Who is taking the biggest beating in this war?

[Seron]

Interesting poll...there should be something like this for all the major wars.

[Prime minister Johns]

As I see it TOP will be toppled eventually.

CnG has the numbers on its side but TOP has superior individual resources, but eventually these resources will be depleted over time at a considerable cost to the alliances attacking TOP.

So my prediction is for a Pyrrhic victory to CnG.

[Yankees Empire]

TORN's been holding their own, but so far they've lost roughly 2/3 of their original strength.

[Wilhelm the Demented]

[quote name='Fulgrim' date='17 February 2010 - 06:59 AM' timestamp='1266407987' post='2187433']
I would add Sparta to that list.
[/quote]
We wear sandles anyway.


On a more serious note - We don't have bootlickers because we don't care for them. If they are grovelling at our feet, they aren't strong enough for our support, if they can stand beside us as equals, we will stand by them as friends.

I have to say IRON is getting the most apparent beating from where I'm standing, to stay on topic.

[Zoomzoomzoom]

Am I getting the impression from this topic that Sparta thinks they're [i]good[/i] at war?

Edited February 21, 2010 by Zoomzoomzoom

[Wilhelm the Demented]

[quote name='Zoomzoomzoom' date='21 February 2010 - 06:02 PM' timestamp='1266793364' post='2195572']
Am I getting the impression from this topic that Sparta thinks they're [i]good[/i] at war?
[/quote]
It's nice to see that horse is still dead.

[Fulgrim]

[quote name='Hyperion321' date='17 February 2010 - 09:39 PM' timestamp='1266442750' post='2188004']
If by not having bootlickers, you mean not treating allies like they should be licking our boots, then yes we have that in common with GGA. Having bootlickers is not a good thing, nor something you should be proud of.
[/quote]

No. I mean that no-one actually wants to lick your boots. They are not that... lickable.

[Prime minister Johns]

After seeing what Sparta just stood in I shall not lick their boots.

[Wilhelm the Demented]

[quote name='Fulgrim' date='22 February 2010 - 04:18 AM' timestamp='1266830317' post='2197022']
No. I mean that no-one actually wants to lick your boots. They are not that... lickable.
[/quote]Sandles.


[quote name='Prime minister Johns' date='22 February 2010 - 07:28 AM' timestamp='1266841695' post='2197122']
After seeing what Sparta just stood in I shall not lick their boots.
[/quote]Sandles!

LISTEN TO WHAT I AM SAYING!

[TimeMaster]

[quote name='Prime minister Johns' date='21 February 2010 - 02:41 PM' timestamp='1266763261' post='2194999']
As I see it TOP will be toppled eventually.

CnG has the numbers on its side but TOP has superior individual resources, but eventually these resources will be depleted over time at a considerable cost to the alliances attacking TOP.

So my prediction is for a Pyrrhic victory to CnG.
[/quote]

Except. . .CnG losses will, in general, be cheaper to replace. TOP had way more nations in the 100k+ range, some of which have lost nearly half their NS. Those kinds of losses are HUGE at that level. . .if TOP doesn't burn the remainder of their warchests post-war for rebuilding (assuming they have any warchests at the time), it'll take them a good while to rebuild to their former strength. CnG in general, however, probably won't take so long. So, you could say that TOP has taken a huge beating, more so than IRON, when you factor in costs of lost infra + tech, along with lost land, exhausted warchests, etc.