Jerichoholic
-
Posts
172 -
Joined
-
Last visited
Content Type
Profiles
Forums
Blogs
Gallery
Blog Comments posted by Jerichoholic
-
-
lol, you just posted this b/c it was easy
It was actually more annoying than most because I had to remove/comment out a lot of the stuff.
Wraps things up for OBR/Blackwater-TORN: http://forums.cybernations.net/index.php?showtopic=83776
Works for me. But now that there are only 2 nations left at war, there isn't much point in posting a new image.
-
Didn't OBR/TORN peace out a month ago or so?
According to a TORN member:
On Blackwater and OBR v. TORN, a de facto peace exists on that front and a de jure peace will be announced separately at a later time, as I understand.
-
VE in on TOOL?
-
You had to add all the ridiculous ones just to discredit the non-ridiculous ones. Lame propaganda.
I wonder what alliance you are in
-
MK did 9/11
-
i thought Legion and TPF had surrendered yesterday. and Menotah surrendered today.
They surrendered after my update, it will be reflected in the next update
-
He's right, your face is atrocious. You should be ashamed of yourself!
-
You forgot to add CSN and GO, who are both still fighting NSO (CSN defensively and GO offensively).
Thanks for all the work you've done updating this.
For the 49th time, different front/war/whatever.
Notice it says "TOP-CnG War" and not "NpO/\m/" or "Second Unjust War" at the top.
-
Oh, and yes I know Silence and CRAP are up top and not fighting anybody. I'll remove them in the next update
-
I'll add those two changes once I verify them.
Still missing the Misfits DoW on NpO
I didn't forget them. They were under 10 nations when I was removing all the micros. My drop line is 10 nations and my add line is 20 nations (so I don't have to keep removing/adding nations that are right around a certain number.
-
Those men weren't brave, they were mercenary scum who deserved a quick and brutal death!
-
IE7 i think
You really need to upgrade. IE8 is out or (even better) get Firefox or Opera.
IE8, Chrome and Safari all have unpatched vulnerabilities which make them a target for exploitation.
-
Apparently I'm "gay, lols!"
Some people see that, I don't.
I have no idea why it's doing that
-
LOL at the NpO-TOP line.
I have no idea why it did that, but I thought it was hilarious too...
good job here...
Do you use illustrator to do that ?
Cause I was wondering how you manage all the update... you have to change everythin by yourself (or is there a network software who decide to move things) ?
Cause my war web (url under) is rather different from yours and i wondered how you did it ^^
I use graphing software on one of my servers.
You forgot to add NEAT with the attack alongside SOS against Hydra. We declared same time.
I get declarations off the wiki, it wasn't there when I made this
You're added in for the next update (as is SLCB's new declaration)
Could you add a tl;dr at the bottom for us mods?
Ha, I'll see what I can do
-
pfft chart has no OTS and therefor no TGH.... they had more than 10 when we started
Declare on a bigger alliance!
-
I finally got around to cleaning this one up a bit
-
Preemptive reply, Jack?
-
I'll just add that you saw a lot of white peaces with no reps because most of the people fighting had no bad feelings towards each other. It was more "unfortunately we're getting dragged into this stupid conflict" rather than something more vicious as we've seen in the past.
-
nice job! Can/has anyone made up a list of Nations and N.S. between the two blocks? How even or uneven is the war?
CnG's side is about 50% bigger last I checked. It was something like 150mil ns to 100mil ns
-
This web flow chart I can follow much easier
Thanks for organizing it better
Yeah, the webbed version was getting to be unmanageable.
CSN remains at war with NSO.
I'm only counting wars from the second war/second phase of the war/whatever you want to call it
-
like the work but have a question: what is with the different line colors? If they are to indicate which day a specific alliance came in, can you add a legend as well?
appreciate the work you put in!
The different line colors are there just to help differentiate between sets of declarations (ie vs FEAR, TOP, etc) so that it's easier to tell them apart when overlapping.
Cyan/Blue is the general theme for the CnG side and Orange is the general theme for the TOP side.
-
It would look more organized if you made C&G the center, TOP and Co. a ring around that and then all the C&G allies on the outside. Good work though.
I could do that, but it would make it look really messed up with a bunch of arrows crisscrossing each other. Think this but worse since it would be jammed all closer together.
-
May I ask if you used a network software ?
And really a nice add for people who like the stats side of wars !
THX !
No, I used some graphing software on my server.
Very nice, thank you.
The Irony of GATO hitting on this side without IAA is quite ironic. Gato lives up to the reputation once again, I hope they live up to the rest of it.
GATO is hitting TSO, IAA is hitting DAWN
-
TJO declared on TOP and TSO, not on TORN and TSO.
Updated, thanks
All those T acronyms start blending together after awhile
TOP-CnG War Web 2010-04-05
in Jerichoholic's Blog
A blog by Jerichoholic in General
Posted