Princess Doomee

I am the party with the RL issue and while I did not ask to have the meeting moved I do appreciate it being moved. I really didn't want to miss it.

But all the arguing is being done by people not involved.

[quote name='MitchellBade' timestamp='1326855727' post='2901925'] ZI and +2k tech, sorry but you gotta go a bit lower. Some of us have actually been fighting. [/quote] I'm working on it tough guy. Climb aboard and help me out. Who are you btw?

[quote name='CheeKy' timestamp='1326854867' post='2901910'] I hope you aren't talking about the first terms proposed. What I don't understand is the following: According to those logs Fark pretty much "agreed" to the initial terms offered(they thought the terms were lenient and acceptable), however as soon as FAN got involved they decided to change their views entirely and the terms weren't as acceptable anymore. Later on in the logs, Brehon asks FAN a question, redirects the answer to Fark and Fark decides to start bickering about the word "surrender" as well. Honestly, as far as I can tell, Fark is just trying to make NPO look like a fool. I don't even understand why Brehon decided to move the deadline towards Thursday. [/quote] I am talking about Brehon's terms. Not NPO's. Not that that post has anything to do with you.

[quote name='MitchellBade' timestamp='1326854694' post='2901907'] I'm game. Hit me up when you get down to my level. Better yet, I'll find you [/quote] I'm ZI, look me up.

Brehon, Brehon, Brehon, while as a spin doctor you don't hold a candle to Philosopher, I give you kudos. Nobody will read all that shiat and your monologs are outstanding. Bottom line is you are basing everything on a single word "acceptance". You know in damned well in your heart that we and FARK WERE going to sign off on YOUR terms. I have in my possession both the gun porn and the statement you requested and if anyone thinks for even a mili-second we would have spent the time we did on all that for no good reasons they are nothing short of fools. The only question I have which will never be answered was whether all your negotiations were just an NPO sponsored sham or if you did negotiate in earnest only to have your leader make you look the fool and believe me, after all those negotiations, to come back to us and say oops, Mary said I misunderstood her sorry I wasted your time. WOW! Thanks for posting all the walls of text so I didn't have to. Sadly, I have to say I was right all along. NPO has not changed a bit. Same egotistical arrogance with a few new names.

[quote name='Sir Paul' timestamp='1326259132' post='2897249'] Oh be nice, I recorded that on short notice with a throat infection. Besides, you try doing that without taking time to breathe. As for those who want to see my earlier work, here's my first sing-along war-report: [url=http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=pUh4kwtKdTU]Y5.T2.1a - My SDI: May 10, 2009[/url] [/quote] Oh no you don't! Fool me once, shame on you. Fool me twice, shame on me. Enough doo doo already.

[quote name='Cortath' timestamp='1326250225' post='2897164'] I am eating your babies. You think I care about human rights? [/quote] Eating my babies? What kind of silliness is that?

[quote name='Cortath' timestamp='1326249101' post='2897152'] I find it interesting to be spoken to about human rights from someone whose babies we are eating presently. [/quote] Would you translate that thought into something simple that I might understand?

[quote name='President S O' timestamp='1326170104' post='2896709'] If they don't surrender after this, they never will. [/quote] Its good to see someone is finally starting to get it. [img]http://www.farkistan.org/Smileys/farkistan/fark.png[/img] [img]http://fangamers.net/images/smilies/salute2.png[/img]

OK, let's get serious for a moment. While you might get passing grades on creativity, there can be no doubt that by forcing your membership to listen to that doodoodoodoodoodoo must violate some manner of human rights doctrine. Whoever did that background should have an immediate laryngectomy. Now, as to the purpose of your new theme song, do any of you really believe we were not aware of this outcome before the first shot was fired? If yes, you should write an autobiography and name it "Gullible's Travels". In closing, I beg you Sir Paul, if there is even one strain of humanity left in your body, please please please provide us with some better doodoo in your next effort. The ears of Planet Bob thank you.

As I said, I will not discuss it here.

I find it interesting that the people this thread is about (NoR)are acting so much more like mature gentlemen than a great many of the "onlookers". While we have obviously taken our separate paths, I do respect that about them.

[quote name='Schattenmann' timestamp='1325864851' post='2894117'] Ooh, tell me morrrrre. [/quote] The details of any discussions re: peace in our time will remain classified until such time as peace is achieved. At least that is our stance in this regard.

