Daenerys Targaryen
-
Posts
1,526 -
Joined
-
Last visited
Content Type
Profiles
Forums
Blogs
Gallery
Posts posted by Daenerys Targaryen
-
-
Again with your lies, lies , lies, BS, BS!
I hit 2 nations under me and one nation my size...I'm also fighting Fata1 who is basically my size.
That's 4 and you are damn close to my size, that's 5....you have 2 wars close to your size. You are the one that's a coward! Not to mention your late to the party!
You talk of begging for help, lol your a hypocrite! There is no way you would have attacked me with out Fata1, no way at all! I know you and him have been talking, and you both set this up! I also know fata1 went begging for help from other alliances No worries though.....all I see is that Fata1 came to negotiate terms for war and then does these actions, I think the terms might have to change.
Hey I can do that too!
You have just conducted a spy operation against the nation of Dragonstone. In the attack your spy efforts were successful as your spies were able to target and destroy 1 enemy nuclear missile. Although the mission was a success your spies were caught, 20 spies were killed, and your identity has been publicly revealed.
Just what I said I would do, and you got 2 of those! You will get more, and yes you will have your slots full as well Now ain't that sweet! ;)
Like I always said, she is a hypocrite and biased! Everything is all good for her side all is ok as long as they do it! I'm thinking she might just be roughing though, we should find that out for sure, maybe get Fata1's opinion on this. I mean he discussed a completely different standard last night before update.
BGYou made 3 down declares so stop with the lies already. One hasn't attacked back and the others are all getting rolled to the point where they're losing everything they throw at you.
I don't care about these limited nuke rules you made with D1, no one is going to stop me from using mine on you. I don't speak for D1 but you started using nukes first so how can there be any rules? You just want to use nukes on those who you're having a hard time with while you expect D1/WD's to stand back and watch. Watching them for many rounds now, I don't expect they let you get away with this BS.
You didn't want a fair fight and on top you decided to use nukes just so they can't fight back, but I'll bring you a real fight. Not even filling my defensive slots is going to save your nation from burning. You sound like you've already lost the war and you're now reliant on others to come to your rescue. You're only really going to be fighting me and Fatal, all of his 5 opponents have more NS and you're scared that I'm fighting alongside one decent sized nation, you're a joke!
You think i care about the spied nukes? I don't need nukes to stick a sock in your mouth.
-
I did try to declare on you first. :P Well 2nd right after BS talker.
-
Hey, look. DT is doing exactly what she crucified AoW for last round. Am I surprised? Hell, is anyone surprised?
I can't promise you that we will hold back our nukes on you. I feel you've made yourself exception to our rule.Using nukes on non-nuclear nations means no one has to play fair with TDO, let alone the massive down declares and do you really think I'm not going to use my nukes? Do you really think i want a no nuke rule?
-
SW, I don't personally know what kind of an alliance WD was or has become. The current leader BE use to be a good friend of mine back in the day, but since I returned 3 rounds ago I have messaged him a few times and he did not respond back. I obviously have no idea why as back then I was a protectorate of his alliance and we war'd together several times. Anyway I can say that I do know that since this war started several of your members have sent "nasty messages" to my guys. I will also say that at the start of this war, any leadership could have come to me or Caz and asked our stance on the use of our nukes.....That didn't happen. Instead, the very first things that did happen "was" what we "did" put into our DoW. That being no dirty spy ops. Several nations had it done and at the same time several nations had some nukes spied and some nations had failed attempts. I can definitely understand the spying of nukes not knowing if they would be used or not. So again I say it was the leadership of WD that should have got a definitive answer to our intentions regarding their use. I have stated that I personally was on the fence about using them at all, and I even post in our announcements section to refrain from using them unless that piticular nation was over whelmed with war and/or targets or if a nation had ops used on them that were dirty or messed with their nukes. I would be more than happy to send a copy of this to you or anyone that would like to see it.
