Subtleknifewielder Posted August 14, 2009 Report Share Posted August 14, 2009 "What need is there for the international court to try them if they are already being tried in a fair manner by an individual nation?" Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
DeSchaine Posted August 14, 2009 Report Share Posted August 14, 2009 Ah, but there was no nation attempting to place Matens on trial. Hence, an international group is needed. Seeing as how Taeunas really never had any dealings with Martens, we would be willing to send a member of our Supreme Court to assist in the matter at hand. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Imperator Azenquor Posted August 14, 2009 Report Share Posted August 14, 2009 "What need is there for the international court to try them if they are already being tried in a fair manner by an individual nation?" "I am afraid that you have again missed the point that I am trying to make. We are expressing our surprise that the International Court of Justice, that now is claiming to pursue justice in the case against Kaiser Martens, has not previously sought to try any other person or government that may have committed similar crimes to the ones that Kaiser Martens is accused of. Kaiser Martens is by no means the first person to be accused of war crimes. It has been acknowledged by the representative from Procinctia that this is the first time that any trial is to occur before the International Court of Justice. We are simply pointing out that there are several other cases in which such crimes may have been committed, none of which were brought before the International Court of Justice, and none of which the International Court of Justice expressed a desire to see justice done in. In the cases of Aotearoa and the former DKT, we now realize that justice was served in these two cases by a Tribunal in the Tahoe Republic. While we acknowledge that DKT possibly was not the best example, we did state other examples, namely the former governments of Wiedergeburt and the Vaule Democratic Republic. We ask you to look at this matter from our perspective. We see crimes committed all over the world, none of which the ICJ gets involved with bringing those to justice. Then we see the case of Kaiser Martens that is the first such case brought before the ICJ." Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Uberstein Posted August 14, 2009 Report Share Posted August 14, 2009 "Well it has to start SOMEWHERE doesn't it? I am beginning to suspect that Vaule is just another nation following Nordic Socialism." -PM Vilho Gustafsson. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Imperator Azenquor Posted August 14, 2009 Report Share Posted August 14, 2009 "Well it has to start SOMEWHERE doesn't it? I am beginning to suspect that Vaule is just another nation following Nordic Socialism." -PM Vilho Gustafsson. "What is this Vaule you speak of? The Vaule Socialist Republic was the last state to bear that name and it ceased to exist more than a year ago" Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Uberstein Posted August 14, 2009 Report Share Posted August 14, 2009 "What is this Vaule you speak of? The Vaule Socialist Republic was the last state to bear that name and it ceased to exist more than a year ago" ooc: Wait, what is your current nation name? I just copied from your sig. <__< Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Generalissimo Posted August 14, 2009 Author Report Share Posted August 14, 2009 (edited) "I am afraid that you have again missed the point that I am trying to make. We are expressing our surprise that the International Court of Justice, that now is claiming to pursue justice in the case against Kaiser Martens, has not previously sought to try any other person or government that may have committed similar crimes to the ones that Kaiser Martens is accused of. Kaiser Martens is by no means the first person to be accused of war crimes.It has been acknowledged by the representative from Procinctia that this is the first time that any trial is to occur before the International Court of Justice. We are simply pointing out that there are several other cases in which such crimes may have been committed, none of which were brought before the International Court of Justice, and none of which the International Court of Justice expressed a desire to see justice done in. In the cases of Aotearoa and the former DKT, we now realize that justice was served in these two cases by a Tribunal in the Tahoe Republic. While we acknowledge that DKT possibly was not the best example, we did state other examples, namely the former governments of Wiedergeburt and the Vaule Democratic Republic. We ask you to look at this matter from our perspective. We see crimes committed all over the world, none of which the ICJ gets involved with bringing those to justice. Then we see the case of Kaiser Martens that is the first such case brought before the ICJ." The International Court of Justice was not active at the time of the aforementioned incidents; but Tahoe’s past handling of tribunals for war criminals was inspirational – I would be delighted if we had a third of Tahoe’s success.Building a multinational association isn’t as easy as signing a document, until today the International Court of Justice only existed on paper. It’s taken months of boring subcommittees and redundant meetings to organize the International Court of Justice into a viable international body (months of meetings & subcommittees Generalissimo had to stay both awake and sober for), we weren’t ready for an international trial until today. With prior consultation involving three other countries Procinctia immediately invoked our right to call a trail for Kaiser Martens on first day of ICJ operation because there isn’t a greater criminal alive, something I hope to prove beyond a doubt at the trial. Edited August 14, 2009 by Generalissimo Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
