Aeternalis

Honourable: Invicta Immoral: \m/ Amoral: Goons Isolated: NPO Entangled: Athens Powerful: MK Incompetent: NSO Nice: ODN Mean: \m/, NSO Friend: \m/, RoK Enemy: NSO Respected: RoK Annoying: NSO, MK

just remember the cardinal rules of CN success: 1) hate \m/ 2) call GGA "fail" 3) be really weird around 'girls' on IRC

Ominous, considering how the last alliance that attempted this went down in the flames of prodigal_bilrow

darn, i recruited only the inactive members of tR

but nothing about your hidden, under-ground nukes?

ok, irony highlighted. But i'll let you in on something: it's not going to stop or change

My foremost point should be, "why the $%&@ does it matter where anyone in a disbanded alliance goes?" Great! You're telling a former leader of a defunct alliance that actions speak louder than words. So sue him. however, since you're obviously such a great judge of character, i'll let you lambaste Tailsk with comments about how he gave advice that may not necessarily be good for him, but for others

guys, please be nice

and i think we are confused why so many people seem so wronged by this particular OADP. I mean, i find no problem for your confusion, only with the reason this debate is in this thread.

yes please. spices and iron

what is the age of that drummer?

as a free market freak, i'd agree too

you can go ahead and test that out, then.

I think you'll find that i'll (we'll) back up my/our OADP partners a lot more than most will

all i get from this is a massive "riveting tale, chap"

you guys, stop being mean and talking behind backs. NUN matters!

Sometimes, when i play call of duty in my oval office, i just sit and wait for those darned Japanese soldiers to talk it out with me so we can all go home happy and merry, and it's best that no one DARE play differently than me, lest i tell them how much no one likes them

congratulations on this maneuver

i think looks more like a tribal warrior with it's hair up. Some e-situations call for an emoticon that says "LOL, they're trying to swindle our land from us"

(B <-- please take this one with it. too many times i have wanted to put something in parenthesis that started with B and it turns out to be this smiley. (B oner)

dear god, SCM, how could you eventhink we would allow close to even sides? no one ever goes to war without knowing they will win first. very few people in this game really have the ability to start something with global consequences. I hate that "do something about it" !@#$%^&* because if i "did something about it" it would probably just lead to my rather insignificant alliance being curb-stomped by some 100 members alliance. yawn.

I'll give the platform up for all those who wish to voice their opinions about this war and how about people shouldn't start potentially epic !@#$ if they aren't going to finish. I'd post my rage now, but it would end up as an incoherent page of, full-caps, crap. So maybe if i don't kill myself in a climax of anger and disappointment over this war, I'll join you in mob-style rage. Let 'er rip! PS - this one is for you, Ejayrazz edit - $%&@ I SPENT TWO !@#$@#$ WEEKS ON THIS !@#$%^&* ALL FOR !@#$@#$ NOTHING!! FFFFFFFF WORST WAR EVER

only if i can put in peace mode nations per offensive war.

Oh, you.. this isn't a DoW

ffff. please don't make me do more work