Jump to content

ERA - USA Treaty Announcement


Andover

Recommended Posts

[quote name='Omniscient1' timestamp='1285809563' post='2469038']
No clue. It was said earlier though that was the reason the treaty was dropped.
[/quote]

If ishabad's bio has anything to say about it, it's Silver Fire Alliance, who are themselves a protectorate of TPF.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

[quote name='Uralica' timestamp='1285810358' post='2469049']
If ishabad's bio has anything to say about it, it's Silver Fire Alliance, who are themselves a protectorate of TPF.
[/quote]

Yup:

[quote]Preamble
The Silver Fire Alliance (SFA) , in order to help fellow micro alliances out, will protect United States of Alliance (USA).
Article I: Sovereignty
SFA and USA are to remain separate and sovereign. This pact is to increase friendship between the two undersigned alliances.
Article II: Communication
Both the undersigned agree to have open communications with each other through forums, ingame, and on IRC.
Article III: Peace
Neither alliance shall attack each other in any form.
Article IV: Protection
SFA agrees to defend USA, whether it be politically, militarily, or financially.
Article V: Conditions
[u][b]SFA will protect USA until USA has more than 4 members under their AA. When this happens, USA must look for a new, larger, alliance for protection.[/b][/u]
USA shall not have any wars against any alliances that have 2 or more members under their AA. Tech raiding nations who have no alliance affiliation is permitted.
USA shall do tech deals with SFA at the rate of $3 million for 100 tech.
[u][b]If USA gets more than 4 members, or breaches any part of this treaty, it shall be nullified[/b][/u] a
Signed for SFA

Signed for USA
Ishabad


Protected by Silverfire Alliance[/quote]

They have four members now. Treaty is void now.

Found on their forums.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

[quote name='Uralica' timestamp='1285820352' post='2469333']
Time to headdesk again.

USA, Why on earth did you put a membership count clause into your protectorate agreement? :wacko:
[/quote]

I don't think it was his idea to put that in there, and lets face it most alliances he asked wouldn't protect him, so now that he has more members he has a better chance of being taken seriously with a larger alliance.

I agree with a statement made above though. Andover and Ishabad, you guys should consider merging, your idea's are very similar and both of you want a democracy, but regardless I wish you both well.

Edited by Muddog
Link to comment
Share on other sites

[quote name='Uralica' timestamp='1285820352' post='2469333']
Time to headdesk again.

USA, Why on earth did you put a membership count clause into your protectorate agreement? :wacko:
[/quote]

It was probably required to get the protectorate.

They'll still have some trouble getting a proper protectorate treaty since they don't even have a charter yet.

Agree with Muddog, merge already.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

[quote name='Andover' timestamp='1285619625' post='2466202']
[center]Treaty canceled at the request of USA's protector since protector gave no approval for it.[/center]
[/quote]

wait, so you announced it with out approval? :psyduck:

Link to comment
Share on other sites

[quote name='Andover' timestamp='1285619625' post='2466202']
[center]Treaty canceled at the request of USA's protector since protector gave no approval for it.[/center]
[/quote]
I must say, I chuckled a little. Competence just drips out of your every pore, doesn't it?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

×
×
  • Create New...