Jump to content

Citadel declares on the Warriors


Recommended Posts

Citadel declares on  The Warriors

 

That’s my DoW. I’m not Halushki and I can’t entertain you.

 

The rest of this DoW is my personal statement.

 

………………………………………………………………………………

 

The current Warriors are experienced and skilled players. For their first war they have chosen Citadel, which has heaps of newbies playing only the second round here. They called it “Nukes vs Money”. Most of our members had no money and no nukes.

So, basically it was an easy XP-stroll. Instead of choosing to fight a competent alliance with skills, money and more nukes – they have chosen that way.

 

After that, they had the nerve to complain that it was “boring and depressing”.

Of course it was. What did you expect?

 

We have one silly 14 years old kid who sent  offensive messages to you. I was considering to punish him and apologize when threats and insults came in droves – from the government members.

Apparently, the stupid pms from a kid are equal to the offensive pms from the Warriors gov., who are allegedly mature “father-figures”.

Here comes an after – peace nuke by one of our members as well – an honest mistake.

They didn’t believe me, so there was no point of continuing to waste time with those people.

 

What’s more in the Warriors’s gov. mind  both of Citadel members were carrying  out Citadel’s government’s assignment.. That’s what was coming from pms of the Warriors’ MoD – WarHammer. The most offensive person I’ve ever met in the government. Personal/Alliance Insults and threats to wipe us out.  He was not the only one to do that though.

 

If I’d wanted to offend the warriors, I would’ve posted OWF “ @#$%^&*() yourself “ instead of sending kids.

Both pms from this kid (I always have one difficult person in Citadel, trying to straighten him up :/) and the after-peace nuke were our fault, of course.

The manner in which the Warriors government proceeded  - that what was deplorable.

All that after being in Citadel and switching sides later on. Well, it’s not the first time.

 

 

Doesn’t matter what I would be telling them, they wouldn’t believe it.

……………………………………………………………………………..

Well, I  haven’t experienced such bullying in all my TE life and it’s no secret I don’t like the Warrios very much . Funny to say, that when we’ve started the round, I even sent a recruit to you as our friends.

 

Suffice to say, that most Citadel members still don’t have money as in the first war.

According to the multiple descriptions of “friends of mine”, our members are low skilled including their Leader.

Well, it makes it easy for you then and leaves a question again why an elite AA would attack such low-skilled AA pretending it was an equal fight – even statistically it wasn’t.

Even now TWarriors have the upper hand in the high tier.

 

My stupid ethics didn’t let me to attack you whilest you were at war  and were still in after-nukes state of economy. Recalling that “The Warriors” attacked us a few days after our war in the past, I have no problems doing the same now. You are legally responsible for whatever AA you are wearing has done in the past, are you not?

 

I’m pretty sure the Warriors can “win” this war and destroy quite a few nations. Our attack is no surprise for the Warriors. They know I always hit back, so this war was expected and pre-determined.

I say -good practice for our noobs.

…………………………………

I’m saying this is in my  last round and therefore the last war as a Citadel permanent leader.

 

I consider “The Warriors” the biggest all-time threat for Citadel and I’ll keep in touch with new Citadel leaders and will be ready to come back and defend my brothers if the need arises. In whatever capacity they would want me – inside or outside of Citadel.

 

I must say, that decision to start this war wasn’t  supported by all in Citadel government, but that’s where the perks of being a decision-maker kick in.

 

Galatians 6:7-8
Be not deceived; God is not mocked: for whatever a man sows, that shall he also reap.

 

Let’s get over with this. The round end is nigh. Looking forward to this more balanced war – we have nukes now too. I hope it won’t be as depressing as the first one.

 

Flies fly, the trolls troll and kong92 kongs.

 

THE END

 

PS. I have problems to log online. A big stuff up for me today. That's life. Must be weather.

 

 

 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Replies 56
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Yeah, after the change of gov in tW we thought we could move on and mind our own bussiness, specially after TBRaiders and his group joined tW this round. 

 

Alas, they decided to get the ball spinning again, and tW hit Citadel. While we disliked the idea of fighting against people we considered friends, we believe that hitting an alliance that has been hitting us once and again for the last few rounds is necessary, cause it seems tW think that Citadel only likes to complain and never hits back.

Edited by Dark Zone Elite
Link to comment
Share on other sites

At the time I'm pretty sure if the Warriors had DoW anyone else it'd have been a massive down declare. I believe Citadel was the obvious choice and you can't blame the Warriors for your lack of money, nukes or use this "we're a newbie alliance and the Warriors are elite" excuse. Citadel are far from a newbie alliance and most if not all AA's have newbies.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I'm going to say what I said in the OP thread. The only way is for one side to be wiped from TE. Only a river of blood will cleanse TE at this point.

 

Also, preempted. 

 

http://forums.cybernations.net/index.php?/topic/120985-tpc-announcement/

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I'm going to say what I said in the OP thread. The only way is for one side to be wiped from TE. Only a river of blood will cleanse TE at this point.

 

Also, preempted. 

 

http://forums.cybernations.net/index.php?/topic/120985-tpc-announcement/

They can only wipe pixels and deserters and those can be rebuilt/discarded.

