-
Posts
346 -
Joined
-
Last visited
Content Type
Profiles
Forums
Blogs
Gallery
Posts posted by OverlordShinnra
-
-
I believe TTK will use their best judgement on what PZI really means. Forcing players to delete is not healthy and is a worst offense in many regards then spying.
-
-
Congrats.
-
I love it.
-
Meh, any alliances are aloud to have any ties they want and it should be valid. But I do agree that people need some ambition. There are few alliances that drive politics. It would be great if there were more. I'm not claiming one bloc has a monopoly on moving politics or making the game interesting. But I am claiming that these politics moving alliances are few and far between and a lot has to do with the apathy and lack of ambition alliance leaders have.
-
The first wars were going for the full week since 5/6. Don't see the point.
-
To argue about e-politics, the meet and potentially make new friends you'd otherwise probably never meet, to build up stats so you can have fun watching them get blown up while you are blowing up other peoples stats...there is no purpose for the game, people still play it because it has a cult following. It's a place for guys and gals to potentially have fun or more likely be stressed out. If your goal in cn is to be in an alliance that is ranked number one then good for you but that doesn't mean you win. The number one spot changes, alliances come and go. There is no way to win this game because there is nothing to win, MHA was number one before, so was Sparta, so was NPO, etc etc. and now it is GPA.
See either all of those alliances were winning at the time they were number 1 OR there is no purpose to this game. I believe the former because being in a dominating position is as close as you will get to winning in this game.
-
Respectable imo
-
3 days?
What was 3 days?
-
You are wrong, no one wins cn. Also the neutral ns is useless ns anyways, it just inflates top 5% margin which again doesn't matter since everyone over 25k ns has mp's.
Then what is the purpose of this game?
-
I don't know whether to laugh, or take your consideration as serious. I'll go with the first.
Take it as serious was the correct answer.
-
If people think my definition of winning is off or doesn't mesh with yours. I invite you to give me another one.
-
I have heard this thought that alliances that don't do anything and aren't out for world domination should be left alone. I couldn't disagree with this philosophy more. It is a very simple argument to make --
Cybernations is a game
Games have winners
To win in Cybernations you want to be in a dominant position (Be in a High ranking)
Currently Neutrals and Neutral-Lite alliances have a pretty firm grip on the higher rankings whether it be alliance-wide (GPA, WTF) or Nation Wide (Hime Themis)
There is a pretty significant block of NS that has a political philosophy that doesn't mesh well with rolling the above alliances (SF/XX/Polarsphere)
Therefore the next predicted war is just a precursor to the above plan
-
confirmed and reciprocated.
-
This is certainly interesting.
-
I do know about the rest of you.... But I am enjoying my fights! Especially with your leader, cant beat some friendly fighting :)
I am actually really surprised at how well ODN have done.... Well done ladies :P keep up the good fight and o/ casualties
while we are talking about casualties, i would have more if i bought infra rather than military :P but hey... 150k casualties for a nation that can only have 7k at one time is pretty decent.You've had twice as much time to buy stuff as I have so I would expect you be there. :p
o/ Lady Shinnra
-
And you realize you have plenty of open offensive war slots that could be filled right?
If you really want to get in an epeen contest (Which we aren't interested in).
I have more casualties then the top 3 Misfits combined.
/discussion
-
At least they war for their AA.....
6 offensive wars ODN..
19 offensive wars misfits
Not impressed
You guys done yet?you must be a newb.
-
-
I don't think we need to argue about it any longer. It's not really on the top of my "to do list" to get rid of your treaty, I'm just letting you know that it's stupid.
As some fun though, I can see that you guys are indeed prepared.
Desired Religion: Norse
Desired Government: Capitalist
Threat Level: Severe
Tax Rate: 28%
Number of Spies: 20
Last Nuke Purchase: None
Last Wonder Purchase: 5/7/2013
Total Money: $29
Technology: 184.67 Levels
Last Bill Payment: 5/6/2013 12:27:14 AM
Trade Partners: None
Total Aircraft: 44
Aircraft Fighter Strength: 72
Aircraft Bomber Strength: 80
Navy Purchases Today: 0
Navy Vessels:- Corvettes: 6
- Landing Ships: 0
- Battleships: 4
- Cruisers: 3
- Frigates: 0
- Destroyers: 2
- Submarines: 0
- Aircraft Carriers: 0
-
The "And you will" portion didn't refer to myself really (though it could have been). It referred to the fact that a lot of alliances in TE are determined to keep this game as TE and not SE. For that reason these alliances prefer fair fights, no treaties, war fought often and attacking whoever is number 1 (in nation rankings, not so much alliance rankings). So it was a threat in a sense but not from me directly so much as this notion is going to nip you in the butt sooner or later.
-
We respect your decision but we do not acknowledge your summary of our summary of your war to be accurate.
We think treaties are dumb
We think down-declares make the game less fun
No where in there do we say activating a treaty is dumb. Just dumb to have it in the first place. (Clarification)
-
-
It's mostly RIOT who deserves to be bashed here. They are the ones who asked for the down declare. NLoN probably can't find their way in a war let alone their way to the OWF but I'll butt out anyway seeing as my job here is done. Anyone who is anyone is aware of this.
A TTK Announcement
in Alliance Announcements (IC)
Posted
Also would be nice if you attacked whoever the spying alliance is :)