Endurance

[quote name='Overlord Wes' timestamp='1326162445' post='2896639'] Would you please remind me what this has to do with the peace talks? [/quote] Why it has everything to do with it! THINK OF THE CHILDREN!!! It is a very bad example. I agree. http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=aTcvE5ptk6Q

[quote name='Overlord Wes' timestamp='1326159954' post='2896618'] That's actually in the rules, good sir. Also, I've never had a problem with my nation name in the year+ I've been playing TE. Including when I was fighting a moderator. [/quote] Well you need to read the rule again. You are messed up. What's your full title? "Overlord Wes of the Negroes"?

[quote name='Overlord Wes' timestamp='1326154917' post='2896562'] Don't like getting declared on? Declare on someone else first. Also, what alliance are you in? You don't seem to have that info listed. [/quote] Don't be lazy, log in and check. edit: WHAT THE? Your nation's name is "Negroes"? and that passed the filter? And your ruler's name is "Overlord Wes"? There is something seriously wrong here.

[quote name='Holy Empire of Halin' timestamp='1326155435' post='2896569'] You have a bigger and wilder imagination then the OP. [/quote] All you need is a dollar and a dream. edit: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=itLxVsu9q2M http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Sp1vmSY4BbA&feature=related

edit: nvm I found it and good luck with RL.

[quote name='potato' timestamp='1326155086' post='2896565'] Only two of those you quoted are in DH alliances. And none of them are gov't. [/quote] My bad, let's see where this will lead.

[quote name='Presidant Joe' timestamp='1326150373' post='2896507'] You do realize that no one will help you right? espically if you don't want to pay. You messed up and know you have to suffer the consciences of your actions [/quote] [quote name='Sniper Joe' timestamp='1326150550' post='2896509'] I support this endeavor [/quote] [quote name='Holy Empire of Halin' timestamp='1326151067' post='2896512'] If he wants our services he has to pay up, the days giving things out for free are over. Eric, you have to offer us something [/quote] [quote name='steodonn' timestamp='1326153880' post='2896546'] The Terran Empire driving people out of the game. Surely they are the new hegemony [/quote] [quote name='Anatolian' timestamp='1326153943' post='2896548'] P.S. Most of these are views of myself alone and may not be expressed by the Alliance. [/quote] DH is looking for a CB and Anatolian only just realized it. Where's my popcorn? Oh! there it's

[quote name='jraenar' timestamp='1326128244' post='2896342'] Nope, APC wants to continue burning. Everyone else can get white peace, I'm sure. [/quote] I want to see things with your point of view but I just can't get my head that far up my ass. Dude, you guys went Pearl Harbor on all of us, and now you just go ahead and wanted to decide peace just like that? You put us all on the same front thinking you could take us all down. Now deal with us as a single alliance bloc like you did when you declared war. Don't try to single out APC. You think the rest out us would just leave APC behind or something? The popular sentiment right now is that we burn you ass. Please show a little civility and respect. We are not a scumbag alliance who would abandon our allies who just fought with us and sought peace by ourselves and don't think the others would accept your term neither.

[quote name='King Ernie' timestamp='1326089137' post='2896179'] Madness!? THIS IS SPARTAAA. [size="1"]I had to..[/size] [/quote] This is the 3 amigos: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=dDDGIW_sXvc

Since you guys are running a PR campaign to draw in more members, I would like to take this opportunity to do some advertising for tech sellers and tech buyers! Let's add a best tech buyer award and a best tech seller award. (They are way more useful to you than, who is the most active alliance or join us we are the the baddest or something...)

[quote name='EricCartman' timestamp='1326059604' post='2895877'] Who said you have the power to be disrespectful to me.? I am reconizable with just one account and do not feel it would help me any if I made another. [/quote] Just wanted to make sure you know the rules, I welcome and respect everyone, the more the merrier. Good luck.

You can't have more than 1 account you know that right?

