Starcraftmazter
-
Posts
2,690 -
Joined
-
Last visited
Content Type
Profiles
Forums
Blogs
Gallery
Posts posted by Starcraftmazter
-
-
-
It may be effective but it is NOT necessary. If nations don't really want to be involved in nuclear war, they should be able to choose so.
That's some flawed logic there. Can nations in RL choose whether they want to be involved in nuclear warfare or not? I think it's pretty outrageous to give that choice, as it's not up to any nation. It's just how the game works, and nukes are a feature of the game, but this wonder will ruin the feature.
Attacking nations can fire nukes until one makes it through. It does nothing to nuclear warfare's effectiveness; just makes it faster.It does have something to do with it, because nations are going to be wasting a lot of nukes.
If you spend 100 mill on the Manhattan project, and trade for uranium and have nukes, I don't think it will be nice, having those nukes "fail".
-
Friendly IRCops - main thing. The IRCops on Esper hate CN and have a !@#$%^&* "Zero Tolerance Policy". If they don't want us there, then we'd be better off going somewhere where the IRCops are friendly and not egotistical spazzes.
What are these IRCops you speak of? What role do they play as far as using the network goes?
-
I personally think there are too many military wonders. But specifically this:
Strategic Defense Initiative (SDI) - $75,000,000 - Reduces odds of a successful nuclear attack against your nation by 75%. The SDI wonder also requires 3 satellites and 3 missile defenses and those satellites and missile defenses cannot be deleted once the wonder is developed.I think it's a pretty bad choice, nuclear warfare is both effective and necessary, and this would make it pretty redundant.
-
If people are pissed off about DEFCON 2-4 not being used, just delete them and have DEFCON 1 and 5 as the only ones in the game.
THIS
I think that's probably the BEST idea I have ever heard regarding defcon. Best Idea EVER.
-
There's no way we could get everyone from SynIRC to move to Coldfront, and a lot of people won't move from Esper simply out of laziness.
Could you state the advantages of Coldfront over Esper?
-
Hail MK!
-
You didn't mention me Snowbeast?
<3 buttsekcs
-
I think what NATO asking is reasonable, and given Desolution's character assessment, I don't think anyone would argue that any of his claims against his accusations are truthful. That is if he has even made claims against them, in regards to his messages to one of NATO's members? From what I've seen, he has just been pursuing the fantasy that ALMEA as a reason for all this, and he has continuously been arguing about what happened a little over 2 months ago, and not even commenting about the real reason why he is on NATO's perma-ZI list. Surely this demonstrates his guilt?
-
I know the identity of this V.
He's Edmund Dantes, and he's my father and my mother, my brother, my friend, he is you, he is me, he is all of us
-
Excuse me, but I feel the need to rebute what Desolution said in relations to his dealings with FIST. I, as the leader of FIST would claim authority over his presence in my fair alliance, such that I know the full truth about what happened while he was a member, and I have my government to back me up.
But I wanted to help another alliance grow. I told that other alliance I had experience from a long time. and I started aid chains and guides. then one of them tells NATO. and NATO after 5 months attack me again when I really forgot all about the incident!Okey, pretty much everything in this short amount of text is incorrect.
I guess I'll start from the beginning. Yes, you told us that you have "experience from a long time", but....
Ok I sucked at the game I didn;t know how politics worked.Seems contradicting? Especially given your latest affair, your constant flip-floping about whether you like NATO or not, your constant defiance of the simple conditions NATO placed on you, for getting peace, your consistent acts of annoying of NATO, their great friends - and us at FIST, time and time again prove that you STILL suck at the game and that you STILL don't know how politics work.
Then we move onto you starting chains and guides. Pretty hyperbolic isn't it? You never wrote any guides, and contributed nothing. Your two suggestions, to me, were:
- Nations will have no more than 50 tech until they are past 3999 infra
- Every new nations must get 3 mill.
Which may work fine for the GPA, being the GPA - an alliance with, I am sure, near-infinite aiding capability, no purpose for war and dedicated to nation building, however that would not work for a small alliance like FIST, which does not have such aiding capability, which does not plan to be neutral and which is dedicated to to growing it's military and diplomatic strength.
Your failure, to realise these very simple facts clearly shows that you still know nothing about this game.
Finally, you claim that one of us (maybe me?) told NATO. Well, we didn't have to, NATO being the diplomatic powerhouse they are, always seem to be on top of things, and as such - it was actually NATO whom contacted us. After some short collaboration between us and our NATO colleagues, you were kicked out of FIST because you lied to us on multiple occasions during your very short time in our alliance, and the fact that you never qualified to join FIST, because of matters you failed to inform us about, as clearly required in our sign-up thread.
You also proclaim that you forgot about the ALMEA situation, and it happened 5 months ago. In fact, at the time you were attacked, it happened only 2 months and 8 days ago. I know Anu Drake already clarified this, but I felt the need to to state this once more. Also, what was the incident which occurred 17 days ago, which you mention? Was it also not related to this?
And you say you've forgotten it...well we have already produced screenshots proving otherwise. Here's another one, a conversation between me and you.
http://img148.imageshack.us/img148/7729/proofcf6.png
And that's only part of it. You have preached your credentials as an Emperor of a great alliance to me and others in FIST on more than one occasion on our forums, yet when you are attacked you claim to not remember any of this? Sorry, but this works both ways.
Lastly, I would like to say, pointless as it may be given you still haven't seemed to understand this...
