890765 Posted February 24, 2008 Report Share Posted February 24, 2008 Im new to CN and when I was looking through the current wars, many of the reasons for ware were "tech raid, pm for peace." What does this mean? can some1 help me out? thanks Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Count Rupert Posted February 24, 2008 Report Share Posted February 24, 2008 Basically it's where one nation attacks another for the purpose of capturing their tech. This is done mostly against nations who are inactive, hence the use of the term, tech raid, pm for peace. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
hahne59 Posted February 24, 2008 Report Share Posted February 24, 2008 Should you want to avoid devastating tech raids, it would make sense to join an alliance or to join the red trading sphere, where you gain protection from the New Pacific Order. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ShinigamiSama Posted February 24, 2008 Report Share Posted February 24, 2008 Count Rupert is correct. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
fant0m Posted February 24, 2008 Report Share Posted February 24, 2008 Should you want to avoid devastating tech raids, it would make sense to join an alliance or to join the red trading sphere, where you gain protection from the New Pacific Order. If an active tech raider is on the red team and is attacked himself in a tech raid does the NPO still defend him?? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
890765 Posted February 25, 2008 Author Report Share Posted February 25, 2008 thanks count rupert Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
KillerTomato Posted February 25, 2008 Report Share Posted February 25, 2008 If an active tech raider is on the red team and is attacked himself in a tech raid does the NPO still defend him?? I'm pretty sure the NPO defends unaligned red team members on a case by case basis. I would assume that if a nation got itself is trouble, the NPO would not be rushing to help them out. I can only assume though. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
hahne59 Posted February 25, 2008 Report Share Posted February 25, 2008 I'm pretty sure the NPO defends unaligned red team members on a case by case basis. I would assume that if a nation got itself is trouble, the NPO would not be rushing to help them out. I can only assume though. In fact it is a case by case basis. We hardly try to protect rogues on the red team from tech raids. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.