Jump to content

Galerion

Members
  • Posts

    483
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Posts posted by Galerion

  1. Manhattan project is expensive for first wonder you would need to be very patient.

    I think Federal Aid Commission (cheapest wonder) is best for first wonder but it depends on if you can get tech deals that use a 9mill rate instead of 6mill otherwise Stock Market is a good choice.

  2. 1 minute ago, 24 March 2021 said:

     

    So, you said I should continue my tech deals until I have 3999 infra? Am I wrong? Actually I don't plan to increase my infra until I collect enough money from tech deal. Is it sense?

     

    Yes at around that point you can switch to buying tech from others but you will need wonders before switching to buying, so you will probably need to stay at 3999 infra selling tech for a long time.

  3. 3 hours ago, 24 March 2021 said:

    just tiny question to be sure:

     

    does technology decrease infrastructure maintaining cost? right?

     

    Technology lowers infrastructure upkeep costs up to a maximum 10% discount based on the following formula: (Technology Level * 2) / Nation Strength = Percent off infrastructure upkeep bill.

  4. 9 minutes ago, Caladin said:

    It's worth mentioning Bushwhacker that SNX is basically the worst choice of alliance you can make; they are highly incompetent, in economics, in warfare, in foreign affairs.

     

    Take a look at any of the top ten or so alliances, literally any of them will be a better choice than SNX, though some of them may be a bit harder with you on your application due to the wars you launched, but they will likely forgive them - and the reason they will be harder is that, unlike SNX, they have the luxury of not being desperate.

     

    Was it really necessary to stroll in here and bait like this, for you to believe all of what you've said you must be very ill-informed.

  5. 54 minutes ago, the rebel said:

     

    I suppose it depends on what people think is a decent amount as its very subjective.

     

    I'd put the starting point of getting a decent amount from just taxes at the 5k infra jump with a good trade circle and economic wonder stack.

     

    I'd agree with that and wouldn't recommend anyone start giving away tech before that.

  6. On 30/07/2016 at 2:49 AM, Bushwhacker said:

    OK, would you be interested in such a trade?

     

    Sorry no I don't buy tech, I do arrange for tech deals to take place but it works differently to the above and requires that those people be in a allied alliance or on brown team.

     

    Start a thread in the Black Market for 6/100 deal and I'm sure you'll get some people who are interested.

  7. There are a few variation around to get better efficiency out of the mechanics but the most common deal for a new player like you would be for a person to send you 6 mill and in 10 days time you send them 100 tech back.

  8. You can use the deployed troops to attack with while any you have not deployed defend, you will lose some of your deployed troops in attacks but then you can buy more which will add to your defending troops.

  9. 8 minutes ago, Lord Hitchcock said:

     

     

    Anti, as in defensive. And we did get grief, and later annoyed to find out that our historical enemies  (NAP or no NAP) were still working on their own.

     

    Then you should have just used bloc, anti can easily be construed as you putting yourself against the other parties right from the start.

  10. 9 minutes ago, Lord Hitchcock said:

    which was annoying as we caught grief of forming our own bloc for protection, it annoyed us- and we took proactive action.

     

    You got grief because you advertised it as a anti-bloc implying hostility towards the alliances you mention in that thread.

  11. 3 minutes ago, Lord Hitchcock said:

     

    They were denied after. As confirmed from an old friend.

     

     

    Saturday 09:21: BMTH: What happens if they were to join a bloc? Tonight? I’m all for not letting them join, but I may be out voted. 

    Never mind, I had them rejected

     

     

    Since when was BMTH a reliable source of information he's a spuddler like you.

  12. 26 minutes ago, Jack Layton said:

     

    For posterity here, Junka noted to me in private on IRC that he advised SCOTLAND to NOT join any potential bloc with VG, POSSE, or any other considered alliance on the basis that he perceived us to be prone to war (fair enough). Ironically, this bloc was discussed as means of defending against potential MInc aggression which proved to be a reasonable concern, given the demand that SCOTLAND disband for even entertaining this notion. While it might have been reasonable for MInc to be concerned about the potential of a bloc forming against them given our history of hostilities (particularly before the improvement in our relations), demanding that SCOTLAND disband was unreasonable. Particularly since they aren't exactly a military threat. I'm glad the matter was resolved diplomatically, though I find it funny that Junka/SNX are the ones taking the flak for this when they're the ones who told SCOTLAND not to join with us which is precisely what MInc wanted.

     

    Here we go

    3c462566b9cd3a770e5f41a420fde261.png

  13. 3 minutes ago, Lord Hitchcock said:

    Monsters Inc has always shared a nuetral feelings towards VG, minus a couple post war heckles, for good fun.

     

    This does concern me, however, VG attempting to sign an NAP so that Junka has no accountability for his aggressiveness towards m inc and our friends?

     

     

     

    Please back up your claims of Junka/SNX acting aggressively, just saying it doesn't make it true.

×
×
  • Create New...