Farrin Xies
-
Posts
638 -
Joined
-
Last visited
Content Type
Profiles
Forums
Blogs
Gallery
Posts posted by Farrin Xies
-
-
Adminspeed to my friends in TORN. o/
-
Communication was atrocious in the EQ coalition, between the Skype calls, far too many chans for different purposes, etc.Honestly I don't blame NPO and I am willing to believe that there were just mistakes made in communicating the agenda of the coalition effectively, and that lines of communications failed.
-
And this very specifically is why R&R got the better end of this deal.we will be just fine without you
-
I already miss Bambi. Garion, you've got some big shoes to fill! :)
-
As has been mentioned, anyone surprised by this is doing it wrong. Although I do miss the ampersand. :(
-
/me points out that Pacifica only holds 2 of the Red Senate seatsGATO doesn't own Brown. They're not the NPO of Brown Sphere...
Nevertheless, congrats. :awesome:
o/ NSF -
My God, what have you done? You put Rush back into a position of almost power!
I'm gonna miss Mandy and Wyrmon (though I didn't get many chances to talk to the latter), but congrats to the new gov, and I look forward to working with you. -
Nice line-up there, Farkers. Plus to make it even better, I'm drunk enough right now to find it amusing!
(no, but really, I chuckled at the announcement. You can blame my love for old-school, Bob Barker-led Price is Right for that) -
Thanks for heading this up, bros.
New Pacific Order - Farrin Xies - I'm legit -
Good luck, NG, you'll certainly need it.
Or something. -
Imperial Notice of Protection
Henceforth, the New Pacific Order will be protecting the Oceania AA for the next thirty days, or until the AA is evacuated; whichever comes first. Any attacks on the AA will be considered tantamount to an act of war against Pacifica herself.
Farrin Xies,
Emperor of the New Pacific Order
Red,
Imperial Regent of the New Pacific Order
Jrenster,
Imperial Officer of Foreign Affairs of the New Pacific Order
Lord Valleo,
Imperial Officer of Foreign Affairs of the New Pacific Order -
o/
Love me some Non Grata. Congrats on two years, and let's make sure to cause a ruckus in year three together. -
Can't be too careful; let's disband CN.Auctor, I think we ought to disband AZTEC. We should probably disband our alliances, too, just to be safe.
-
That's some fine allies you've got there now, LPH.
-
Pansy is without a doubt a legend in this game. We are lesser as a community for not having him in it.
-
Regarding Ai... what in the hell are you talking about?Ahh yes, the standard Pacifican denial tactic. :smug:
I said to a few people as the war was winding down that we'll see where NPO's strategy gets them. So far no closer to C&G, lost the IRON treaty, and AI, who stood to be a loyal spear carrier for you, semi-imploded and your man there fell from the Triumvirate. Not well so far. But hey, the post-war is young and people are distracted by other targets. You can still salvage things...maybe. -
Even with this cancellation, I still like IRON. You can disagree and still like someone.My dealings with IRON have been nothing but pleasant. The diplomats they send to us are top notch and I wish them nothing but the best going forward.
NPO, it is hard to get told you aren't good enough anymore, I know it. I want you to know I am here for you both to comfort you and take IRON's sloppy seconds :wub: . :wub:
Also, thank God we've got someone on whose shoulder we can cry. :P -
Have we ever said otherwise? :)Well maybe our image/political standing shouldn't be too bad seeing as the big players on the Eq side admit it was a planned war in large part meant to reduce our power and "untouchable" position. :P
-
You're cute, kid. I'm definitely shaking in my boots right now.Herp derp, derpity derp.
Nightmare448
~The Peoples Champion of the NPO -
I'm sorry, Ai knew what would happen if they jumped the gun with YOU?! You, along with us and others, were fighting FOR Ai here.AI knew what would happen if they jumped the gun with us, INT has CnG which severely overrules our ODP, and we can not defend NG from the opposite side. I am not sure how those last 2 can be brought into argument, we can not fight for those on the other side? Sure you can negotiate and try and keep them from being hit, but we control nothing besides our mouse in this game.
