Pax Animi

Clarifying: can be just one $30 May or June donation offered.

Looking for $30 May and June donations. Message me in-game if interested with prices/terms.

Seller backed out. Willing to go up on the price considering there's only a few hours left for the month. Pm me in-game if interested. If not, I can buy it myself this month or something.

Buying donation for 18m/300t for April. Message me in-game if interested EDIT: http://www.cybernations.net/nation_drill_display.asp?Nation_ID=543140

1 slot open, op updated

1 Slot available

Updated, 2 more slots will open in this week.

http://www.cybernations.net/nation_drill_display.asp?Nation_ID=543140 Let me know if interested. nmphuong91 - 100 left 100 sent ductiger1234 - 100 left 100 sent Southern Russia - 200 Lolman- 200 CLOSED - open 23rd CLOSED - Donation dealing slot

Logging in nation While caressing my crotch I pay bills today.

Alex, if you had one shot, one opportunity, to seize everything you ever wanted, would you capture or let it slip?

This seems kind of ignorant of the first war and the number of threats and harassment we received from them during and after.

There you go again. You have 4 claims in here without any support. Bomb brought up Downdeclaring in Skaros. You were in Skaros. Try to keep up. If by responding to you makes us upset, then you're twice as upset because you're literally doubleposting. Once again, quit making this thread about yourself and stop spamming. You literally turn every topic you post in from CNTE to CNSE a whining thread about you. I wanted you to justify any of your positions with answers. I've covered this several times. But when called on them, you just jump to another. You say you've already covered Bomb's point in other threads. But you can't say it here. Strange. Evidently us being upset is your argument now. Acid's post for Bomb was calling him hypocritical. I explained how he wasn't and how his case (and Acid's post) isn't a defense of yours. In your eyes, if someone else is a hypocrite, then you must not be a hypocrite. Again, your logic doesn't make any sense. But sure, that answer was staring me in the face. Or your lack of one. You don't want derailing, but you continuously derail the thread. Pick one. I would be happy to. The difference in NS for this war pre-update attack was around 10-20k NS. That gap is widening after this update. Citadel was hamstrung early. Warriors was hamstrung later. We both ended up at about the same NS. They have less nukes than us, which gives us an advantage in that area. It's the opposite situation of last war, where we had far less nukes (not many because we were experimenting with coal in the first weeks instead of uranium for growth). They also have a better ratio than we did then. They have some advantages in WRC count, HNMS, and other things. We expect a tough fight in the upper tiers. The first war we'd hope to avoid any grudges after they got us with our pants down and rolled us good. But there were several instances that happened afterward and during that... strained relations. One member sent some snarky letter and then the Warriors sent a lot of insults and threats after that. On the last days of the war, there was also some blows exchanged between sides. One involved a nuke from a Citadel nation to a Warriors one, and they were threatening to roll us again for it. There have been several other taunts as Kong brought up. I'm still not nursing a grudge, but that's why we're here today. Our positions are reversed from last time, except with the Warriors having quite a better position than we did (WRCs, other mil wonders, nukes). Still, when you're throwing the word downdeclare out, you can only justify it by nuke count and ignoring everything else. I've only heard that being used in regards to NS though. Our nations even now are still at similar levels looking at the nation rankings. So I don't think it's particular fair to call this downdeclaring, especially when we went out of our way to make our wars fair like last round (where we hit 3 alliances at once).

There you go again. Neither of us are upset about it. Justify how we are. I'm going to bet like everything else here you won't. You brought up downdeclaring. You were shown as hypocritical. You got called out on it. You used Acid's post talking about another war as your defense when you're considering other wars a derailment. You're being hypocritical twice.

You didn't defend how you're not being hypocritical. You dodged. You didn't defend how you're not derailing the thread. You dodged. But please, keep posting. This problem will just go away because you think you can get the last word.

I am telling someone who cares. I am telling you. And you don't even recognize the second hypocrisy of quoting Acid's post as your defense when he's talking about another war. If you want to stop the thread from being derailed, quit doing it yourself. We're happy to stay on topic. Quit making the thread about you then. But if you're intent to shitpost off the walls and bounce off the ceiling, I'm going to address it.

All this time and this is what you got. You say you have a point but you can't list it. You just have it somewhere and can't show it. Next you say you weren't expecting his post in particular.. but a derailment. Soon I'm sure what you meant to say was you were expecting posts in a thread. Now you're going to Captain Prose here to try to justify what you're saying. I remember the war. The numbers were close at the start. There wasn't a down declare. But, I guess we're just going to throw that word around here. But let's pretend it's a downdeclare. If you had a brain you would know that is what Skaros precisely did last round - attacked alliances that were already weakened from war. And that's how that little coalition formed against them this round. What do you expect? And on top of that, this has literally nothing to do with you being hypocritical. You're stalling. Again. The premise of his post was the other guy was being hypocritical, and that is somehow a defense of your hypocrisy.

No, you weren't waiting for it. You don't have the intelligence or foresight to, and the relevance of the point brought up has already been shown. The point is you're being hypocritical. You just chose not to answer his point because you couldn't. You probably still won't even with this amount of stalling.

Who would've thought going coal first would've brought such long-lasting consequences!

Can name change requests be applied to other people's nations? I've searched the forums for an answer on it but not go. I did gather there was a form that has to be filled out after donating to change the name (alternatively replying to admin's email).

You have yet to give any facts. Save your shitposting for the water cooler.

So you're one of those alliances that "wrings their hands?" A 20-member alliance now below 500k NS just out of war is what you can handle? The terms you presented call for UCR to renounce their views of communism and call them stupid. Would you accept terms that call for you to reject the right to bear arms or suck NPO's dick? Would you even compromise if you were hit for no reason? Let's consider a hypothetical situation where FAN is attacked on a trumped up CB shall we?

Eroding sympathy by dissing an entire nation in an IC forum isn't the most productive use of time for you or your allies.

FAN members were responding to people asking about why UCR was hit with they don't care. No one asked them about their activity and what rules they played by. Saying you actually do care because you care about something not even the topic of conversation is irrelevant and stupid. I can't miss a point you don't have.

You guys are literally only posting "we don't care/you don't know FAN/I know the CB do you/we don't need a CB." So yea, we get it.

The first 7 pages were all praise for FAN. Now FAN members through their posting have ruined it. :U