iamthey Posted August 14, 2009 Report Share Posted August 14, 2009 Kaiser Martens and his family is offered sanctuary in the Tahoe Republic should he find Europe to dangerous of a place to continue living We offer the same. We do not recognize the world congress's international court as well. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
loannes Posted August 14, 2009 Report Share Posted August 14, 2009 We offer the same. We do not recognize the world congress's international court as well. We third (or fourth) this statement. Drakoria does not recognize any international law making body. Kaiser Martens may find sanctuary in Drakoria if he wishes. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
JEDCJT Posted August 14, 2009 Report Share Posted August 14, 2009 We third (or fourth) this statement. Drakoria does not recognize any international law making body. Kaiser Martens may find sanctuary in Drakoria if he wishes. We fourth (or fifth) this statement. New England does not recognize any international law making body. Kaiser Martens may find sanctuary in New England if he wishes. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Justinian the Mighty Posted August 14, 2009 Report Share Posted August 14, 2009 We infinityith and infinityith plus one it. Kaiser Martens is welcome in Slavorussia... in a labor camp, or hanging from the gallows. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Tahsir Posted August 14, 2009 Report Share Posted August 14, 2009 (edited) The International Court of Justice was not active at the time of the aforementioned incidents; but Tahoe’s past handling of tribunals for war criminals was inspirational – I would be delighted if we had a third of Tahoe’s success. Only one out of three major opposing government suspects dying? The republic at this time would like to state that we do NOT offer asylum to Kaiser Martens. As Nordheim has not made any motion to extradited him I see no reason why any nation would be offering safe haven to someone that apparently doesn't need it. Edited August 14, 2009 by Tahsir Re Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Comrade Posted August 14, 2009 Report Share Posted August 14, 2009 Molakia enjoys how the worlds previous dictators were executed or historically destroyed, but Martens continues to have supported. The fact Tahoe supports him is rather sad. I guess Facism and Destruction are vogue now. Molakia will hunt, BY ANY MEANS NECESSARY, and kill/arrest Martens, reguardless of where he resides. He has caused too much pain to Mother Europe. All of you that support him should be given a stern talking too. Would you harbor Pol Pot? How about Duvalier? I didnt think so. What about Martens speaks to you? The power of his goverments over the people? The Imperialism his goverments showed? His Blatent disreguard for human life? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Subtleknifewielder Posted August 14, 2009 Report Share Posted August 14, 2009 "I am afraid that you have again missed the point that I am trying to make. We are expressing our surprise that the International Court of Justice, that now is claiming to pursue justice in the case against Kaiser Martens, has not previously sought to try any other person or government that may have committed similar crimes to the ones that Kaiser Martens is accused of. Kaiser Martens is by no means the first person to be accused of war crimes.It has been acknowledged by the representative from Procinctia that this is the first time that any trial is to occur before the International Court of Justice. We are simply pointing out that there are several other cases in which such crimes may have been committed, none of which were brought before the International Court of Justice, and none of which the International Court of Justice expressed a desire to see justice done in. In the cases of Aotearoa and the former DKT, we now realize that justice was served in these two cases by a Tribunal in the Tahoe Republic. While we acknowledge that DKT possibly was not the best example, we did state other examples, namely the former governments of Wiedergeburt and the Vaule Democratic Republic. We ask you to look at this matter from our perspective. We see crimes committed all over the world, none of which the ICJ gets involved with bringing those to justice. Then we see the case of Kaiser Martens that is the first such case brought before the ICJ." Wiedergeburt was before the existence of the World Court. The Vaule Democratic Republic? Charge someone with a specific crime, someone clearly in the wrong, and we might consider it. Kaiser Martens is not a scapegoat, like you seem to think--he has committed crimes not only internally, against his own 'people,' but he has comitted crimes against other sovereign nations. That anyone would support him after his attacks on sovereign nations is disgusting. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.