 

 

 

Also, how many days of peace did the Warriors get? 5 days? I don't think leaving your TE with this act is a good note to leave on. Creating more dislike/tension and not being around if they come looking for pay back.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

They can only wipe pixels and deserters and those can be rebuilt/discarded.

 

 

 

Also, how many days of peace did the Warriors get? 5 days? I don't think leaving your TE with this act is a good note to leave on. Creating more dislike/tension and not being around if they come looking for pay back.

 

You can break a person's will to play...or at the very least screw with you. Most aren't really in the business of doing that or we'd have a whole lot less of the current nonsense overwhelming TE. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

While it is true that we did see this coming, I am surprised that you would do this when we are mere days from our last battle. No matter. We shall give you your war. Come taste our blades still wet from the blood of OP, WD and NPLTrain.

 

Romans 12:17

Do not repay anyone evil for evil. Be careful to do what is right in the eyes of everyone.

Edited by trs4ece
Link to comment
Share on other sites

 

You can break a person's will to play...or at the very least screw with you. Most aren't really in the business of doing that or we'd have a whole lot less of the current nonsense overwhelming TE. 

The veterans should lead by example and try to make the game as fair and fun as possible but they're the ones doing the opposite, further diminishing TE membership.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

At the time I'm pretty sure if the Warriors had DoW anyone else it'd have been a massive down declare. I believe Citadel was the obvious choice and you can't blame the Warriors for your lack of money, nukes or use this "we're a newbie alliance and the Warriors are elite" excuse. Citadel are far from a newbie alliance and most if not all AA's have newbies.

 

The irony in this one is great. So its perfect when Warriors downdeclares a ton, but when Hellas/RB/WDs hits Skaro/Misfits and rolled you guys when you had some advantages its horrible? Might I say that I'm 100% sure that you used the argument in that thread that "Skaro isn't very good, everyone knows it" and the pure lack of money both AAs had. 

 

The veterans should lead by example and try to make the game as fair and fun as possible but they're the ones doing the opposite, further diminishing TE membership.

 

Your posting will drive more from the game than the leaders. 

 

 

Btw, I like this war. Have fun Kong and DZE. o/

Link to comment
Share on other sites

 

The irony in this one is great. So its perfect when Warriors downdeclares a ton, but when Hellas/RB/WDs hits Skaro/Misfits and rolled you guys when you had some advantages its horrible? Might I say that I'm 100% sure that you used the argument in that thread that "Skaro isn't very good, everyone knows it" and the pure lack of money both AAs had. 

 

 

Your posting will drive more from the game than the leaders. 

 

 

Btw, I like this war. Have fun Kong and DZE. o/

I was waiting for one of you to try and derail the topic. Stick to the topic at hand or get out.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

The irony in this one is great. So its perfect when Warriors downdeclares a ton, but when Hellas/RB/WDs hits Skaro/Misfits and rolled you guys when you had some advantages its horrible? Might I say that I'm 100% sure that you used the argument in that thread that "Skaro isn't very good, everyone knows it" and the pure lack of money both AAs had.   Your posting will drive more from the game than the leaders.   Btw, I like this war. Have fun Kong and DZE. o/


Looking back through history, few alliances down declare like yours
Many of the bigger down declares involved you and yours

Look at what you said there about "Hellas/RB/WDs hits Skaro/Misfits"
That is a huge down declare, even worse than this one
Skaro appears to be the second worst building alliance in the game
Nlon might be worse but not by much, but thats something else

Your war was all about punishing misfits
No wonder they felt the need to get in some cheap shots back
Just like we did with those wd jerks

Whether you have the sack to admit it or not
Your war was pathetic
Link to comment
Share on other sites

I was waiting for one of you to try and derail the topic. Stick to the topic at hand or get out.

 

No, you weren't waiting for it. You don't have the intelligence or foresight to, and the relevance of the point brought up has already been shown. The point is you're being hypocritical.

 

You just chose not to answer his point because you couldn't. You probably still won't even with this amount of stalling.

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

 

No, you weren't waiting for it. You don't have the intelligence or foresight to, and the relevance of the point brought up has already been shown. The point is you're being hypocritical.

 

You just chose not to answer his point because you couldn't. You probably still won't even with this amount of stalling.

 

I was waiting actually as is the norm of TE forums to derail threads. Also Ive answered his points before in the appropriate threads and will not allow him/them to further hijack these threads by consistently coming after me.

 

 

Looking back through history, few alliances down declare like yours
Many of the bigger down declares involved you and yours

Look at what you said there about "Hellas/RB/WDs hits Skaro/Misfits"
That is a huge down declare, even worse than this one
Skaro appears to be the second worst building alliance in the game
Nlon might be worse but not by much, but thats something else

Your war was all about punishing misfits
No wonder they felt the need to get in some cheap shots back
Just like we did with those wd jerks

Whether you have the sack to admit it or not
Your war was pathetic

The points were answered here if your interested.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I am sorry to interupt this friendly exchange of kind words, but I think if you look at the thread topic it says "Citadel declares on Warriors" , so unless you are directly affected by the war please avoid flaming and trolling.