Now, since you state your beliefs on how you would have done things and your stance on everything when you were leading, I must also say that I do find that hard to believe. For one, you tried to get my hands smacked by reporting me for something that was a reciprocation of what was posted to me, about me from DT. Yet you did not report DT for that which was actually what was the act that you tried to report me for. This tells me if anything you are biased and vengeful. Now after that, I could have tattletale on DT and more that likely actually had something happen to her as she did indeed commit that violation. But I did not. As much as I do not like DT, I don't believe in those actions and she was not the one who did it. Yes I have seen her do it to other people before but it was not me. The other thing I will point out is that WD joined a bloc to take out TA and in doing so went against ALL the standard rules WE as the TE community set in place to be fair and honorable. Hitting early, dirty spy ops, standard 10 day rest time to recoup. Clearly this was an attempt to take out Avengers for the whole round, especially how heated DT got knowing that the plans of hitting them again after TPC was stopped by us. So your going to have to forgive me if I find that what you say is maybe not so much as a lie but more professed. Personally I think this has ruined the round, and needs to stop....but let me ask you this, would you have agreed to this "bloc" and spying against TA? If so would you agreed to the attacks with out letting them get their standard 10 day rebuild time?
In order to shorten this response, please read my reply to DD....
This is exactly the feed back many TDO is giving DD, and I have to agree makes complete sense. I mean all of these nations could have used that wonder slot to buy an Econ boosting wonder on top of that 12-15 mil it cost to buy the MP's and nukes. The other thing is after the war that Econ wonder would really help in the rebuild of our nations. I'd also like to point out that these nations we are fighting have advantages like numbers and a shiat load of XP plus I'm pretty sure many nations would of and still will buy MP and nukes to use on us tomorrow or the next day.
TDO is not in the business to crush alliances, or even beat them down. If fact several nations have already sent peace to people we find have no way to fight back, or have no cash to rebuild with.
TDO will give peace to any nation that wants it as long as they agree to that peace and not jump back in.
We are also open to an early end date of this war if this is what the leaders of WD and D1 want.
All we want and ask for is that all this BS stop, stop with the blocs, stop the dirty spy ops go back to the standard rules of the game we all seemed (or majority) agree on. It is our responsibility as the leaders of these alliances to keep this game fun fair as possible. To maintain a certain dignity, honor and morals when playing this game.
Winning is not everything, especially not at the cost it's being done.
We can all stand and point fingers at each other, but there is nothing getting done to stop the dwindling numbers in TE. Sadly, the people who cry the loudest are the ones doing nothing to stop it, only hurting it.
DT, you don't have a "dog in this race" as you once said, and it's really none of your concern. Your biased opinions are not making a difference other than to make things worse. It is your comments on here that have push our guys to want to unload their nukes. I mean if your going to be chastised for actions that have not even happened then why the hell not! Now you say it "looks like" we are using nukes on nations that will struggle to rebuild, how the hell do you know? That's the same thing as saying "I'm guessing" or "I'm not sure" and you really have no clue.
You call me a coward, your the one who didn't build four 2 rounds cause you knew running your mouth would get you a beat down.
I told you I hit the targets I was assigned, I also hit one guy not assigned that was equal to me. I even tried to hit other people cause I thought we had 4 slots, not thinking that's only with a pentagon. It cost me 4 lost ground attacks because I full deployed then tried to DoW then only to be told my slots were full. That left me with minimal troops to defend and thus when I got hit exactly at n12:00 am I lost all 4. Stupid mistake, but lack of sleep mixed with long hours at work have a tendency to do that.
Your the one who is a coward, not me! I don't turtle like I've heard about you. And I've never heard of you attacking anyone that would give you a fight.
I'm lucky? No you are the one that is lucky, I would take your nukes and have you crushed by end war. Don't worry though, I'm sure you will get your chance to showcase your most excellent fighting skills down the road and show me how tough you are.
STFU already pet
BGTalking BS is over now! Time to put all those threats into action now. Check your war screens and re-buy your soldiers.
