Well i suppose looking through this thread the purpose seems to have been to get a rise out of us, and sadely we succumbed, myself included. next time I shall act more wisely. Cheers to your doctrine mates
I think alliances and individuals can change but it must be shown through action. Words are hallow and are torn apart in CN regardless of if their are profound and insightful or useless and repetative.
kzoppistan, really now? If you honestly think this is a PR stunt you have not been keeping up with CN, remotely, over the last few months. the current political environment clearly needed this, evident by many individuals posts....
Hail the Sith 0/
After reading your first post Duncan I must say I was kinda offended, you were kinda taking the joke too far.. but then I realized you were serious in your subsequent posts and just laughed my $@! off. Just leave mate, go post on some other thread and leave this one to actual intelligable discourse.
There hasnt been !@#$storms thrown up constantly about bandwagoning or treaty complications in almost every single war since the beginning of time... woops, sorry, guess im on the wrong planet....
I am baffled by the stance of why post alliance stances or opinions because we all already know. I saw the same thing in the NPO and Invicta freindship thread, people saying "why post this we already know". The establishment of a crucial stance relating to our alliance I believe is the perfectly fit to be placed where it was.
And for the last time this isnt an instigation of violence but a proclamation of free will.
I'm afraid in CN the tangles of treaties and standards have made this doctrine indeed quite nessecary. Not a PR stunt or an attempt to instigate violence, a exclamation of our views and stance.
The Sith once again makes a choice to conform to no instilled standards but rather what is righteous and just. I cant really see how anyone could mount a pragmatic argument against such...