Jump to content

BrilliantGenius

Members
  • Posts

    432
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Posts posted by BrilliantGenius

  1. I don't see them "crying" about it. All I see is half a page filled up with stuff over a tech raid. I would think that a quick look at WAPA would show you mean what you say, and people should heed that warning. I just feel that adding this thread is not going to help, if people didn't get it after seeing the war declarations then they deserve to be destroyed.

  2. "Cry more"

    "0/ hail destroyers of WAPA"

    "you're a retard"

    Look, mommy! It's a Legion Troll! I thought they were extinct!

    WAPA, you guys retaliated with nukes so you're probably going to be killed now. From what I've seen, you really need to get some membership control. It was a lack of control that got you into this war, and a lack of control that allowed your members to respond with nuclear attacks, and the combination of the two have doomed your alliance.

  3. i would like to direct your direction to something happening

    http://cybernations.net/stats_alliance_sta...liance=\m/

    omg look \m/ reformed omg no way

    i know everyone hates \m/

    we want to work with nppo to settle our differences we will conform for the most part more announcements to come soon

    we will meet demands from the orders to let us survive all we want to do is restore the name of \m/

    they can contact me in game for all the demands

    i mean rrly iys 3 nations what harm can come of this, most likely it will fall apart any way so...

    ok now let the hate/flame/trolling start

    now

    No. There is no \m/. \m/ died. Now quit using the name of \m/ in such a trashy way.

  4. I was just pointing out that there are no excuses IC to create drama over this. But what the heck, I know that almost all great wars in CN were caused by OoC conflicts and I understand why you are doing this. I just think that people should try to keep it civil and don't mix OoC and IC.

    Ironic coming from a member of an alliance that not only smuggled in but promoted the leader of GPA during the first real OOC incident.

  5. There seems to be an awful lot of corruption and behind - doors politics in GPA. It's time for a purge.... and it's really up to the GPA gov on how the purge will be done. They can do it themselves, or it can be done for them. The government of GPA has become so bloated, beurocratic and corrupt that it is now risking the infra of every member. And the government, as Valid has shown, is way too greedy to give up their power so that the alliance is not killed. I can't see this ending well.

  6. Okay, so they elect a government. You don't like them so you tell them to change it. They change it and bend over backwards to appease your appetite for destruction. Now you say they can't keep an elected government. They are damned if they do and damned if they don't.

    We all know you are just building reasons to attack them. Nothing will ever be good enough. It's too bad you can't reclaim the #1 spot according to CN stats by growing your membership and strength. Leveling threat after threat until most of their membership leaves giving you back the #1 spot is really low, even for the Orders.

    I love how you convieniently left out a few important incidents.

    • Dilber's post edited by Valid
    • Demanding unreasonable reps from LSF, a nearly ZIed alliance, after letting NoV destroy them
    • Allowing people in their IRC channel to make horrible OOC attacks, and not kicking or banning them
    • Veiled threats of hacking

    But if you included the facts it would make your arguement's lack of merit apparent, wouldn't it? You aren't helping your cause. With every post like this where you skew the facts you present to reach an erroneous conclusion driven out of hate for the Orders, your credibility diminishes. After seeing posts like these from you, the NADC thread you posted seems less and less likely to be true at all, let alone 100% factual.

  7. I can imagine if GPA was to go to war it would take a while and a lot, a LOT of loss' on both sides

    I highly doubt that.

    And please, Scholar, you're making yourself look like a joke again. I agree with your point of view, but seriously, you're going overboard. And stop calling people spineless when you're sitting on red, benefiting from the protection that NPO graciously offers you, and not taking any risks of getting hurt fighting alongside them. Even GPA has more spine than that.

  8. ...Quoting Farung as proof of your innocence? Seriously? Come on. Its Farung.

    Geez...Am I the only one who remembers the one hundred times Farung made false posts and claims?

    Also: See you on the battlefield.

    Well, I see screenshots proving FAN did this, and NO screenshots proving NADC did this......

    Seriously, man, give us some of this evidence that you seem to have so much of. I'd really love to see it.

×
×
  • Create New...