Jump to content

Rush Sykes

Members
 View Profile  See their activity

  • Posts

    3,329

  • Joined

  • Last visited

 Content Type 

Blog Comments posted by Rush Sykes

  3. Duckz3

    Posted

    Now class, take a look at this post. There comes a time in every debate when there is simply no other way to refute your opponents, so you have to resort to a more personal and often times sexually aimed attacks. In short, Ad hominem attacks are the best line of defense when no other available defense plan is available. The occasional use of caps contributes to the overall effect of the message, which demonstrates you've really backed yourself into a corner with no way out. Only MacGyver could get out of that trap.

    Professor Marx's Grade of this entry: C+, room for improvement. Needs more references about \m/'s immorality and the overall stupidity of those around you while painting yourself in an intellectual light. Reduce usage of elipses.

    I am not sure you could have missed the point more, if you tried. Also, I am not trying to paint myself in any intellectual light, you see, the difference between you, and me, and probably most other people, I will freely admit that my "style" in this blog, has been slumming for me. To be quite honest, its fun to slum sometimes, while still making a valid point, which nobody seems to care about because they are all too busy trying to save the world from GMs super secreat spai ring.

  5. Duckz3

    Posted

    So if this was anyone else they would be ZI'd? In a week GM will forget that this even happend and probably do it in another month. Also, Who hasnt been annoyed by GM? You are basically are condoning Muffins actions Rush.

    Thanks

    Joss <3

    Am I condoning Green Muffins making a silly joke that has been made 4579823783 times by 47982782309 other people, and thereby luring you into running to save the word with your information...and in the process, making you look like a complete unadulterated moron? Why yes, I am condoning that.

  8. Duckz3

    Posted

    Ill give you a list of people whom where in this call: mhawk, Havok, Myself, Saltar, GreenMuffins, CptBlck, WickedJ and Silver Empress. When I join the call. After Saltar had been asked to join the alliance, I asked them if they where serious. They said yes. I then Quired Havok warning him. Those are a lot of Foriegners from Athens in the call. I believe only myself Havok and Saltar spoke to CptBlck and Green Muffins. This is a foriegn matter not an internal matter. And unless you are supporting the creation of a Spy alliance Rush, You cant say that their isn't anything wrong with this.

    I dont care if Jesus Christ, God, Allah, and Almight Admin himself were in the call..GET IT...I dont care. Dont care who was on the grassy knoll...dont care if we landed on the moon or not... This conspiracy, is roughly as credible as those alluded to earlier. And yes...Joss...given your history... Im sure if he WERE serious..he would have told YOU. I mean..why wouldnt he...its such a loving relationship. The REALLY sad part about ALL of this... is YOU are better than this. At least, I once thought you were. Time, I suppose, to rethink that.

  9. Duckz3

    Posted

    They can't win the argument so they have to resort to baseless ad hominem attacks.

    There is absolutely no argument to be won. In the end, Joss knows it was just GM being GM. His "public service message" in this blog was for no other purpose than to lob at jab at GM because the 2 have had issues for a while now. And GM, not being the brightests bulb on the string, exacerbates the problem, and oft times makes it EASY to do this sort of thing, because he gives less than .0000001 seconds of thought to anything he says. EVERYONE who knows him, knows this. And I will say one more time...so it cannot be misunderstood... Marx...Damsky...Joss...ANYONE...who even for ONE second believed that this was "real"....is in need of a full time drool cup holder.

  12. Duckz3

    Posted

    It effects far more than your internal policies when outsiders are invited to skype calls.

    I can only assume that there is a part of "NON ISSUE" that you don't get. Basically, a non issue means that we told him to stop talking like an idiot. Not one of us..NOT ONE OF US...just to be clear... gave even 1 second of consideration to the fact that he was even one bit serious. So in the interest of being diplomatic, I will say to everyone spouting "zomg GM wants to spai" idiocy in this thread.... We did what needed to be done, you may now all carry on with your retardation.

  15. Duckz3

    Posted

    I'm going to stop you right there and say "double standards are a horrible thing."

    Edit: Didn't you recently roll TPF for just as much as GM did? "Intent to spy" is exactly what I'm seeing here.

    Are you REALLY this stupid? Or are you just pretending, because you dont want to give up the idiotic position you already took on this? No, you are COMPLETELY right..its EXACTLY the same thing TPF did. Minus the actual existence of the alliance, minus the government involvement in the alliance...and minus any actual intentions of said alliance existing. Yep..EXACTLY the same.

  17. Duckz3

    Posted

    For some reason I'm inclined to believe this. GM invited me to a skype call with CptBlack (claiming he wanted to meet Londo. How he came to this conclusion I don't know)

    Well this is certainly damming evidence.

