[The GOONS war machine]

GOONS must be so

[Three]

Suddenly, a wild mudkip appears!

mudkip uses hydro pump!

It's super effective!

Johnas fainted!

[Can I Get An Amen?]

Haflinger, I'm fairly certain it's still the same... I only use FB to keep track of what everyone's up to because now unless it's Facebook official, it might not be happening. -.-

[Can I Get An Amen?]

Kill it with fire. No surrender.

[I Love Rebel Virginia]

A different color would be great... perhaps yellow? Or even - dare I say - black?

Half the time I want to kill youwith fire - the other half I want to crack open a cold one with you. The third half, I feel like doing both at the same time.

[A month and a half: How long is 'aggressive defence' justified?]

What does tech raiding have to do with this? I support tech raiders paying reps, I support TOP/IRON paying reps; I don't support C&G squeezing them as hard as they can for near-record quantities of tech, just like I wouldn't support a tech raid victim suing for 2 billion in 'damages'.

Tech raiding is an analogous type of attack. A blind-sided attack by one party, resulting in damages by the other party.

I think the only reason you're saying TOP and friends shouldn't be paying as much as has been asked is because you're buddy buddy with those individuals. Objectively, TOP dun $%&@ed up big-time. They should have to pay big-time for said $%&@ up. Saying otherwise is not looking at the situation objectively.

[A month and a half: How long is 'aggressive defence' justified?]

I simply don't understand the attitude that if you attack me and I repel that attack I have some compulsion to stop counterattacking.

I agree. I find Bob's bias especially amusing considering his very vocal attitudes concerning tech-raid targets.

Historical context and all that crap aside Bob, how is this any different than a tech-raider biting off more than they can chew? Should TOP/IRON not have to nut-up and take their licks since it was they who initiated this conflict?