This is cute.
o: Daenerys Targaryen From: BurningGlory Date: 5/2/2015 4:54:53 PM
Subject: RE: War Declared!Message: Sweet, the brave DT takes action :)
This of course just shows your cowardness, you have 2 wars I have 5. Just admit you can't take me on with even war numbers, it's ok to admit it just don't try to act like your some war God!
BGYou declared 3 down declares on nations with no nukes and you used them, all of your opponents are weaker in NS including my own nation. I made 2 up-declares and both have nukes but keep talking BS, that is all your good at. Look who walks the walk and not just talks now. Quickly now go beg for help from your other friends! -
Actually I did type that on my phone while having a cheeky look at work. So the actual thing was a typo. All you really have to do is miss a letter out and it changes The word to something suitable. But yeah I have friends on either side who I want to fight and see do well. Although there is always a slight exception to the rule.
Or miss out 2 letters.
Well said Samwise. You are truly "wise".
But I do think you guys are forgetting something and that is the fact that the TDO nations that did buy the MP and now have nukes could have used that 10 million to be a lot bigger now and collecting way more cash.
They stumped their own growth just to have those nukes just to now be asked to leave them sit rusting in their silos. That is a tough call for any alliance leader to make. Trust me as I have been there and it didn't work out well requesting such.
At this point I would just hope that the TDO guys use discretion on when and who they use those nukes on.
The way I see it TDO would be having this discussion with just about any alliance they hit since they have the nuclear advantage over all.
The guys leading TDO this round seem like a pretty good crew and I just can't see them nuking you guys over and over again until your round is all but over for some of you. Tbh I could see them not nuking those who simply cannot afford to be so and let it be known to them that nukes will most likely finish their round.
If the nuke advantage is that much of a hurdle and will indeed all but finish either alliances round then just ask the guys at TDO for an early peace to this war and be done with it.
I am all but positive that they would be agreeable to do so as none of them strike me as the "end all" type.
Just my 2 cents on the matter is all.
Carry on and good luck to both sides and as a side note Cowboy and Fata1ity were both very understanding to the early end of our war with them.
I hope you guys at TDO will be the same if they need to end this war with you.
Kind of like the old "whats goes around, comes around" saying here for them then if it indeed does happen. Seems fitting.
I find it desperate and laughable to justify their use of nukes because they spent 10 mill there and not anywhere else, this has to be a first but I'll happily expose your blatant bias. Have you actually taken a look at TDO's offensive wars, almost all of them are down declares.
It looks like they're using nukes on those who will struggle to rebuild. If your opponents don't have them then you should have stated you wouldn't use them in the DoW if you're not going to use them or any agreement between their govs, until then anything goes, including spying nukes, it only sounds like an excuse to use them on fronts where you're struggling. We all know TDO want to use them as much as possible but don't want all of your large and broke nations to take any hits, but its a dirty and cowardly act and it wont be forgotten in a hurry, I can assure you that.
TDO have shown their true colors and we all know they're doing this not only to wage a soft war in the hopes they take minimal damages, but also for their friends in Avengers.
Also this coward BG not only makes massive down declares, he starts to nuke these non-nuclear nations as well. This is the person calling everyone else out for down declares but he goes a step further and nukes them too.
You're lucky I'm not in D1 and i was suppose to be there.
-
I was including the obvious typo in my comment. It still doesn't mean that he's holding a grudge. Everyone has those people they want to fight just because they know it will be a good fight. It doesn't mean there is some ominous grudge in the background.
My first interpretation of it was what i said it was so you can't say it can't be.
-
Sorry, but no part of that says there is a grudge. There are people in most AAs (my own included) that I'd love to fight just to try and crush them and have a good fight. It doesn't mean I have a grudge against them.
You're right, I didn't translate "finds" to mean friends.
I have
findsfriends and people I want to crush on both sidesThat makes complete sense now.
-
I don't hold grudges its why I don't attack you on every forum post you make. Just food for thought.
