Thorgrum

How you been old friend? Winding down here Alfred, take care of yourself.

I have my own agenda but thanks, if there is additional foolishness to be had along the way Im all in. Its amusing dealing with people who have to study to be considered half wits.

What are you crying about now? Go back to IRC and throw a tantrum.

I'll pay 9 million if you appoint me "minister of shenanigans" Im a little buzzed so please check the spelling.

Yes, Its been a boon for me personally. That and the peace pipe

I remember you, I heard you were dead.

Clearly what we need is more people to step up. So in an effort to be more engaged with our world I would be happy to provide mediation services. I can assure all parties involved the utmost in discretion and professionalism if I become involved. You can trust me.

Are you tired? Be honest are you playing out the string collecting every 20 days and trying to remember to log in? The CN-Rangers are for you. No gimmicks here, we dont use forums we use alliance announcements to communicate and in game messaging. Liberty is paramount, when you become a ranger you manage your nation your way. Need help? You'll get help. Want to go to war? Go ahead war is an under utilized part of the game. Want to park, go ahead. Want to engage in game and become more active? We'll make it happen. No gimmicks, no B.S. here are the bullets of important information/Ranger rules 1. The alliance is currently at war, its likely not going to end soon. Will you be attacked if you come to the AA? I dont know, but war is necessary to prevent apathy and decay. 2. Fight whoever you want, when you want. However if you start an aggressive war you own the consequences. 3. If a war is declared against you? You will be supported with the resources the alliance can bring to bare. 4. Do you want your voice to matter? It will, I listen and any reasonable idea (say attacking an alliance 50X our size) will absolutely be "on the table" 5. Honesty gets you honesty, B.S. gets you B.S. Dont come to the AA to hide, you have an issue with an AA? Fine let me know, we'll make something happen. Send me an in game message and remember micro alliances are the "it thing" in 2015 CN. Last, and this is perhaps the most important thing. Remember Its not a lie, if you believe its true. Regards, Thorgrum Commanding officer of the CN-Rangers. Sua Sponte.

Matt is actually a pretty funny guy. Thats good stuff.

Yes below you thats why you keep replying, lol. The problem you have is rather simple william, its a measure of vestment. You are simply more vested than I am. As I explained to Matt you will never succeed in shaming me by any means, grammar? Common what is this 1993? Notably absent in your multiple replies to me, which you didnt understand apparently (lol) was a denial of the point made. You have some individuals lacking in Kashmir, you know this it cant be a new flash you read your forums. Me accurately pointing it out and you trying to scramble a rebuttal is a confirmation of my point. Why else would the head of an alliance continue to engage in this vein unless the other side was right? Lets see, shame the person? Nope that isnt going to happen. Obtain a mea culpa of some kind? Nope that isnt going to happen. Convince others you are right? That isnt going to happen when you continue to reply. Sorry william its simply not working. Look ive helped you out before, remember when I told you dont admit people to the alliance during war, you didnt listen and you were humiliated. So I'll help you again, you wont listen because, sadly you are not that smart but the quickest way to end something like this is to stop replying. 25 nukes says you and yours dont get it. *shrug* Its okay I know I am right again. Thanks for playing and have a great night! Oh and say hi to Margrave for me, lol.

Let me get on the record here before this gets to muddy. I understand sanctions as a tool of war, Ive advocated it for years and still do. Terming it a sanction on a rogue would be inaccurate because you dont have complete information. At a minimum what you have is one side of the story. As a senator its your right to do the sanction, you wont hear any crying from me about it but selling yourself short by making an absolute proclamation of the situation not only is a disservice to you but to those who voted for you.

I always look at the bright side. The scenario at present is a cant loose for me. Send me the documents, I'll sign it !

Methrage once again thank you for the support. It would be an honor for me if you were to take up the mantle and engage Kashmir in meaningful discussion. Nothing would give me more pleasure then for them to address you directly and engage, given their stance prior. I think it would be yet another great example of their consistent logic and overall stellar approach to illustrating their intellectual superiority. Again, thank you. :D

Odd you would reply then. One would conclude based on your accusation that you either dont understand what is being said (I can see that) or are trying to convince me that I cant post coherent sentences. The later would be inconsistent with what is it, your 17th reply to me in various threads? L2P William, youre going to have to troll better than that :smug:

If grammar is the best retort you can come up with Margrave then its absolute evidence that you should go back to IRC and pout in private channels. You have a stellar reputation for that, good luck to you and as I reminded you before, Im not going anywhere should be plenty of slots open should you want one.