-
IRON's war? Everybody knows that Brehon was who wanted that war so badly because his grudges with Umbrella and he started the war knowing that their allies in CnG would be fucked due their obligations, so no, NPO didn't stick for all its allies, if that was the case Brehon should had used diplomacy and save CnG from fighting a losing war. What EQ showed - not one, but two times, - is that when NPO want something they don't care how it will affect their allies, they just go for it. They harmed their CnG allies starting the war and harmed their other allies finishing the war before everyone else wanted.
Oh wow, not even sure where to start. Do you not think if we could have waved a magic wand and not had our friends and allies in CnG or NG on the other side, you really think we wouldn't have taken that in a heartbeat? CnG told us they felt responsible for enabling the actions on DH's part we were waging war against, and thus should share in some of the repercussions for that. I don't completely agree with that, but I sure as hell respect it. My respect for many of my allies on the opposite side of the coalition rose by leaps and bounds just as my respect for many people (though not our allies) on "our" side in EQ dropped.
As for harming our allies the second time you mentioned, I'd say that's between me and my allies. Everything Brehon did in this last war was for Ai first, our other allies second, and the coalition third. Continuing the war as many of you wanted would have done nothing but hurt Ai, NPO, and the tiny number of other alliances willing to send out even one or two more people into the extended war. As far as continuing the war in general, we were rapidly approaching the point where the damage we were doing to them was less than the damage they were doing back to us. At that point in time, you take your victory and go home. It could have been done differently, and I likely would have done it differently. With that said, I'm satisfied with the outcome it achieved. -
My apologies, Goldie, wasn't sure what you meant there :)I'm not, I was responding to the accusation of two others holding it up. I do know how difficult it was to get ahold of IRON's gov that war, but they were being accused of pushing for reps, etc, which wasn't true. Wasn't true of you guys either.
-
...please tell me you're not saying we held up peace talks? You do understand left to the devices of some in the EQ Coalition we'd likely still be at war, right? If NPO and Ai hadn't set their foot down? For that matter, literally the last sigs affixed to the peace document were IRON's because of the trouble finding IRON gov to pass the information on to.goldielax25, on 22 May 2013 - 10:25, said:
I can tell you first hand how easily people will believe any lies they're told if people tell it enough times. Doesn't make it true. Anyone actually involved in the peace talks would agree that AI and IRON were not the ones holding up peace. -
Good luck moving forward, IRON.
IRON's membership deserves a huge amount of credit for fighting, and fighting hard. And I find it amusing to hear that we weren't communicating with the rest of the coalition, when we were communicating on a daily basis with all the major players [ooc]on Skype, on IRC, and on the war boards which, coincidentally, we hosted.[/ooc]. As someone whose task was to be in regular communication with many of the rest of the coalition, I can tell you you couldn't be more wrong and need to go back under your bridge.Lurunin, on 22 May 2013 - 09:51, said:
Wow this was unexpected lol.
To anyone saying IRON didn't fight for the coalition, that's funny as hell. I was on VE front with them and we struggled to find any open defensive slots whatsoever. They were the ones putting most of the mid tier ans upper tier pressure on alliances trying to make sure they were to get side lined. NPO didn't come close the the effort they put in and we can go back months to see the "NPO supporters" saying the exact same thing.
NPO engaged in limited warfare, did not communicate with the coalition at all, and above all placed their allies on the other side to a higher importance than the coalition they were supposedly leading.
[ooc]The "secret terms" were only secret because Brehon had the logs, I didn't. When I was asked for them, I told y'all to wait for Brehon to come back. What happened as soon as he came back that night? You got the damned terms. Stop rehashing old conspiracy theories, they make you look even more ridiculous.[/ooc]Lurunin, on 22 May 2013 - 10:00, said:
And that's also why they tried to pass secret terms that almost resulted in the entire coalition to break down while demanding they release the details
From the War Office of Bear Force One
in Alliance Announcements (IC)
Posted
This thread continues to be amusing. It's dropping my IQ rapidly, but it's amusing nonetheless.