    /me rolls eyes

    Nobody is denying that he almost certainly something like that. Then you think of WHO you are talking about...and go...oh..its GM...and you chuckle and you move on. If none of you have figured this by now, I suggest a reading comprehension course.

  18. Duckz3

    Posted

    If only this was a Feud Jgoods, He actually did invite Saltar into a Skype call and ask him to join a "Secret Spying Alliance." He Also admitted to planning on creating the alliance with HavoK, Athens Gov't. In the Skype Call. Before you attempt to slander me, Please get your facts straight.

    Thanks

    Joss

    He also randomly queries people and asks them to have sex with him. Im guessing this is roughly as serious. You know better than this Joss. Quite disappointing tbh.

  19. Ejayrazz

    Posted

    Lets see, War of the Coalition we destroyed an alliance that clearly stated they wanted us dead. Karma War we entered on the side of most of our allies and actually became good friends with some of our opponents. This war we entered as part of Polar's coalition against a bloc that has constantly trolled us and made their hate for us known. And no we weren't planning to kill CnG, a war came up where we would be on opposite sides and we took the chance to blitz you (yea, yea, you weren't even going to enter. :rolleyes: )

    Clearly we have a history of attacking random alliances just because we can. Something that no CnG alliance would ever do. lol

    ZOMG some of us trolled you! The horror! Grow thicker skin perhaps? Seriously...don't give me that nonsense that a war arose where you would be on the opposite side, so you blitzed us. At least be honest, Crymson was. The war arose WITH Polar on what you perceived as the side "against" us. Had that exact same war set up without Polar at its helm, you would all still be untouched. You tried to take advantage of a situation, and you lost.

  21. Ejayrazz

    Posted

    Then why are you worried about us being a future threat? If you didn't want us to be a future threat you would think that you wouldn't give us a reason to be angry at you.

    I am not the least bit concerned about you being a future threat. See, this may surprise you, but everyone has different reasons for their pursuit of reps. They are all equally legitimate...and illegitimate(base on perspective of course)...I simply want all of my nations grieving widows and mothers to be compensated for their loss. How many cyber dollars do you put on the value of a cyber-life?

  22. Ejayrazz

    Posted

    Thanks for clarifying, I thought it was directly pointed at me. To get on with the rest:

    In terms of my ego, I am a bitter old man in CN age and relatively remain silent, but I understand your ego must be defiant; resulting in you acting like the cynical bad $@! and anyone else referencing anything opposing your view is, well, is deemed a crier, but yet, you'll take the time to cry about crying since mentioning anything at all is crying, right? Rofl, nice rhetoric.

    Yes, your side cries just as much as TOP does, but you failing to recognize it really grasps your perception -- especially since I am on your side in this war, following VE on the Polaris front. What I see is most of our side crying, and when TOP responds, they cry even harder. How the hell am I beacon of anything when opposing the same very side I am suppose to be fighting for? Swing and miss, but that is okay, keep patting yourself on the back. Someone cares, I am sure, till then, we'll have to wait. However, what you fail is reading comprehension in the sense where I never fully supported white peace as I stated the idea is idealistic more than realistic, thus, here we are arguing sensible reps versus redundant reps. Which is which? Who knows, it comes down to moral fiber and subjective opinions, but when others take unnecessary jabs, such as ego and other nonsense, well, we got a response such as this. I understand you need to be the tough internet bad $@!, but lets try keeping this on the subject without the jabs, mmk? You will dictate how civil this conversation is.

    My argument does not fail, you bring a sentence into an argument and expect anyone to believe in its validity? No u.

    These actions; requiring MONTHS for those to pay reparations DO in fact cause political stagnations and HAVE done so in the past: Are you politically ignorant, or do you seriously have no recollection of what has occurred in the past? However, I never once stated the entire web would be frozen, now did I? No, I did not, I said it results in political stagnation on TOPs' front as nothing happens (With them in particular), however I admit I will make it clearer as I can see the confusion, but if you wish to make a thread, we can fully analyze it into the upcoming of micro alliances (Which spiraled up after Karma), disgruntled feelings between allies, and general conduct in this war (Since you wished to get this subject off-hand). The idea of reps came from behind the computer, and IC developed from OOC, that is, if people believe in the IC/OOC line which is another story in itself.

    Also, in terms of social direction, please don't preach. A blog is not expecting social change, but rather social discussion. You think someone with your intelligence would grasp that?

    I should note I feel no need to talk to your little fan boys to uprise your ego further into you believing you're not so serious, and in fact, you're SO 'UNSERIOUS', you took the time to dedicate nearly an entire paragraph into making me believe it. Holy !@#$ you failed.

    Writing a blog makes me so serious. SO SERIOUS. DON'T YOU GET IT?

    I agree that you should be less serious. Classes are offered weekdays from 2PM to 4PM EST.

×
×
  • Create New...