ADude

Riding someone else's coattails making you feel big? Good, I'm glad for you.

Never thought that I would live to see the day!

Replying to this because I just saw it, I've been trying to turn my flamethrower down a little this round but with that being said... When is the last time you fought SToR? It wasn't last round that's for sure. And as far as this alliance It's a strange thing to attack an "alliance member" in the same round no? Have some wars been convenient? Definitely, but that's just been the nature of the game when the only targets for D1 are AW, NLoN and occasionally OP (I'm seeing a repeat of last round so far in that situation...) Either way, I enjoy the challenges of rebuilding and where that takes us later in the round.

I just appreciate that ya'll finally admitted to being D1 all along.

I for one like being a cowboy WALL-E..

@admin - Going into the new round I was hopeful that some of the new changes in SE could be moved over here with a few changes. Daily log in bonus - Obviously modified however works best. A couple new changes - Remove Sabotage IRS Proficiency. In my and many others experience it does nothing but discourages the losing side as they cannot catch up when they get hit with this. In the relatively small time frame we have in TE it does more harm than good. Penalty for excessive peace - I don't have any specifics worked out here but I was thinking something along the lines of the SE Peace mode penalties apply to your nation after 14 days of no war. (Offensive or Defensive) ( A good in game example of this was OP sitting for most of the round essentially in peace mode but did not suffer any economic damage from it) Most Money Spent award - Can we remove this from public view? It's too easy to work out how much a player has on hand at the moment. Incentivize casualties - Possibly economic bonuses for hitting certain casualty counts, maybe for every 250k we get 2 happiness points up to 1 million casualties? Update or clarification on terms - Mostly looking for clarification here as I've had a couple questions about multiple players on the same network in TE . From SE terms and conditions From TE terms and conditions

As someone who fought in the Doomhouse war (Boogeyman), that makes me feel a little dirty 😁 Bring the casualties

I like the draft idea better

For more giggles

What is it that we have done exactly? What "rules"? The ones that make you feel fuzzy on the inside? I am officially requesting a hard cover copy of the "Rules" please. Thank you. Also for giggles

Which rules? These ones?

OOC - I was being harsh in that last one in the opening comment, I edited it out. Apologies. Also I just wanted to keep this here for record keeping Insert whats convenient for you.... Bless...

Edit In your own words you said "Not accepting anymore truces" - Nothing about time frames there. Do you think you can try to change the narrative like you do with everything else on this?

Seems to me like they did the same thing that you did earlier in the round, something that I can quote you as saying "Not a big deal". Also you aren't accepting any truces, that's why we are offering it to your members instead.

I have no idea? Maybe Al didn't want to be a part of it? Of course Al isn't leading this time around... Also if we are basing this off of last year you should consider this to be our stance on it if we did happen to be in it. Also we are offering it to individual nations because YOU have made it very clear that you have no intent of this war going anywhere but forward and we know that there are players who would prefer to not have to worry about the game while busy with family or vacations. Edit - I just noticed that there is some interesting talk in that thread about someone violating a truce by 15 minutes being a big deal, strange.

It was Jiros - I would be interested in a draft system tbh, might be fun for a round. Maybe me and Mitten can play in the same AA.

It's been something since like round 6

¯\_(ツ)_/¯ Edit because I need to give an actual response It sounds like you just listed a couple reasons why people would rogue you? You don't think that there might be a few more players around that feel the same? Also to be fair SToR was hit with ONE nation early in the round.

I have no idea about that, this is my second round having any interaction with you guys, considering that you have AA's named after their distain for you specifically and your previous members were part of those rogues... I would be more inclined to disagree with your statement.

Probably because people don't like you.

In other news - @Lord Hitchcock has been ZI'd - Time to pack it up boys..

You cannot "dog pile" someone that is continuing to hit you, that's not how it works. Although I guess defending ourselves is out of the question, infact we had other plans and wanted to ignore SToR but Mitten forced our hand on that unfortunately. Also we are the only alliance in the game that has hit every AA, how many have ya'll declared on this round? Better yet how many alliances have you hit that weren't already involved in war or that you had to break a truce to do so. 🤡

I'm sorry but I don't think you understand that... they hit us by continuing to spy outside of what was a very legitimate war. Ya'll hitting us while we were in that continued war though? Well that's just a case of what would D2 be without D1?

We retaliated against SToR because they continued to spy us outside of war, spying last I checked was an act of war.

That's a lot coming from someone whos offensive wars this round have only been on the backs of other on-going wars...... 🤡