Jump to content

TIEIXIAIS

Members
  • Posts

    251
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Posts posted by TIEIXIAIS

  1. Mogar, shah, our alliances have long been friendly, we share an ally and have held our friendship treaty for many years. Regardless if how you feel about the war, our alliances are not enemies, let's keep that in mind and cool the rhetoric :P

    Reign the leash in on your own swine. Heaven forbid IRON defend their own ally instead of an allies ally.

  2. I'm in RIA, so... not like we have any treaties linking us to SNX, but I also am not cowardly hiding in peace mode while curbstomping an alliance with ten times the nations on my side. I would suggest asking your government about my war preferences, I'm the last person to be calling coward.

     

    I'm not in coalition planning, but if they wish to burn to make your lives !@#$%* post war? good for them.

    I can see why you're not in war planning.

  3. if SNX wants to burn and further allow your coalition to display how hypocritical they are, it's not a problem to me!

     

    War/Peace Preference:

    peace.gif TIEIXIAIS is a peaceful nation. War is not an option since 11/19/2014.

     

    Feel free to come out and try me.

    I wonder how SNX feels about you being okay with them burning.

    Your getting ahead of yourself. My being in peace mode is not preventing your alliance from declaring war. Nice try though.

  4.  

    There is no basis to assume that. Not for me and then even more so not for you.

     

    You are some kind of a re roll. Well, I have been around too. Due to the memory of past am I disappointed in the present. For those that do not come from many years ago, this all might as well be a fine norm. But it is not for me. Things take too long and with age I lose patience.

    Are you referring to the time when rebuttals had substance, and the wars tact?

  5. Branimir you like to pretend to be intelligent so I'll play along and pretend you are as well. As such I'm sure you can understand in a war no one on our side wanted, we aren't going to make it easy for your coalition. We will be in, make no mistake. We'll be in when we chose and where we chose.

    This war will also go long enough that you'll need to use the forum search to find how long it was before we joined ;)

    Dajobo threatens vietFAN.

    I wonder how many times alliances have thrown out this line. NpO doesn't have the mental capacity to fight a prolonged conflict as the losing side.

  6. Non Grata must be so proud of you RON.

     

     

     

    For crying out loud everyone had that question in their mind, if NG would prefer to work towards rolling TOP or IRON in next war. I'm not surprised they picked us, I don't blame them either, but after how well you managed to dis them last war I wouldn't have been shocked had they chosen the other path as well. 

     

    And I fully understand your paranoia, after that coalition swinging plan you guys cancelled literally hours before exceution in last war, I'd be very paranoid about TOP's revenge as well if I was you. 

    Notice how not a single Non Grata Member has taken your bait to troll IRON?  Please quit mentioning us as if we have common political ground with IRON. 

    I'd also like you to note that The Forge Accords still exist.

    EDIT: Because I can't spell.

  7. I'm just asking, because the LoSS incident was the only case where NG asked for our assistance. A white peace/no re-entry was negotiated (that could have gotten LoSS off NG completely, resolving the whole issue) but was declined by NG. The reason was that LoSS would just re-enter on other coalition members. Fair enough, but then this is no longer IRON's problem, as we are (like you said) not responsible for said coalition.

    You completely ignored my post
     

    You said it yourself.  VE and co would have just shifted NS around, LoSS would have declared on another ally and we NG would be in the exact same position. That is not peace and not in the spirit of any treaty. You can not rightfully begin to humor that as a foul move on Non Grata's part. VE would have done the exact same in Non Grata's position.
  8. That's easy, I never in a hundred years would put an ally who was clearly on the other side in such a position because of a technicality, like NG feeling like it had a claim that it was pre-empted. If I knew 5 alliances were going to be on me, and a sixth was on there because of an unposted treaty, I would have either taken the peace or let it ride out, but I wouldn't have tried to pull an ally who wanted to be on the other side, and had many reasons to be on the other side, into the mess with me.

    You as well as anyone should know that when in a war your objective is peace for the entire coalition. IRON was unwilling and unable to provide that.

    You said it yourself.  VE and co would have just shifted NS around, LoSS would have declared on another ally and we NG would be in the exact same position. That is not peace and not in the spirit of any treaty. You can not rightfully begin to humor that as a foul move on Non Grata's part. VE would have done the exact same in Non Grata's position.

    It is clear that IRON council were not on the same page at the beginning of this conflict and had/have no idea what they are doing. This is uncharacteristic of the Council.but they now have no choice but to follow through. Sure it makes them look bad but they don't have much of a choice now.

    Since IRON is incapable of fixing their error, there is no point in debating it. So shutup and fight; all of you.

×
×
  • Create New...