sammykhalifa
-
Posts
619 -
Joined
-
Last visited
Content Type
Profiles
Forums
Blogs
Gallery
Posts posted by sammykhalifa
-
-
Hey,
Pigs and Cattle here if you don't have them, and you go black.
-
It just doesn't seem right to me that an alliance named Hydra only has one head.
-
Hey, it's you guys!
-
Which should be your goal. Besides, uranium is an attractive resource in most trade circles so with uranium, you would very likely find a trade circle without any major problems.
True, but it doesn't sound to me like he's in a trade circle. And he'd have plenty of time to get it when he gets to the point he needs it.
-
You probably want to think twice about Uranium for now. It's a good resources, but it's only really good whenever you get to the point you can buy nukes.
Wheat is important. The more population you have, the more taxes you earn and the more buildings you can make. Also, you'll want to pick up either a second population booster or one of the components of Construction (maybe marble).
Good luck.
-
Except that everyone who voted for "punish the group" also agrees with "treat the government as te alliance" which makes that a stronger viewpoint.
Logically, of course.
And I'm sure they also agree with punishing the son for the sins of the father.
I say go after the individual first, and if you can't work something out, then yadda yadda yadda.
-
Beer thread turning combative--his makes me sad.
-
Back when I started my nation, "." was allowed. I named my nation "Largeblackdot.". The period is no longer allowed, so in TE I'm normally "NoSpecialCharacters".
-
Are you kidding? Off the top of my head (and I stress the lack of effort that went into this brief retort):
East End:
Troegs:
Victory:
I could go on.
Okay, I will.
Stoudts
Weyerbacher
Straub
Yards
Sly Fox
Voodoo
Church Brew Works
North Country
Penn Brewing
Lancaster
Erie Brewing
. . . and, of course Pittsburgh Brewing. Home of Iron City, crappiest beer in the world.
-
Why didn't you just ask to be in this one?
-
Blue Moon is one of my favorites.
The main problem with Blue Moon is that there are several beers that it's directly worse than.
-
Beer fails )): Worst surrender term ever.
Yeah. 5,000 years of civilization has absolutely no idea what it's talking about.
EDIT: 5? More like 10-15.
-
Boddington's is delicious.
-
The people of Largeblackdot. congratulate you all on your one yeariversary. We're glad to have run across you guys when we did.
Good going.
-
Hey, congrats!
-
Who the heck is building that much infrastructure when you're big enough to make one of these things? And even if I were, if something were to make me actually want the crummy resources that make up asphalt I'd say the wonder is doing its job. The martian resource benefitting the 3BR is directly worse, and there's a reason.
Not to say that more balancing doesn't need done, but look at the moon resources and tell me how much of a bonus fish or wheat get. I think it should go further, but it's a start.
-
Nice Uranium.
-
NOOOOOOOOOOO!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
-
-
I think the new beer icon looks delicious.
-
I'm ambivalent about the new images; it will just take a bit of getting used to. I agree with the calls to update the uranium icon (I never could tell what it was) -- but please make it a dull grey disc or sphere: http://blogs.knoxnews.com/munger/uranium.jpg. There are probably more than a few people here who actually believe uranium glows green under normal lighting.
I was thinking maybe just an atom molecule.
EDIT: "Atom Molecule?" Me good at science.
Seriously, how big of an idiot is this guy?
-
Are you kidding me? Why would we need new icons? What a waste of time that could have been spent adding new features instead. Also, the new icons look worse than the old ones. They all look kind of "3D" now, which makes them more complex to the eye and therefore less "iconic", and harder/slower to recognize.
It's not because they're 3D, it's because you were so used to seeing the old ones. In time they'll blend right in.
Personally, I kind of liked seeing something a little different when I logged in this morning.
-
it may just be me (and probably is) but i would prefer the resources to be in their rawest forms. (ie not bullets representing lead)
but this is an improvement. thank you admin.
Maybe, but then you'd have black square, gray square, yellow square . . .
-
Actually, I quite like the fact that you can't quite calculate out the precise cash flow from this. That's what causes the rigid "best" strategies we see in improvement building, trades, and such.
Also, if all we're interested in is maximizing efficency, why aren't we all building furnaces or something instead?
Space race
in Open World RP
Posted
I don't know. It's no more or less resource "wasting" than blowing things up in a war, or hitting NS landmarks, or trying to get sanctioned in the first place, etc., etc. I mean, this [game] is still about fun, right? Some people still like building things.