popsumpot

ADI surrendered to two alliances while on the badly loosing side - not bad. ADI forcing the surrender of two other alliances before having to go - exceptional. I'm going to assume your "wow" is directed at the 2nd sentiment.

[quote name='Dontasemebro' date='20 February 2010 - 04:25 PM' timestamp='1266647104' post='2193181'] oh, honoring optional treaties bad, gotcha. My bad. [/quote] Why? A large number of alliances entered this war on the SuperComplaints side using optional aggression. In fact, WAPA entered the war with an optional aggression clause.

What about Chocolate Rain? Would that help?

[quote name='Lamuella' date='19 February 2010 - 02:26 PM' timestamp='1266553573' post='2191386'] respect for UCN climbing considerably. [/quote] I don't want your respect! I just wanted your love!

[quote name='Biazt' date='19 February 2010 - 02:42 AM' timestamp='1266511347' post='2189763'] Aren't you the guys who had to call in UCN, LSF, ADI, and LSN? Poor NATO, they were only 3 times our size [/quote] Oh hey NATO! You guys are at war with 10 alliances, but you don't get to call in help, no sir! [quote name='ktarthan' date='19 February 2010 - 03:32 AM' timestamp='1266514366' post='2189836'] Aren't you the guys who are getting stomped on by PC and =LOST=? Just because we called in some friends doesn't mean that the war is going well for you. It also doesn't mean we were doing poorly - we just prefer a more decisive victory. When you size up an opponent, it is wise to size up their allies as well. [/quote] I'm not trying to say UCN is winning militarily. I think it's pretty obvious from the fact that we are fighting GOONS, PC and =LOST= that we wouldn't even be close. With that said, that doesn't mean we didn't do some damage either, and trying to pretend that you guys were the only one doing the hurting is willful ignorance.

It looks my previous low opinion of Stickmen is underserving. Good show guys, and thanks Wolfpack for looking out for your allies.

[quote name='Dochartaigh' date='18 February 2010 - 04:02 PM' timestamp='1266472949' post='2189024'] second, i never once stated that CnG should give TOP/IRON white peace. i tried to stick with conducting peace talks and attempted to never state white peace, as i certainly feel that TOP/IRON/TORN/DAWN should pay some sort of reps for their aggression. [/quote] Can I assume then that Polar will be too paying reps for their aggression? fake edit: I picked your post randomly out of the many in this thread that expressed the sentiment of "reps should be paid for aggression"

[quote name='ktarthan' date='18 February 2010 - 06:19 PM' timestamp='1266481164' post='2189354'] I'm sure they'll have just as much success as UCN. [/quote] Aren't you the guys that had to call in PC and =LOST=?

[quote name='Earogema' date='17 February 2010 - 12:00 PM' timestamp='1266372029' post='2186666'] Kinda like how you thought C&G was going to enter, huh? [/quote] So you think C&G wasn't going to enter the war when TOP & IRON entered on the SF front?

[quote name='magicninja' date='17 February 2010 - 11:10 AM' timestamp='1266369008' post='2186602'] I never got an answer to this. Please don't make your silence telling. [/quote] It's because C&G always was going to be in the war? It would have either been a defensive war from treaty obligations to their allies, or it would have been an offensive war for strategic reasons, but they would have been fighting sooner or later nonetheless.

[quote name='der_ko' date='17 February 2010 - 10:35 AM' timestamp='1266366958' post='2186545'] You are completely clueless if you honestly believe CnG, especially MK and GR, wanted this cluster$%&@ of a war to happen. Hint, if we were pleased by this war we wouldn't have spent countless hours trying to stop it. [/quote] I didn't know CnG was made up entirely of MK and GR.

[quote name='Mathias' date='16 February 2010 - 01:48 PM' timestamp='1266292085' post='2184305'] As if any of you have any room to talk about quick defense of your allies. How long did you let TPF burn before you mustered up the courage to contemplate defending them? [/quote] Actually, most of us wanted to go in that night. But then again, I suppose you were one of the people planning the war, and of course would know the information required to make you seem less like a fool.

[quote name='Lamuella' date='16 February 2010 - 03:57 PM' timestamp='1266299853' post='2184905'] not [i]that[/i] much of a beating. In the 5-6 days you've been at war with us, we've lost 220,000 NS or thereabouts whereas you lost 230,000 NS or thereabouts. Bearing in mind the fact that 1) we're smaller than you and 2) we were also in wars with LSF and NATO, that wasn't all that impressive. Nonetheless, I've had a lot of fun fighting you, and plan to have a lot more. [/quote] Tell me Lamuella, do you ever not check your nation for attacks? You're killing me man!

[quote name='Lamuella' date='16 February 2010 - 03:38 PM' timestamp='1266298686' post='2184828'] oh, I doubt it will take them that long. [/quote] You're right, I don't love you anymore