Expressing your opining or debating does not mean you hold a grudge against that person. If this was the case then I'd have grudges against even people I'm friends with. If you have something to say on these forums then expect a counter argument from those who disagree, this does not mean they have a grudge against you. This is not an unusual practice on the OWF, its pretty much all they do in the SE forums.
But i should also clarify why I stated that you shouldn't hold grudges,.
'Let's be honest one side will win eventually and it doesn't bother me which side it is I have finds and people I want to crush on both sides. I'm just going to sit back war when we war and watch it all unfold.'
Here is the definition of grudge: a persistent feeling of ill will or resentment resulting from a past insult or injury. Need i say more?
-
Can i just attack someone? Anybody will do.... Any offers?
I've already been turned down cold on a 1v1 offer, I believe the excuse for the decline is that this person would destroy me. :D Oh yeah, we'll can we at at least find out? I guess this coward doesn't want too.
-
Let's be honest one side will win eventually and it doesn't bother me which side it is I have finds and people I want to crush on both sides. I'm just going to sit back war when we war and watch it all unfold.
I keep getting told its not good to hold grudges.
-
I'm not justifying anything I am just weighing in andwill most likely do so again. I don't care which side I weigh in on because at the end of the day it's something that my alliance does not want to associate with.
You seem to be the only person that thinks anyone is associating Citadel with anything.
The reality is someone has to challenge these ridiculously powerful alliances and unfortunately it may require some of us to combine our strengths to try and match their own. This is what TE is and has always been about, and that's keeping wars as fair as possible even if that means combining stats. Of course no one is surprised that Citadel are on the side line, no one has ruffled your feathers and it seems you're capitalizing on the situation but i know people still respect Citadel for at least not supporting and strengthening them anymore. And when i say "them" i means those who want to dominate everything and everyone that get in their path while never having to fight a war where they don't have all of the major advantages, both of whom are new alliances.
-
Well can't say I didn't see it coming. But I'm just going to wade in a little bit here. Just a reminder wd and D1 have had longer to rest then anyone else that has warred. Just stating a fact before you go off on one dt, just don't start it.
That is indeed a fact and I will tell you a fact of my own. Citadel, OP and Misfits have not warred at all so lets not try to justify this down declare because D1 and WD's have had a longer rest than the others that have warred. What is that like 3 other alliances, 2 of whom peaced out yesterday? If you didn't want me to start, you really shouldn't have started.
You might even be wrong on this fact of yours since RE and NM were at war first.
-
Remember this post DT? Yet another post that you lie in and show your biased BS.
Everyone please use the next post by this POS player to demonstrate her unyeilding hatred for those she hates.
Oh, here we are....this is the scorned baby girl I know so well! Go a head and let your biased BS flow out that trap of a diarrhea mouth.
It seems if your side does it, then there is every excuse in the book why it's justified. "Oh TA had it coming", "oh they are new". Truth is your nothing but a freaking hater that is biased against anyone you think backs TA. Did you ever stop to look at the stats (yes you can get your own, it's very easy, but we will post them soon)?
Did you ever think that maybe we had no intentions of using our nukes? No, you didn't you just assume and give us our path before we even walk it. I'm am so sick and tired of you and your BS!
BTW, who did you want us to hit? I'm curious, point out your fair fight!
First off, we are no ones lap dog. We hit who we want, period!
Second, is that a threat DT? Please answer that before I fill up my war slots!
And yes we have friends that we don't want to war with....I mean, I don't see misfits jumping on D1!
We don't need your approval, and I don't care to have it if you did approve!
Before you go running off the mouth, check with your co leader, I messaged him about war.
And lastly, I remember last round when D1 hit avengers with WD and D1 jumped on the nuke wagon thinking they would hit TA with nukes as at the time TA didn't have even MP or SDI's. It just so happened that DD and a few others were out of town and had not used their wonder slot and managed to get their own MP's and nukes.
I guess that would have been fair had TA not been able to use their? Never mind don't answer, you will just come up with another biased excuse.