[quote name='greco' timestamp='1325200508' post='2888800'] I will forever be known as the man who killed myths nation lol ( my nation was last to war his) Good luck in real life hope all works out well for you Wish I knew sooner I wouldn't have wasted nukes and money spying on ya lol Have a good break see ya when u get back RoadRash [/quote] Myth comes back just to make you fail. This man hates you very much.

Slot closed. Thank you.

Slot closed. Thank you.

Slot closed. Thank you.

my bad, wrong forum

[quote name='paul711' timestamp='1325711764' post='2892588'] relax bro, I am not even RE nor SUN but I can tell you that AA rank overall means little. You are fighting alongside TPC and LE 2 of the best fighting AAs in TE communicate and counter. [/quote] OK, but you can't denied the fact that this is the perfect opportunity to end RE and SUN. You have to fight them in the end anyway and would there be a better day than today to pick a fight with them? And, there is always the prize money, but hey, maybe you never gotten it because RE, SUN, and their lapdogs always got in the way in the end? Please think of the end game, I'm just pointing out the fact here. This is TE, mass alliances have a lot of weight here. And, wouldn't it be fun to beat the crap out of two top alliances?

[quote name='jraenar' timestamp='1325666784' post='2892210'] As of a few hours before war, it was: [code] Nations NS ANS Nukes 15k+ 10k+ 7k+ 5k+ RE/SUN/Syn 106 713k 6722 205 3 21 42 71 APC/LE/TPC/CoS/LoSS/WAPA 128 766k 5989 169 2 19 45 75 [/code] EDIT: If you take out the 3 APC, 3 LoSS, 1 LE and 1 WAPA we didn't bother assigning as targets, ANS goes to 6372 for APC/LE/TPC/CoS/LoSS/WAPA. [/quote] What are you afraid of? You going around telling everyone that this fight is evenly match so we wouldn't call in our allies and your old enemies to roll you? How about we remind everyone that Roman Empire and SUN are the top two alliances on TE, with the most members, and you two are corroborating. Once this is over, you two will steamroll everyone, one by one? Or how about this is a great chance, or might be the only chance to send both of you into oblivion if other pile on top of you right now? How about we remind synergy, that once you two back out, they will be gang-banged? How about that? Well? We are just doing our thing and not bothering anyone but you, the two alliance with the MOST MEMBERS, go around and come up with a scheme like this? You are asking for trouble.

Did you know beer came from Mars and bacon came from Venus? Do you even know what that means? They are from outta space!!! THEY ARE FROM OUTTA SPACE!!! MAN!!! They're here to take over the WORLD! They've been planning this for billions of years! THEY ARE KILLING EVERYBODY MAN!!! You got Beers holding Bacons and jamming down your arteries! This is serious man! WAKE UP AMERICA!!! The Bacons are Commies! They already occupied Wall street! They are coming! WAKE UP AMERICA!!!

DON'T YOU MESS WITH BACON AND BEER!!!

[quote name='WorldConqueror' timestamp='1324700951' post='2885384'] Yes. I guess we have different ideas of what constitutes worst. Insults are fine for me, whereas childish, intellectually-stunted, dead meme-laden alliances based around beer and bacon are not. But hey, at least I didn't bridge dwell the OP as was my first instinct. [/quote] I just noticed you mentioned beer there, that was not cool. Didn't you know the saying "Insult bacon at your own peril, disrespect beer and you shall be overcomed."

[quote name='WorldConqueror' timestamp='1324700951' post='2885384'] Yes. I guess we have different ideas of what constitutes worst. Insults are fine for me, whereas childish, intellectually-stunted, dead meme-laden alliances based around beer and bacon are not. But hey, at least I didn't bridge dwell the OP as was my first instinct. [/quote] Please don't insult bacon. Bacon is a legitimate food group.