[quote name='Brehon' timestamp='1325855205' post='2894046'] BTW, on air Jack stated they were friends with NOR and always planned to have them in last war. In the end it came out NOR was invited but more importantly it was always planned. All of this speaks to the DH war. [/quote] Actually, we invited lots of others as well but they declined. [quote] A coalition war that has seen the other side XX basically hem and haw over white peace when it was offered by NPO to her front and then again to the XX front as a whole. Such a strange strange world when the pre-empters suffer the loss, get offered white peace and they basically go "Um... we are not sure". [/quote] Perhaps it is because your "white peace" had all sorts of conditions attached to it or it did last time anyone talked to us about it. And we didn't say "Um... we are not sure", we said no thank you. I have been sitting in #nsa for a few days now trying to get you guys together so we can at least decide on the shape of the table for the peace talks but you guys are busy busy busy so don't put it all on us.

[quote name='Cao Pai' timestamp='1325828266' post='2893808'] People are still trying to make sense out of what FAN does? You are all a bit slower than I previously thought.... [/quote] Finally a truly intelligent post. Bless you sir.

[quote name='supercoolyellow' timestamp='1325803970' post='2893541'] I'm sincerely just curious here, asside from Nor and Fark, who are these friends? [/quote] I was just kidding. FAN suffers from a severe case of Charlie Brown Syndrome as evidenced by this thread.

[quote name='Redneck' timestamp='1325798640' post='2893501'] Thats funny, pot calling kettle........ [/quote] Please direct me to where I resorted to name calling sir.

[quote name='mrwuss' timestamp='1325790952' post='2893434'] Awful smug to be such a cry baby. [/quote] Is that all you can do is name calling? Please come back when you graduate grade school and can make a worthwhile contribution.

[quote name='Striderwanabe' timestamp='1325788965' post='2893418'] It's funny how many people think this is a DoW thread. Best of luck FAN, are we still on for June 6? [/quote] Dag nab it!!!!! There goes the surprise!!!!!!!!!

[quote name='phillip110' timestamp='1325747396' post='2893192'] Not to mention, their gun pron has been terrible lately. (case in point, this announcement) [/quote] Instead of whining, why not be proactive and post some gun porn that you like? Regent of Omerta ...I am not too old to learn. Please teach me about firearms. I believe I have access to everything you'll need although regrettably we will be limited to 600 yards outdoors.

[quote name='Perceus' timestamp='1325735539' post='2893005'] well, then perhaps we were not being cautious of your treaties, but of your "friends" you know, you do have those right? like FARK and before NoR... just in case. [/quote] Yes, we do have friends.

[quote name='Sir Humphrey' timestamp='1325734584' post='2892988'] No offence, but is this one of those FAN scholars who could not work out how NATO got involved in the war, despite NATO having had a published MDP with NPO for the past 2 years? For the record, my initial dec did not request a treaty [i]list[/i] but an actual treaty. I figured FAN likes tough love [/quote] Scholar? Not at all although he does help us with our home brewing questions. As for treaties, we do NOT have any treaties. I really don't know why you people can't get that through your collective heads.

[quote name='Perceus' timestamp='1325733264' post='2892960'] oh thats because most of our nations are in the middle and upper tiers (30k and above) and well, you guys just stopped providing targets for us, trust me, ask around, our upper tier nations are bored 'cause they did damn too good of a job in bringing all our targets down to under 10k NS. If you have any of those 30, 40, 50, 60, 70, 80, 90K nations in peace mode, tell them to come out! our members will gladly dance with them. oh and its 26 active wars we did! ask Sir Humphrey, his reason for war in his first target was a question asking if we could have your treaty lists [/quote] I am happy to provide our complete list of treaties here:

[quote name='Perceus' timestamp='1325728187' post='2892893'] yup, "hundreds of nations under 10k, plus you know, the half a dozen that have been ZI'ed within the past two rounds of the war by NATO, and oh yeah, lets not forget that those "hundreds of nations under 10k" make up about...800k NS...oh wait, thats the nations you have out of peace mode, the rest are hiding away right? and you're right! it is quite fun to fight all those former 90k+ nations that are now under 30k and still manage to give them a beating. [/quote] Percius, one of our members was wondering why your mighty alliance has less than 16 nations fighting right now? 24 actual wars, and an engagement ratio of only 0.2 wars per war mode nation??