The reasons NATO targetted you have nothing to do with ALMEA - rather they are a result of your behaviour and your indecent actions towards a member of NATO. We all know that you are aware of these actions, the fact that you are ignoring this issue - which is the real issue you should have been trying to deal with - only proves and strengthens your guilt.
On top of all that, your in-despicable actions over the last week have ensured that you will be permanently disqualified from playing this game, by alliances whom understand, true and clear, that you do not deserve the right to play this game and to interact with anyone else whom plays this game.
All this, you have brought upon yourself - every action you take makes the situation worse and worse for you.
I have no idea why you made this thread, but let me make one last, final thing very clear:
- If it was to get peace, You failed
- If it was to get people to sympathize with you, You failed
- If it was to create a bad image for NATO, You failed
The only way for you to stop failing, is to go away and never come back. Please...please do this - it is best for everyone.
You think there's some big conspiracy, that people feel the need to support NATO just because they have treaties with them? I can tell you that from what I've seen, alliances support NATO in this, irrespective of any treaties they have or do not have with them. And when the world hates you, it's usually you - not the world who is at fault.
-
In the movies and such.. It was always easier to move Up then to move down
And we all know what a real depiction of life Hollywood portrays....
-
But lately I've noticed a lot of nations buying a lot of infra per day, like 30 or 40. Why don't we double infra costs after 1k barrier too? It would be excellent for the gameplay.
Infra already costs a lot, this would only serve to benefit large alliances which can afford to send large amounts of aid to their nations, and ruin the game for smaller and mid-sized alliances.
-
This is a game - not real life, so the admin should not implement every real life thing, because most of them quite simply do not apply to the game, and in addition, one of the reasons games like CN are fun, is because they indeed are not 100% realistic.
I think the goal should be to keep the game playable, and this change will fight against this goal.
-
Honestly though, if "V" attacks sometime around the end of November someone has to tell everyone. The day of the attack shall become a holiday.
This.
-
you sir, are incorrect.
That's true - you can't raid people in peace mode.
-
The lines have been drawn... incorrectly.
Hahaha...oh man, I love these threads
-
Fair enough then, that would make sense since I wasn't aware of any others.
-
We've intercepted this private message, after all. We have the element of surprise.
Indeed. Maybe you could set up a massive counter-attack force
-
Not that I endorse the attacks of unaligned, but rather the need to specifically make it known to people in my alliance that people on certain teams cannot be attacked regardless of AA seems a priority.
Besides red, are there any other teams where any alliance has prohibited attacks and/or tech-raiding on unaligned nations?
Thanks.
-
1. Call a gathering of Pacificans at Arseanistan.
2. On Nov. 30th, 11:59 pm, Pacificans are ordered to simultaneously jump off the ground.
3. Upon impact with the ground, Planet Bob will be thrown off it's epicyclic orbit.
4. An extra day is added to November.
5. ?????
6. Profit!
Do not underestimate the power of the Pacifican will. The crystal palace of GPA, once a shining beacon of neutrality will burn to the ground in the crimson of Pacifican flames.
For every action there is an equal, and opposite reaction. The gravity of the Earth is going to pull the Earth towards the people whom jumped, cancelling our the jumping force.
Shh! I said pass it on to people via PM, not on the forums! You've ruined everything >: (Will just have to replan this for February 30th.
LOL!!!!!
I just feel sorry for the nations that don't understand the politcal climate and will attack GPA on the November 30th/1st of DecemberSo you think someone will? Damn, that will be funny!
A question for GPA: Will you guys be on defcon 1 and full military readiness just in case on Nov 30 - Dec 1 ? You know...just in case?
-
Esper. If it ain't broke, don't fix it.
As for being banned, if you follow the rules - you won't get banned, it's pretty simple stuff.
-
What? After I get Zied! Exactly.. not during it!
Yes during it - because you failed the condition upon which peace was granted, you now cannot have peace.
Mate, I suggest you just quit this game - you don't seem to be able to play it.
-
What what?
What did I do? Now see this is unreasonable! First I put this and I said why I can't contact you guys...
Second ,,,, You said I can't talk about NATO AFTER I get ZIed.
AFter and not during this...
You don't seem to be able to take instructions.
You seem to forget things easily.
You seem to go back on your promises.
And Anu Drake didn't say, "you can't talk to nato AFTER you get ZIed", rather it was one of the conditions you would have needed to fulfil, in order for you to get peace after your nation was ZIed, and remain at peace with NATO.
As you have broken that condition, you will now not get peace.
New Wonders
in Gameplay Discussions
Posted · Edited by Starcraftmazter
Then I suggest the admin gives us the ability to easily obtain several thousand nukes to counter the SDI?
Don't know why you're dragging RL politics into this, but what you are saying there, is contrary to the truth.
The problem is, as I've stated elsewhere, is that RL != CN, and for obvious reasons, CN should not try and imitate RL as much as possible, because CN is a game, and fun should be the #1 priority.
Nukes are designed for high-range nations to throw at each other. And this improvement will make this concept redundant. It doesn't make the game more realistic, it removes the purpose of nukes.
In real life there are many ways to deploy nuclear weapons. If you want this game to resemble RL, why not implement some REAL RL stuff? Why not make spies be able to construct nukes and detonate them in the enemy's nation? Why not have an option to sneak a nuclear weapon in? Why not have an option of researching advanced ICBM technology which would make any missile defence pointless?