I have a valid CB, and have created an alliance. Now people believe what they want, Im not going to argue on and on about what is and what is not a rogue but you or anyone else saying it over and over again does not make it accurate. Terms have been given, I am willing to negotiate I am benevolent after all. Besides they recruited me they made me apart of their alliance and I fulfilled what I was asked to do per my application. They broke the "contract" for lack of a better term. I did them a favor by leaving the forums as it was a circular conversation with closed minded bafoons (see margrave), to continue to embarass them with flawless logic wasnt in either of our long term interest. So I resolved it. At no time after my departure did I contact anyone to troll, argue or insult. I logged in fully prepared to defend the AA if needed, they kicked me which I dont dispute is there right but its certainly a valid reason to attack given the circumstances. This isnt 2008, our world has contracted, in a shrinking world the individual willing to act is empowered. The evidence speaks for itself, look at the attention one person generates.

lol

Matt dont throw in the towel just yet, its very early. Besides the only allusions of grandeur here are the ones you and yours conjured up. During my time at Kashmir, particularly at the recruitment I was very candid about how I viewed our planet and my standing in it. I make no claims to have something more than what my nation can bare, the fact this happened was a happy circumstance, as again I was asked some questions I gave honest answers and helped facilitate my desired outcome. Whether you believe that or not isnt important, what is important is my complete candor. Im not boasting any grand plan other than, for my unjust expulsion I will do what I can to affect as much damage as possible for as long as I can on kashmir. It really is that simple, that fact that you and what is it 3 other gov members are trying to win a war of sematics with, whats the latest? a narcissist is really the story. If in fact all I am is a rogue then your feeding the process to what end exactly? My embarassment? We both know thats not possible. But go ahead, keep putting margrave out there, lol.

Im replying to people who proclaim, what is it now? malignant narcissism? You should try reading things twice you did get the concept of replying to someone like this, over and over creates the conditions by which your credibility is suspect. Is this really the best you can do?

Well I think we can both agree you are not a word smith by any stretch of the imagination. My reputation, by my own admission is on par with those individuals? Thats a new one, not a bad way to go for you though but the logic is inherently flawed, along with your rhetorical conclusion. Their stake, like yours is much higher for "the entirety of planet bob" than mine. You are bantering with someone you've dismissed outright as a rogue, a malcontent, a nobody on and on... But you still address me and give me a platform so either my assertion of your alliances overall intellectual capacity is right, or you're lying. Now Im inclined to say its the later, as again for someone as inconsequential as me or who is a "laughing stock" you've certainly invested a great deal of time. Either way it doesnt matter, there is no possible way this vein of attack is going to work on me and you know it. I am not victimized by worry over what other people think. I know I am right (I usually am, as you well know) so its all rather moot. When do you want to let it dissipate and get on with the long term affect of your choice? Im more than willing to keep at it as long as you and your people are, I mean watching some of your people try and navigate multiple sentences on one theme is pretty humorous. You do have Jack Layton though, so +1 for you anyway.

Well william as they say "birds of a feather" Animalz, Methrage, Me, now this DOW and negotiation, I mean you really arent rising to the top here. Thats okay though, since you like the attention at least the rest of the planet gets to see what complete rube's you are. Send me an in game message if you need help with some of the words, I know its hard to follow for you.

lol, this is great.

No one has very high expectations of Margrave anyway, I mean you've been around you've likely heard it before. Rumor has it that on IRC he is somewhat of a ladies man, or well names that appear to be feminine in nature. Guess he can type one handed, amazing given anything beyond a paragraph from the guy and you're wondering about the education system and standardized testing. But we shouldnt pick on him to much, Margrave is notoriously thin skinned.

Valor thieving, thats actually not to bad. I'll give you a 4/10 for it +1 for being mad. You believe whatever you want margrave. I'll be around for a while im not going anywhere. Sua Sponte. ^_^

On the subject of mental midgets Im going to defer to your expertise on it. Its nothing to be ashamed of Margrave. Normally one has to go to a tractor pull or recycle center to have the caliber conversation you provide. In terms of what I consider myself? You couldnt possibly know that, which is of course a direct citation to you being a "mental midget" youre going to have to try much harder than that with me. I didnt manipulate anyone for the record. I was aware of a prior situation with these people, I admit that. I did read a great deal of data while on the Kashmir forums. This guy actually came to me asked a few questions, I answered them, he made a decision. *shrug* thats what happened, of course you'll believe whatever you want but my goals have remained consistent. Maximize the damage done to the Kashmir alliance for the unjust expulsion from the AA, this DOW helped facilitate that end.