Moridin
-
Posts
4,592 -
Joined
-
Last visited
Content Type
Profiles
Forums
Blogs
Gallery
Posts posted by Moridin
-
-
In fact the MCXA needs people like you and KP, because the more we get trolled, the harder we work. And the more unified we get.
MCXA made demands of Polar once Polar had been completely isolated for grievances that occurred well before to their isolation; that's opportunism if I ever saw it. One day you will threaten the wrong alliance and get what's been a long time coming. Maybe if I keep posting you all will be motivated enough to be something slightly better than utterly incompetent in the art of war when you finally are attacked.
-
No, it wasn't a reference to any secret surrender terms, but merely a hint that the relations of 2 alliances will never improve if people treat their (ex) enemies like Penchuk treats us. As a result of that, further conflicts are unavoidable.
But what does Vox know about relations with other alliances.
Further, we are far off topic, don't you think so?
We are not off topic in the least, we are discussing who should be rolled and why. I am saying MCXA should be rolled, you are making veiled threats at Penchuk and now Polar as a whole.
Are you saying that you would simply ignore Penchuk's violation of the secret surrender terms Polaris is under? That would certainly be very nice of you, though I doubt it's in your nature to do something of the sort.
And what is the point of Polar and MCXA having 'improved' relations? Clearly relations can be wherever you want but you'll still throw them aside in favor of improved connections to someone more powerful. MCXA is an alliance of opportunists and backstabbers.
-
I said neither of what you are putting in my mouth, but yeah, I love your unqualified overreactions.
Oh yes, your earlier post was not a veiled reference to the secret surrender terms.
You're not fooling anyone.
-
NPO, Valhalla, ODN, 64Digits, Ragnarok, GGA, TPF, DefCon, Gramlins, IRON, TORN, Sparta, MCXA, Echelon, TOP, and VE.
Also, my best wishes to you KP.
-
Among others, IRON, Legion, ODN, GDA, and UPN.
-
The 5th of November? I understand you are trying to get at something, but I suppose I am just to stupid to understand. Sorry for being slow on the uptake?
He's trying to paint you as a Vox sympathizer.
-
Why thank you Moridin.
o/ GGA
o/ Valhalla
o/ Treaty Upgrades.
Why the eye roll? I was being serious.
-
You two were practically made for one another. Congratulations!
-
Every destroyed peace of Vox infra is a victory.
And I doubt they had any trouble with you.
Actually, a number of Vox Populi members made quite a profit off of wars with ODN.
-
Just because one of VP's active members is smart enough to realize that VP will never win, you turn against him?
He left us, not the other way around. I find it disgusting when someone who has given up talks as if he is still in Vox in an effort to get others to surrender.
-
Given up on what? What exactly are you guys trying to accomplish anymore? Sure, when you started you had all these grand, idealistic notions and goals, but those seem to have been reduced to just sniping on the forums. If you shoot enough, I'm sure you'll hit a few targets, but what are you actually working towards anymore? Judging from Doitzel's last response, it doesn't look like he's even trying anymore. He used to be one of the best posters here, and he's ability to rouse the rabble was undoubtedly one of the reasons your movement gained so much steam in the first place. But not so much anymore.
That's because your Minister of Intelligence's post was so unbecoming of his office that there wasn't really anything to argue against. It was a long drawn out "no u".
If someone left IRON in the midst of a war, and afterwards asked other IRON members to surrender because "it is futile for us to continue", would you let that slide? Would you accept the implication that he speaks as part of IRON?
-
I'm aware I quit, but I recreated just to address this. Quite the bickering. It will accomplish nothing but prolong the conflict for those who want peace. Now I'm not saying I like it, or that it's even fair, but it is what it is and nothing can be done about it. Let's just quit while we can. This isn't going to accomplish a damn thing. I'm sure you all understand that not all Vox wants to fight forever. Say what you will about it, but I don't know. Just because some of us don't deserve peace doesn't mean the rest of them should be forced to share our fate. The fight it is lost. In fact, it was lost long before we even fought it. It's futile to for us to even continue.
Us? You have given up already. You have no right to use that word when speaking about Vox.