BGLets not try and make comparisons with the AW/NDO war and this BS. They're moslty newbies, most of TDO have many well known veterans of CN, in fact many are known Spartans from SE.
It was both AW/NDO's first war, neither alliance started with nukes, I'm aware one nation from AW's used 2 nukes which was upsetting to see and i did consider evening those odds myself. The numbers were exaggerated by the likes of yourself because some of AWs' members weren't even 5 days old so they couldn't war, you tired to make out that didn't matter because they will eventually enter as if a 5 day old nation will make a big difference. NDO are the veteran alliance so they should have been more prepared and RoadRash stated this. AW are made up of very inexperienced players and because of this they made a mistake but one they knew they would learn from, their leader said they wanted to first test and gauge their abilities and i have nothing against those who don't overestimate their strength like so many have. Now that they know how well they can perform, you may see some even match ups from them. You on the other hand, never gave them a chance and instantly scorned them for it. You're true intentions for abusing them is because you assumed they're with D1 and are doing their bidding which only showed your bias towards D1. I know D1 ignore you and they rolled your friends, why wouldn't you be mad. I went into that thread and wished both warring parties good luck and it didn't take you long and ethat was used against me for not giving a new alliance and players a reason why they shouldn't play TE but you made an efforts to do that very thing. Everyone deserves a chance, and i said nothing to Avengers for the entire 33rd round, i watched on the sideline while they continued to do what i oppose them for now. They were in fact given an entire round of chances before i started to oppose them but you wanted AW to get none.
Why would Misfits jump D1? They're still trying to recover from their last war, it'd have been a down declare but obviously not as extreme as your own.
We will first try to target alliances that hadn't yet warred, friendly or not, we're playing TE not SE. TDO would obviously be at the top of the list since you're the strongest alliance, no bias involved, that is how we operate by attacking the next strongest up or straight across no matter who they are. Our friends will remain friends off the battlefield, but on the battlefield, we are enemies and we hope our friends see it the same.
Obtaining the stats wasn't possible so we were reliant on TDO to combine some of us, Misftis/ Citadel or OP/Citadel would have been the only fair fight regardless of your nuke advantage, its not your fault we hadn't started stockpiling nukes earlier and we would have to just bite the bullet. Of course there was chance you wouldn't use them and we'd have walked away without a high possibility of life long vendettas.
We won't go out of our way and move mountains to guarantee we can completely dominate everyone else without a fight, we are not the Avengers. Misfits plays to war and Misfits have a solid history of doing their best to make offensive wars as fair as possible as do many other alliances.
If you want to declare war on me, you're more than welcome too? I was expecting us to fight anyway and i was looking forward to it. Come at me and i will promise you, no other Misfit will get involved. Get your other opponents to peace out and lets have a 1v1? All 3 of your opponents are less than half your size and none have MP's and you like to go around calling out everyone else for down declares. You should take a look in the mirror. I seriously can't stand your type.
Put your money where your mouth is sunshine! To even the contest, I'd still be a down declare for you. Lets settle this! Give the word and I'll declare, I'll message the others to peace out.
How many times have I seen alliances post NS for stats in war, now you say it has nothing to do with it?
Are you freaking serious? Really? Please read what you just posted! That is the most contradicting biased BS you have ever posted! Let me say it for you, it seems that this the only way you will pick up on this ridicules statement you made;
Oh, whine/cry this is about eliminating 2 alliances that might try to beat down The Avengers (yet again) after their war with TPC. That way you guys might actually get a chance to build enough to defend yourself against the next onslaught of attackers.
The terrible TDO, picked the softest war they could, why they don't even have MP's. Plus they are broke and recovering from the last war. Omg how can anyone agree to this, TDO is so terrible.
