-
Posts
5,705 -
Joined
-
Last visited
Content Type
Profiles
Forums
Blogs
Gallery
Posts posted by Homura
-
-
[quote name='Saber' date='03 February 2010 - 03:59 PM' timestamp='1265212797' post='2156623']
There was coordination . At least in GW2 and GW3.
[/quote]
This is why Initiative won those wars. -
I've been playing CN for over three years too, but I think that's a sign that I might be a loser.
-
[quote name='Lord of Destruction' date='03 February 2010 - 04:20 AM' timestamp='1265170838' post='2154507']
Because I left the Order before the Karma war ended and I'm currently banned on their forums. Because Teeters left the Order before the Karma war ended and isn't very much liked by those who're high up in the Order, as far as I know. Because SeasonsOfLove is... well, SoL. And Necro is Necro. To claim we're an NPO 2.0 is to say that we've somehow made an improvement on what existed. That simply is impossible, my dear Katsumi.
Darkstar is an entity in and of itself that is completely unrelated to the Order in any shape or manner.
Aside from that, I'm pretty sure your question was sarcastic in nature. Either way, I hope I answered your question.
[/quote]
Sarcasm: one of the many services I offer. -
Your entire government is made up of former NPO members. How can we be sure that Darkstar really isn't the NPO in disguise?
-
Everyone has too many allies all over the place. What's wrong with you people?
-
[quote name='fant0m' date='02 February 2010 - 11:55 AM' timestamp='1265111714' post='2152976']
Nice to see you betraying GR and MK after they were attacked by an alliance with no CB whatsoever. Remember when Polar got rolled just because some alliances decided it was the best time to beat you guys down? MK and GR were there.
I seriously hope GOD rolls Polaris into dust. Maybe then you will retire and Polar can get a real leader again.
[/quote]
GOD isn't rolling Polaris into dust, they're pulling a few more alliances to do that rather than working to get NSO and NpO peace. -
[quote name='Louis Balfour' date='02 February 2010 - 06:18 AM' timestamp='1265091494' post='2152470']
What is this I don't even
Glad not to have a treaty obligation to this guy and his swollen head...
People of NpO, please... Take your alliance back.
[/quote]
And we all know what treaty obligations mean to the ODN, regardless. Stop complaining that they didn't bandwagon on C&G's behalf. -
I'm enjoying the marked change in opinions of Polaris from some people here.
This was an ... interesting move to say the least. But sometimes you have to roll the hard six, I suppose. -
Isn't Nordreich supposed to be black?
Also, WTF, WTF? -
To Vilien: That is so September 2007.
-
Ah, once again, Rebel Virginia is right about something. I don't know how many people are listening though.
And well, the claims of "TOP attacked us for no reason" are unsupported. There was no secret about which side C&G was going to end up on, it was just a matter of avoiding treaty web conflicts. Almost all alliances do this during major wars. -
[quote name='Sandwich Controversy' date='01 February 2010 - 03:34 AM' timestamp='1264995283' post='2149393']
Let's do this, TOP. GRL must break 100.
[/quote]
That would be even more fun if GRL was finally uncapped. -
[quote name='AirMe' date='01 February 2010 - 12:13 AM' timestamp='1264983206' post='2148682']
This would be funny if you weren't fighting 14k NS down when you started the fight. All this proves is you know how to beat up on someone smaller than you. You have also triple teamed him, all at least 14k NS above him when you started. Context ftw. Examining further, 2 of you are his only war and the 3rd guy is only in two wars. So all this says is "HEY LOOK AT ME, I CAN STEAL CANDY FROM A BABY."
[/quote]
Would be funny? No, it was funny. Hilarious, even. -
I edited this one sig from the NoCB War of the Coalition:
[img]http://img691.imageshack.us/img691/673/top1on7.jpg[/img]
It's strangely hilarious how the numbers can be reversed like that. -
[quote name='TimLee' date='31 January 2010 - 07:03 AM' timestamp='1264921429' post='2147009']
Remember when wars weren't so one sided.
[/quote]
Wars were always one sided. Even the Second Great War. Who actually expected the Flatliners to win? -
[quote name='Locke' date='31 January 2010 - 05:38 AM' timestamp='1264916282' post='2146786']
Yeah, I'm ready.
[/quote]
Haha very funny. But I actually have the SOS Brigade's largest warchest, which contrary to rumours floating about, was not spent entirely on fairy floss or anime figurines. -
Considering that your side is fighting for "community standards" it seems kind of strange to suddenly run straight over a number of standards that have been universally accepted.
Preemptive attacks have never been accepted, and in this case the situation is even worse because the attackers didn't even have a treaty to chain them into the war.
Trying to compare that to our declaration is laughable at best and empty rethoric.
@PrideAssassin: when you grow a brain give us a ring, aye?
Preemptive attacks have never been accepted? Then what is this:
http://forums.cybernations.net/index.php?showtopic=31270
I will never forget what utter scum Superfriends were in the NoCB War. Your time to die will come.
-
What I am saying is that I do not understand why are you !@#$%*ing at TSO for declaring on all of CnG when TOP and IRON and TORN already activated MDPs of CnG. TSO declaring on CnG does not activate any new treaties. In fact hitting Aircastle as some suggested would (if they have some uninvolved alliances).
I'm not stupid or dense to not understand declaring on 1 alliance is better than a bloc. But now that we already did that nothing changes if someone else declares on the same bloc. Treaties are already active.
Oh, and I love how even with this way of declaring outcome of the war is no where near certain. I'd wager there is even chance right now.
I don't care either way, but there are additional treaties could be activated that haven't so far. For example, Mushroom Kingdom alone could request assistance from Siberian Tiger Alliance and New Polar Order, ODN could request assistance from GATO, United Purple Nations, and the International, and so on. I can't say that this will actually happen, depending on how people are interpreting their ties, which is far more important than the actual wording of a treaty in every war.
I will say the true winners here are neutrals with radiation cleanup as a bonus resource, though.
-
This always ends well. Always.
-
Aren't you basically just inviting NpO to attack you by doing this? They have a grudge against you all, you know.
-
I love delendum's work.
-
I'm a little torn on this one. I like the idea of ODN and TOP fighting to the death. Part of me wants to see TOP win somehow for this, even if it means escalating the whole world into this conflict. But then again, I'd just like to have a spitball fight with Electron Sponge using 100 franco bills. (which admittedly aren't worth much these days, with the post-Karma War downturn in the Pacifican economy and all)
-
Although I'm an advocate of the Second Unjust War, the way this is shaping up, Nuclear Armageddon may be more appropriate.
-
Complaints and Grievances will probably be victorious, but not without huge losses. The real winner is a non-combatant nation such as my own.
Official Announcment from the Federation of Armed Nations
in Alliance Announcements (IC)
Posted
Decom factories? When did FAN become the New Pacific Order?