-
I am amused with Vox's attempts to raise any sort of argument at all.
You fail miserably.
Like I said before...Good show GGA, show no mercy.
Tho, its hard to beat them down when they all hide in peace mode and won't put their Infra where their mouths are.
After a bit of research, I discovered that GGA actually has more peace mode nations than Vox, being the only sanctioned alliance in this honored position!
Really, the whole "put your infra where your mouth is" argument is nothing more than meaningless posturing; it is asking us to submit to the policy of 'might makes right', as if the fact we have fewer nations and less strength somehow invalidates what we are saying.
-
Not even the final pages. Look past the physicality of the alliance itself and see what it's done for the forums. It'll take a long time - if ever - before the forums are the way they were again.
Ah yes, the good old days when every topic, every announcement, was simply mindless hailing. I am sorry I ever took part in so bland a 'tradition' as just posting a hail as if it meant anything to anyone.
-
Best luck to those Vox who decide to go their own way.
If I am on the no-surrender list, I thank you for this honor. If I am not, then I spit on your terms.
-
Wait, "you have no treaties" is now a justification for attacking an alliance?
Makes one wonder why GPA hasn't been attacked again.
-
Not surprised there's further dodging of the issue when it comes to one of your founding member's class.
Your question was asking me to judge someone based on alleged ToS violations for which you provide no evidence at all and go as far as to state you are unsure even happened. Added to your apparent failure to report to the said violations to the proper authorities for reasons we can only speculate on, were you honestly expecting anything different?
-
Sure: How does Vox Populi feel about having Schattenmann in their ranks, knowing (or maybe not knowing) the many things he "may or may not have done" that are direct violations of the rules of the game?
ToS violations are under the jurisdiction of admin, not Vox Populi. I am sure he would appreciate your forwarding of any information regarding such violations. Until that time, I'm afraid your questions has nothing to do with Vox Populi or its members.
-
This paragraph defines Schattenmann right here. If it weren't a ToS violation, I would have a field day going off about all the things you've pulled off, past and present. I think the games Schattenmann plays on a daily basis feeds the climate of ZI, Perma-ZI, EZI, etc. more than anything else, and continuing his actions seriously thinking that it'll change anything is so incredibly funny and sad at the same time. Fight fire with gasoline, I guess. Works every time.
You get my nomination for biggest hypocrite in Cybernations.
Could you please re-phrase that in question form?
-
1. Vox Populi
2. Global Alliance and Treaty Organization
3. Mushroom Kingdom
4. Federation of Armed Nations
5. The Gramlins (Though they are losing some good members.)
6. Greenland Republic
7. =Western Empire=
8. Green Protection Agency
9. USN/CSN
10. The Order of Righteous Nations (Simply for giving people White peace.)
I dispute your list; the STA belongs there as well.
No matter how many diplomatic ties Vox severs from the NPO, some sort of military action will have to be taken to truly bring them down. Obviously Vox can not accomplish this, so what do you plan on doing?If enough ties are cut from the NPO, the world will see that they are not as formidable as they are considered to be now. We seek to show illuminate that truth.
Also, what was the point in going to war with the NPO when you could've done this spy thing in the first place? You knew you couldn't win, so why did you try when your current spy plan could've been used instead?There seems to be a common misconception that, however many times we say otherwise, seems to persist. This misconception is that this whole Vox Populi thing was really thought through thoroughly in the beginning. It was intended to be 11 people having some fun before we left the game entirely. It grew into something that could actually be called a real alliance, and since then we have begun spying on major alliances.
Anyway, we declared war on GGA and Valhalla, not NPO; I believe the NPO entered against us once they realized we were voting in the senate.
-
Upset NPO, with the Bollywood CN History a close second.
-
Let me get this straight. You enter the war because you want to fight against NpO. You got what you asked for. Where's the issue?
-
Degenerate108 will lead the Imperial Green Colony to glory.
-
I've never heard of devoting a thread to two people surrendering. Perhaps Old Guard is looking to regain face by mercifully letting two people surrender after a month of war?
What alliance(s) would you like to see rolled
in Open World Forum
Posted · Edited by Moridin
Certainly not. Merely a desire for justice to be done upon you and your alliance.