Now let me point out your biased BS. Notice how you said we hit "2" alliances that might roll TA after their war with TPC? Yeah that! So it's ok for D1 and WD to hit TA with far far more time to recover than they would have let TA do after this TPC war, right? Then it was mighty fine for WD and D1 to not only roll NM (a new alliance, that you so called love to see) but to curb stomp TA too. Only to have TPC roll in not even 7 days of rest for them. Wait now let's get to the real problem that you have, we hit "2" AA's that you say we're going to hit TA yet again? Really?
Well let me tell you they are not as broke as you think, and they have had way more time to build than TA did before they were attacked by TPC.
So STFU With that BS!Bla bla and more blas. Keep trying princess!
This play was obviously taken straight out of the Avengers play book. We all know most of you have low war chest levels which is why you needed a soft war. You're really just a bunch of noobs trying to be elite. Now that everyone knows how TDO operate, basically another Avengers, don't complain when others do the same back.
-
Their first move as an alliance, what a joke.
I echo what Tim said, and I'm not quite sure how an alliance with triple our NS is a "lap dog" either.
NS has nothing to do with it.
Its about eliminating 2 alliances that may have warred you again after your war with TPC so you get more time to recover and try to regain your dominant position.
TDO not only picked a soft war but opponents with 0 MP's that are still broke and recovering from their last war. They will mostly come out without a scratch on them.
And now I bet you're hoping Citadel/Misfits/OP fight it out and cripple each other?
Stats:
TDO
Members: 30
NS: 355,058
Avg NS: 11,835
WD/D1
Members: 49
NS: 459,684
Avg. NS: 9,381
None of those stats mean anything.
These are the stats that matter:
Stats:
TDO
Nukes : 47
+20k NS: 6
+15-20k NS: 6
+10-15k NS: 7
+5-10k NS:12
WD/D1
Nukes : 0
+20k NS: 0
+15-20k NS: 4
+10-15k NS: 15
+5-10k NS: 23
-
Srs? Please stop trying to remove TDO's self-autonomy - yes we have been friendly in the past (and do still occasionally chat now), no neither of us can dictate the others moves.
In any case TDO have attacked the weakest alliances to avoid stronger alliances.
-
We know what this is all about, and we know TDO are your lap dogs. If you's want to play this game then so be it.
-
This is probably one of the biggest down declares I've ever seen, its really a mass raid.
So basically if you're friendly with TDO, they won't ever hit you so is that like everyone else except D1 and WD's? This war is BS and you all know it is. This won't even be counted as a real war so enjoy the XP raid.
-
There is quite a difference between trying to make a war appear fair than wars actually being fair. People rarely, if ever, attack when they do not have a skill or statistical advantage. As to your other point, I won't argue with you. Several of us have admitted being wrong about something or apologizing for a past action in the past; you do not admit being wrong or having a bias even when it is clear to third parties. There is no point in arguing with someone whose conclusions were made hundreds of days ago.
Were these official apologies from Avengers? I've never seen any apologies but i have seen Avengers constantly defend ALL of their actions.
All i see come from your camp is every desperate attempt imaginable to undermine me for speaking the truth. If you had spent more time apologizing and making efforts not to make those same mistakes again, you wouldn't get a word from me, in fact I'd have been one of your biggest supporters and told the complainers to lift their game if they were solely rolled from an alliance that built and warred better.
-
I don't know where you're getting this bias from. You're pulling the same crap as OP/WD's did with constant down declares while avoiding stronger alliances, combining strong alliances with weaker/newbie alliances to make numbers look even, alliance hoping when wars look too tough, etc.
DD and WH know all about it and they both also made many complaints about it, and now they're the ones using the very same tactics they were once upon a time against those using it.
"TE isn't about fairness" Obviously for Avengers it isn't. Most alliances do make efforts to keep wars as fair as possible, clearly Avengers are not one of them.