[quote name='lord bitburg' timestamp='1324687410' post='2885203'] Merry Christmas Fark! always a class act! BLT dip recipe serves 13 firemen, its a all orderve day at the firehouse. 2 lb Bacon (Bacon is its own food Group) fryed, not crunchy, cut to small peices 2 lb roma tomatoes chopped 16 oz sour cream 8oz Mayo or to dip consistancy salt to taste Mix and chill, toast bread and cut to quaters for dipping Guys at the firehouse love it, but hell its BACON I see Corbetto of Toosoonia is fighting as usual, he once sent me a great recipe for bacon wrapped pork chops after a brutal battle. (AGAIN BACON) I will have Bitburger Pilsner on tap and cold if you stop by for the Holidays [/quote] You like Bacon? Try this! 1) Make or buy your chocolate mug. 2) Find a bakeable mug that is the same size and shape as your chocolate mug, then wove that bakeable mug in bacon, bake it, cool it, then replace your bakeable mug with your chocolate mug. Fill that with something cool. I still couldn't figure out how that guy poured hot cheese in his cup, if you do, let me know. Don't try hot cheese with this cup, it'll melt. Merry X-mas Oh! Here are the links if you don't know what I'm talking about. http://askville.amazon.com/purchase-prepared-chocolate-liquer-shot-glasses-dessert-cups/AnswerViewer.do?requestId=7793043 http://www.neatorama.com/2009/11/20/bacon-mug/

[quote name='PaladinePSoT' timestamp='1321073476' post='2843553'] Remove the limit to the number of defensive wars. Problem solved. Think about it. [/quote] Yes it would. Then which ever alliance has the most people, win. Wait, how does that change things? There is also the problem with the server overload. Let say, I declare war on everyone in my range, and everyone declares war on everyone else (a rogue paradise) I wonder what would happen? [quote name='Ironfist' timestamp='1321176850' post='2844062'] I apologise. I didn't know it needed an argument. Removing the number of defensive slots means nations can get completely decimated within a day. That won't help new players who are getting raided. Though I like your other thing about the unlimited range for declaring upward. That has potential, but the first thing, nope. [/quote] No, at worst you get nuke once with 1 defeat alert and however many of CMs and bombings. It's pretty bad but not 1 day, unless, of course, you keep buying back troops for people to hit you with. Please keep in mind that there is also the NS ranged limit. Bigger nations have fewer enemies and smaller nations... do they matter? [quote name='Instr' timestamp='1324429584' post='2882913'] I've considered changing the war limits myself as a type of solution. It would work in the sense that you would be able to deal catastrophic damage to a large nation; nuke, then launch large waves of attacks against a foe with little ground attack ability. There would be ways around it, however. For example, the large nation could simply turtle; and thus by sacrificing the ability to attack / defend tech via the ground, you'd be limiting your ground damage to one DA a day. One problem with the proposed change, is that it's potentially too radical. It would make it so that the established players would have no real advantage over newcomers with significant forces. The cost of the various nations would also change dramatically; it simply makes the game unplayable for elite alliances to face the threat of being mobbed by throngs of zerging nations that only cost 6 months to build. There is also the issue of long-term logistics; for example, the zergers typically would have very low warchests, and thus would be unable to sustain a long-term attack. They will run out of warchest faster than the large nation would; especially if the large nation denies them earnings through turtling, and when that happens, the small nations are just wrecked, without the logistic potential to rebuild, and are likely to quit the game. While the problem with the game is the relevancy of new players and new structures, making it so that old nations would be completely endangered would make it so that the existing playerbase would be further incentivized to depart. Going too far in one direction, to the point where you completely remove the advantages of the existing playerbase, is not a solution. [/quote] I disagree because you are forgetting the NS range limit. Now, finally my point. If I want to play a game that focuses on war, I wouldn't play a text-based game. The problem with Cyber Nations, I believe, is that the focus has shifted to alliance wars and tech raids and away from politics and nations building. Look at all these people above me, talking about annihilation, battle tactics, war logistics. What? What the hell? I'm sure there are better games out there for those! Even flash games do a better job! What happened to the days where people make youtube videos to declare some sort of belief and actually negotiated and role-played as nations? Now-a-days I see alliances doing bro-dances in secret then go into war. Wasup bro? you respect me bro? no respect bro? BRO LETS ROLL! So, how are you going to increase "politics and nations buildings" elements exactly? How are you going to change that? I don't know, so good luck with that! Merry X-mas.