oinkoink12
-
Posts
563 -
Joined
-
Last visited
Content Type
Profiles
Forums
Blogs
Gallery
Posts posted by oinkoink12
-
-
What is your favorite kind of bacon?
I do not like this question
<_< -
You mean, in December 2007?
Still I have no real idea who the OP is.
Me neither but he seems to destroy your precious infra
-
The problem with your analogy is that it gives the impression that the TPF won the pot.
When, in fact, Athens and Co. have been smacking TPF for a week and now get to leave home unscratched.
You sometimes lose a pot, but win the game.
And thats what happend.
-
Great idea, seen that before though
-
Fully agree.
-
nad bud becessary
-
Now this makes sense, if you are allied to FOK you have to be sure that ALL of their treaty partners are on board to get support. come on Avenger.
What he means is that One group of ally's can't demand from FOK that they abandon the other group of ally's.
-
Your allies are on multiple sides.
Look, guys, I understand what you're trying to do here, I really do. And this whole announcement sounds great, and it sounds staunch and principled, but completely unpractical. You get the pleasure of everyone saying "noble stance!" and "that's how you stand by your allies", but in reality, to your allies this is completely unhelpful, and they're left wondering what they have to do to actually win your treaty-level support when the blows start flying, and further, wondering if you're going to be a liability by fighting with them while simultaneously undermining their efforts and helping the opposing side. I realize that you guys are in a difficult position; I'm just trying to call this a little more like it is.
If one of my allies made a public decision like this, I would be totally sketched out.
First of all, we have an MDoaP with someone, not with their "Coalition".
If one of my allies would ask if I want to help them kill 4 of my other allies on the other side. How can you actually think we would help kill 4 of our treatypartners.
If one of our treatypartners on the agressive side thinks its not cool? They should have thought of that before they wanted to kill 35% of our treatypartners.
-
Isn't this a hypocrisy? On one side you are saying you will attack your allie's attackers no matter who they are, but on the other side if your ally attacks your ally it's cool with you?
Not really, first of all we urge our allies to not attack each other. Second of all we will be LIKELY to stay neutral cause choosing between allies is not cool. If we have to pick a side than we prolly wont pick the agressors side. Cause they choose to attack one of our ally's the defenders dont.
-
I am interested in your interpretation of 'defence'. In short, will you be chaining your treaties (for example let's say the Guru Order – picked as the least likely to cause trouble
– attacks someone and their MDP partners respond, will you 'defend' them)? If not, which would be my interpretation of 'defence', then this policy is much less likely to cause you grief, as most entries to the war (if they happen) are likely to be aggressive.First of all, we will handle everything case by case. On your example my first answer would be No. GO knows if they gonna attack lets say MHA, that Gramlins will be likely to defend them.
Thats why we made our policy clear to everybody before they act. So they can re-evaluate their decisions.
-
Well so much for LEO Unity, lol.
LEO can allways help us
-
Then again, there aren't three sides in the war.
Heh This is correct.
-
Thinking about that ABC situation.
I think we would use a Triple Break Flank Attack to cover all area's
-
Not what I asked
Not FOK's allies, but your ally's allies.
A attacks B, you attack A, C has treaty with you and A. That puts C in a difficult position, one which I wouldn't want on any of my allies.
We'd rather not attack our ally's ally's.
But its unlikely that we are treaty'd to A, B and C.
-
Cool... so what happens if you attack an ally's ally?
the ally of your ally is your enemy's friend right?
Or was it something else
-
Dear citizens of Planet Bob,
Apparently a big war is on the horizon. A war that divides the treaty cluster this beautiful planet has carefully built up. We at FOK are aware that this division will unfortunately separate some of our allies from each other which brings FOK in a difficult position. We stand by our allies. We are not part of the on-going war nor do we support one of the sides. However, we will support our allies since they are always on our side. In case someone attacks one of our MDP (or higher) partners we declare war on them regardless of so called sides someone is on. In case an ally declares on an ally we will be likely to remain neutral in that instance.
Lesson to all: Don't attack an ally of FOK because we will always defend them. Whether the world is at peace, at war or in between: We defend our allies.
- FOK Government
-
So whats the summary of the last 20 pages?
Also my sig is killing me
-
10th jan. Got a slot open
Nation link:Ginryu
this is not a techdeal topic noob
-
FINALLY, I CAN USE IT!!!!
You have sown the wind. You shall reap the whirlwind.TPF IS GOING DOWN!!!
tl;dr This all shows Karma's true idea's and values.
The NEW WORLD my $@!.
I'm glad I can use terms as "noCB war" and "Coalition of Cowards" to show you how I feel about this utter failure 6 month to late half assed CB.
Regards
Piggy
-
i do 5x 3m50 tech. so that saves you 3m50 tech
-
December or jan, your choice. Only got 2
-
What is this I don't even?
Look, it's a small corner, I'm not even sure how Invicta and ODN ended up in it, there's not really enough cake to go around, we just shipped all our Twinkies to STA, the booze is only just holding up. We're a hospitable bunch, but I don't think we can fit all of NSO in here. On the plus side, given how compressed we would all be, Heft might get some of that leg-humping action he's so interested in. So - OK, in the spirit of the season, they can join the party.
I was just making a random comment like everybody did in the last 28 pages
:lol1: -
/me puts NSO in a corner with alliances like Invicta and ODN
-
This is almost impossible, i would love admin to look in to this.
<_< 
– attacks someone and their MDP partners respond, will you 'defend' them)? If not, which would be my interpretation of 'defence', then this policy is much less likely to cause you grief, as most entries to the war (if they happen) are likely to be aggressive.
Revenge of the Smurfs
in Alliance Announcements (IC)
Posted · Edited by oinkoink12
Locke
Dont you ever stop?