OverlordShinnra
-
Posts
346 -
Joined
-
Last visited
Content Type
Profiles
Forums
Blogs
Gallery
Posts posted by OverlordShinnra
-
-
this is... interesting.
-
Congrats to our comrades in INT
-
Know this. You stand no chance of victory.
-
I'm in the camp where prizes should be awarded for casualties or some other war related stat in addition to the top builders. That way you wouldn't get penalized for warring.
-
congrats guys. Go get it.
-
Congrats guys. I look forward to the coming months.
-
My dealings with IRON have been nothing but pleasant. The diplomats they send to us are top notch and I wish them nothing but the best going forward.
NPO, it is hard to get told you aren't good enough anymore, I know it. I want you to know I am here for you both to comfort you and take IRON's sloppy seconds :wub: . :wub:
-
people quite before three months already. Stick with three months imo.
-
Great War III. Cuz I said so.
-
Good call. The joint one with TPC, Warriors, Warriors x2 and now OP.
-
Yeah, TPC is leading the charge with 4 wars. There are a whole bunch with 3 now. Then there is RE and some smaller alliances with 2.
-
Great war. Don't know who to cheer for.
-
If there aren't any signatories, what the fuck are you doing?
Gentlemen's agreement imo
-
I'm told this isn't a DoN or promoting non-aggression in general. Therefore, my stamp of approval is uhmm... stamped.
-
ewwww promoting non-aggression. -10 points from Kashmir.
-
My understanding of the situation is that you guys were being called enablers because of your NS, not because of your free will or decision making.
But I digress, I've given my 2 cents on the topic.
The question when it comes to enabling is whether we used our NS in a certain way, not that we had NS to begin with. I wouldn't go around calling blocs who had NS enablers for no reason at all :psyduck:
-
What? I hope that sounded better in your head.
It sounds just fine on paper too. If we enabled someone to do some thinking we were taking action to do something and therefore were not being used OR we were actively sitting on our hands and letting ourselves be used willy nilly and taking no action in which case we were being used. It seems we are being accused of one or the other depending on what is convenient to the argument.
-
Oh hey look, another underhanded SF/XX comment. How original.
More irony from the talking heads in CnG, criticizing anyone for needing a leash despite the fact that your entire bloc has been a pet to a larger sphere since the breakup of SuperGrievances.
You guys need to get your stories straight. Were we enabling DH crimes (using DH) or were we being used (DH using us for their crimes). It seems the story gets switched so people can feel good about themselves.
-
And TPC wins the flag :facepalm:
Good luck guys!
I almost 100% positive RE is in the lead right now as far as flag runners. They have had two relatively easy wars and haven't been at war for ages. Then probably War Doves. Then TPC in third although in TPC's defense I think they have had 3 wars (I think one of which was tough).
-
My guess is they would have posted this at update if they had intended to initiate a DoW, but that is just a guestimate anyway. Also, how do you know the offending alliance isn't your alliance? :blink:
Any war is good war, especially against me.
-
TPC: 114k NS
Citadel: 178k NS
Total: 292k NS
OP: 137k
NDO: 149k
Misfits: 61k
Total: 347k NS
Down declare? I fail to see it. OP was just mad that we focused on them. Down with the evil infrastructure!
I remember the nukes and avg. ns being somewhere crazy in the TPC + Citadel advantage.
-
Planning against that is just trying to postpone the inevitable. You can't prevent power spheres from having conflicts with each other. It's probably one of the most basic, guiding principles of politics.
The word on the street is that if you have a conflict with the XX/SF power sphere they will just sit on their hands unless they have someone with a leash to guide them. :awesome:
-
Haven't you heard. We are enablers.
#AggressivePolitics
-
Not the best but not the worst either. I'm not going to bash someone for down declaring on someone who down declared them.
Enemy of AO
in Alliance Announcements (IC)
Posted
did this really require an announcement?