Jump to content

========

  • entries
    8
  • comments
    36
  • views
    9,019
 Share

9 Comments


Recommended Comments

thank you for the stats.

It seems Eq is losing more within the 100k-80k NS range. While Co is losing more at the 80-60k NS range.

At least at the 100k-80K ranges, Eq was abled to minimize the losses from 47 down to 23. But still lost more at those ranges.

One of the possibilities of Eq losing more nations consistently for 2 weeks at the 100k-80k NS range is DoW down by 100k-150k NS nations as well as C&G tactic of releasing only nations within those ranges.

While at the 100k-150k range is a technical tie, we know the tactic of Eq is to peace mode everyone within those ranges much like the tactic of C&G at the mid to lower tiers.

Link to comment

It's interesting that, through Eq is losing nations over 60k NS slightly faster than DH, DH is losing nations over 7k tech (specially at the 10k-15k range) almost twice faster than Eq.

Who said tech is harder to destroy than infra? :P

Link to comment

It's interesting that, through Eq is losing nations over 60k NS slightly faster than DH, DH is losing nations over 7k tech (specially at the 10k-15k range) almost twice faster than Eq.

Who said tech is harder to destroy than infra? :P

you are partially correct on that one. DH is losing more tech nations between 7k-15k

Link to comment

Well, I would have to say that one of the reasons for DH not losing as many nations over 60k is that tech has more ns value than infra. So, due to many of their nations being heavier in tech than Eq's side, it is taking longer to take them down in NS.

Link to comment

thank you for the stats.

It seems Eq is losing more within the 100k-80k NS range. While Co is losing more at the 80-60k NS range.

At least at the 100k-80K ranges, Eq was abled to minimize the losses from 47 down to 23. But still lost more at those ranges.

One of the possibilities of Eq losing more nations consistently for 2 weeks at the 100k-80k NS range is DoW down by 100k-150k NS nations as well as C&G tactic of releasing only nations within those ranges.

While at the 100k-150k range is a technical tie, we know the tactic of Eq is to peace mode everyone within those ranges much like the tactic of C&G at the mid to lower tiers.

With the amount of people spending billions on Infra to get back to 100k+, it's difficult to say who's losing what in that tier.

If you check the charts, 2/3 of TOP's nations out of peacemode in that NS range have rebought a lot of Infra at some point to get back up there & the other is keeping himself at 4k Infra so is only suffering NS lost on tech. I'm sure it's going on on our side too.

Link to comment

I'd rather lose 7% than 14% of my crew in that range.. any day.

PS, Umbrella is about to lose another in that range.. I and my squad have him by the ankles.

Well the totality is not the same if you based it per NS range. Your percentage is based on losses of all ranges rather than per tier. There is a percentage difference between the 150k-100k and 100k-60k NS ranges.

The tier by tier are more needed than totality since this will be the basis of decisions. Imagine if you based stats based on what you say and disregard the tier by tier stats, the plan for peace moding everyone at 100K NS and above for Eq will not push thru. Thus, making everyone at 100K and above at war mode because the totality stats says Eq is winning but losing on a certain tiers which result into massacre of the top tiers of Eq.

The same goes for Competence, wherein if they only based the stats top tiers, and disregard the mid tiers stats, their midtiers will be massacred since they will not peace mode those mid tiers.

Link to comment

With the amount of people spending billions on Infra to get back to 100k+, it's difficult to say who's losing what in that tier.

If you check the charts, 2/3 of TOP's nations out of peacemode in that NS range have rebought a lot of Infra at some point to get back up there & the other is keeping himself at 4k Infra so is only suffering NS lost on tech. I'm sure it's going on on our side too.

You are correct at the TOP front it will be difficult to say who will win at the top tiers if you consider just TOP, OTR and TSO.

I even expected Eq to win at that front decisively but Umbrella aka DBDC super nations interfered which probably change the course of top tier wars at that front.

Link to comment
Guest
Add a comment...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

×
×
  • Create New...