I was thinking of a little question that is always on the back of my mind... How could we define a change in alliance policy ?
You see, i'm not that naive, i understand that objective criteria can't be used here. There will always be people to deny any change in their enemy behavior... but there is surely some clues as to how one can describe a radical change ?
This question is motivated by a series of practical cases inspired by the CN history...
- What did indicate to CnG that ODN changed ?
- Why are a lot of people still bringing back valhalla's 2 years old stories to decide that "they havent changed" ?
- How will people decide that NPO has changed enough to their taste ?
- How will Purple change according to the belief that "lolpurple has to stop" ?
I know PR stunts rarely work, I see everyday people arguing without ends, I recently saw a dramatic and objective "negative change" (o/ Gramlins) but positive ones are very rare...
Just some thoughts.... ayou may have history I havent heard of "change" (negative and positive) that occured in CN and hence having some explanations for my little questions above. Comments welcomed here or in PM for sure !