Spy ops on the owf is awesome because you suck and wouldn't be able to do anything with it anyway. RyanGDI, still full of fail.

Double Post RyanGDI, you are still full of fail.

I will eat you both... You fail at everything you do... Big...lol

Aut, if you don't kick the !@#$ out of Ryan i will hunt you down and then i will eat you. just saying...

The next time, will there be a revenge group to come and take it all away, again?

Stumpy is a monster.

lol @ ODN trying to talk smack

That is how many soldiers of yours that died on the attacking end. Defending is how many soldiers died on the defending end. Total is the combined number.

I contradict my original post? Yes because giving you the perspective of what i believe the NPO was thinking is definitely the same as my opinion on what is right or wrong.

[9:30pm] Gen_Lee: -NPO has five days to move all their nations out peace mode with zero penalty. [9:36pm] Gen_Lee: oh for record sake, clock starts now 5/21 11:38 server time Clock starts for the 5 days until all the nations have to be out of PM.

i didn't miss the point, i just don't like hypothetical scenarios.

If you got Umbrella to attack me i would laugh then fight. Sorry that my numbers aren't so dear to my heart Are you saying that i would rather see an alliance say im bored, i want to attack you rather than making up a completely BS cb...you would be right. You are also right that Might doesn't make it right to use that might, but people use it anyway, i guess we can blame human nature for that.

Thank you for calling me as blind as a bat. Defending a treaty is all and good with me but obviously NPO thinks differently, perhaps they believe the alliance who is defending a treaty partner is also condoning the "reason for war" that NPO has used for their attack. Note: Defending NPO is harder then it looks.

To the NPO, the ones giving out the terms, they were not innocent, hence the DoW. At the time of the events, each alliance looked guilty of something (not saying i agree with most of the crap) but from the perspective of the attacking alliance(s) they did look guilty, as the NPO does now.

So apparently, if i am getting this correct, the terms are based off previous terms that you didn't agree with, but you are now condoning these terms? Yes, giving them equally "bad" terms as they have given to other alliances is Karma, but will a form of Karma not come for you now? You might think it is different, but it is not. You are still giving !@#$ terms and people will still oppose them. The cycle will continue as long as you let it. Hermes

Good Luck to you both.