-
If you 're so interested, i found the only threads you should be looking at.
http://forums.cybernations.net/index.php?/topic/123919-avengers-announcement/
http://forums.cybernations.net/index.php?/topic/124067-an-ordo-paradoxia-announcement/
-
I looked through old threads as well, can't find anything that says we had more than 1 MP, but can't find anything for us having 1 MP only as well. The facts stated there are that OP had 80 nukes, while Avengers had 3-4 nukes. I find the 5 MP situation really unlikely personally because that means that at least two people would've had 0 nukes, and if, as you say, we knew OP was coming, I would expect to see nuke build up from the nations with MPs, meaning that they would probably have had 16-20 nukes when OP hit them, but instead, they had 3-4, which for me would be much more likely from 1 MP. This is all assumptions on my behalf as A) I was in NDO at the time having certain Pokemon problems and B) I never checked the Avengers wonder screen while I was there.
Now, what I really want to see is evidence of TPC being IRSed spied from Days 3-7 :)
Its not surprising that most of us with MP's didn't instantly start building nukes right out of war when we're still in NA and under 2k infra/200 tech.
Also just because we knew OP was coming, doesn't mean we'd build up, increasing our stats to give them more of a justification for hitting us early, let alone inflating bills. When i say we knew OP would come, none of us knew exactly when. Maybe if we knew it would be 3 days after our previous war, all of us with MPs would have started building nukes asap but we didn't know that for certain. That has to be one of the shortest rebuild time allowed after a nuclear war? We still had nations in NA.
Anyway, i can see you all want me to be wrong but assuming and making wild guesses about those events is almost as bad as accusing people of spy ops without any evidence.
Why don't you ask TPC if they were spied, and who the hell would have those messages saved this long? I guess since you probably wont get any evidence, its all lies and if you really think that then so be it, no one in TPC cares what you think.
-
It would certainly make things easier tbh.
For you's not me and i wanted to see what Stevie had, I was looking forward to seeing some logs or whatever it was he was going to prove me wrong with. Most of the Avengers who were there when i was should already know this anyway.
-
Neither do you :)
I never said i did but for most of it i could, if i could be bothered too. I could just go back to these threads and I'm sure I'd find everything there but will I when i know I'm not wrong?
-
Nope, and there will never be such a round. When I led a long time ago, I actively tried to have some sense of morality and implored people to adopt it, even tried to impose it at times.
Then I grew up. I realized that in this world Might is Right. This truth will set us free.
Almost every war is a down declare, we all know this but they shouldn't be massive down declares to avoid stronger alliances unless of course the one that gets hit does it to others which if i remember right, last round, Avengers bypassed D1 and WD's (both of whom were stronger in stats than TPC) to hit TPC with almost double the ANS and NS.
You are so horrendously wrong!
When OP came calling, AFTER that war, we had 1MP and 3 nukes. How the hell did we go MP and nuke up WD? The fact that OP came at us with like 90 nukes to our 3 was why we got 5 nations from D1 to help us. It was during this war that we all put up our MPs.
How about you present some facts instead of just trotting out a whole pile of !@#$?
Again, 100% wrong.
I bought a MP for WD's and i know many others did too so quit with the BS you're trying to present as fact. The reason why we had a low nuke count was because we had just used them all on WD's and we didn't start rebuying them until OP hit us which was 3 days after we reached peace with WD's. We fought WD's with one MP, what a joke so I was the only one that had the MP? Even WD's bought a couple of MP's 2-3 days later into the war and some went SDI.
You never show any evidence to support your fairy tales and yet you constantly say I'm 100% wrong. You're a joke!
The truth is, we bought at least 5 MP's for WD's, our next wonder purchases were mass SDI's as we knew OP would come for us and they did 3 days after on day 30. Are you trying to say that the alliance with the top 5 earners only had 1 MP between them on day 30? We had almost all of our bottom tier in NA at the hands of WD's and we only had 1 MP between the entire alliance? Really.
There is some logic for you, why don't you show me these facts you talk about so much?
The Dark Order DoW
in Tournament Edition Open World Forum
Posted
How did i miss that gold.
BS talker, haven't you noticed, many of these leaders are trying to keep this game fun and fair as possible. Its not easy when you have a very small group controlling a very large group that are doing the total opposite.