 

Daenerys Targaryen, dude/girl can stop this already? You are hijacking kongs magnificent thread.

 

And this is the real reason for war:

 

[09:21:48] <~DarkZoneElite[NPL]> lol, that will be easy, I will toss predrag

[09:22:03] <~DarkZoneElite[NPL]> if he lands face up, war with tW

[09:22:15] <~DarkZoneElite[NPL]> if he lands face down...

 

 

 

Sorry tW I landed face up :/

Link to comment
Share on other sites

All this time and this is what you got.

 

 

I was waiting actually as is the norm of TE forums to derail threads. Also Ive answered his points before in the appropriate threads and will not allow him/them to further hijack these threads by consistently coming after me.

 

 

The points were answered here if your interested.

 

You say you have a point but you can't list it. You just have it somewhere and can't show it. Next you say you weren't expecting his post in particular.. but a derailment. Soon I'm sure what you meant to say was you were expecting posts in a thread.

 

Now you're going to Captain Prose here to try to justify what you're saying. I remember the war. The numbers were close at the start. There wasn't a down declare. But, I guess we're just going to throw that word around here.

 

But let's pretend it's a downdeclare. If you had a brain you would know that is what Skaros precisely did last round - attacked alliances that were already weakened from war. And that's how that little coalition formed against them this round. What do you expect?

 

And on top of that, this has literally nothing to do with you being hypocritical. You're stalling. Again. The premise of his post was the other guy was being hypocritical, and that is somehow a defense of your hypocrisy.

 

 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

All this time and this is what you got.

 

 

 

You say you have a point but you can't list it. You just have it somewhere and can't show it. Next you say you weren't expecting his post in particular.. but a derailment. Soon I'm sure what you meant to say was you were expecting posts in a thread.

 

Now you're going to Captain Prose here to try to justify what you're saying. I remember the war. The numbers were close at the start. There wasn't a down declare. But, I guess we're just going to throw that word around here.

 

But let's pretend it's a downdeclare. If you had a brain you would know that is what Skaros precisely did last round - attacked alliances that were already weakened from war. And that's how that little coalition formed against them this round. What do you expect?

 

And on top of that, this has literally nothing to do with you being hypocritical. You're stalling. Again. The premise of his post was the other guy was being hypocritical, and that is somehow a defense of your hypocrisy.

 

 

 

Go and tell someone who cares and quit trying to derail the thread further. None of that matters here.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Go and tell someone who cares and quit trying to derail the thread further. None of that matters here.

I am telling someone who cares. I am telling you. And you don't even recognize the second hypocrisy of quoting Acid's post as your defense when he's talking about another war. If you want to stop the thread from being derailed, quit doing it yourself.

 

We're happy to stay on topic. Quit making the thread about you then. But if you're intent to shitpost off the walls and bounce off the ceiling, I'm going to address it.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I am sorry to interupt this friendly exchange of kind words, but I think if you look at the thread topic it says "Citadel declares on Warriors" , so unless you are directly affected by the war please avoid flaming and trolling.

 

Daenerys Targaryen, dude/girl can stop this already? You are hijacking kongs magnificent thread.

 

And this is the real reason for war:

 

[09:21:48] <~DarkZoneElite[NPL]> lol, that will be easy, I will toss predrag

[09:22:03] <~DarkZoneElite[NPL]> if he lands face up, war with tW

[09:22:15] <~DarkZoneElite[NPL]> if he lands face down...

 

 

 

Sorry tW I landed face up :/

You must be confused. I'm not the one who is derailing the thread, in fact I'm trying to stop it before it escalates but your welcome.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

You must be confused. I'm not the one who is derailing the thread, in fact I'm trying to stop it before it escalates but your welcome.

You didn't defend how you're not being hypocritical. You dodged.

 

You didn't defend how you're not derailing the thread. You dodged.

 

But please, keep posting. This problem will just go away because you think you can get the last word.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I am telling someone who cares. I am telling you. And you don't even recognize the second hypocrisy of quoting Acid's post as your defense when he's talking about another war. If you want to stop the thread from being derailed, quit doing it yourself.

 

We're happy to stay on topic. Quit making the thread about you then. But if you're intent to !@#$post off the walls and bounce off the ceiling, I'm going to address it.

Acid was addressing the war bombuato and you seem to be up set about. I'm not sure we've I've tried to make the thread about me but your welcome to address my post as is everyone else, just stay on topic.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

You didn't defend how you're not being hypocritical. You dodged.

 

You didn't defend how you're not derailing the thread. You dodged.

 

But please, keep posting. This problem will just go away because you think you can get the last word.

Can you provide proof to these claims you're making?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Acid was addressing the war bombuato and you seem to be up set about. I'm not sure we've I've tried to make the thread about me but your welcome to address my post as is everyone else, just stay on topic.

There you go again.

 

Neither of us are upset about it. Justify how we are. I'm going to bet like everything else here you won't.

 

You brought up downdeclaring. You were shown as hypocritical. You got called out on it. You used Acid's post talking about another war as your defense when you're considering other wars a derailment. You're being hypocritical twice.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share


×
×
  • Create New...